fluffyweresheep

83 Decks, 369 Comments, 50 Reputation

Yup, especially since krond was in development probably before this deck.

0
Posted 14 June 2012 at 02:02 in reply to #264329 on 4 Archons of the Apocalypse

Permalink

and less than half the price!

0
Posted 12 June 2012 at 05:06 in reply to #263690 on Delver beats: Angels to the rescue

Permalink

You should buy 5 karonas, and build a second deck for EDH. That deck could involve one homeward path, but also one of each vow(the one that makes it so enchanted creature can't attack you) and other little tricks like blazing archon to help out.

0
Posted 12 June 2012 at 01:49 as a comment on Karona?

Permalink

razing snidd and scornful egotist aren't that bad. Razing snidd is junk, but at least it isn't the worst card ever. Egotist a a 2/2 for three. Not good, but not too bad, either. The thing that makes him good is the many ways you can abuse his mana cost.

Karona? That isn't even that bad a card!

0
Posted 12 June 2012 at 01:46 in reply to #263618 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

*first time I see a reanimator deck*

first turn jin. Pish pash, thats a bunch of trash. Wait a second....

JK JK, like O M G ur deck s so spectculr rlly, just gg everyone this deck is da bombz! Get pwned!

Grafidiggers cage, and no, I will not wait patiently till turn 10 for you to hard-cast Akroma.

I'm Just sayin' that you should really look for any artifact removal you can find. And trust me, the only artifact removal printed in black is the worst ever printed.

0
Posted 10 June 2012 at 18:32 as a comment on Reanimator Type 1.5

Permalink

well gosh. That is sooo terrible. Can't believe that hasn't already been suggested.

0
Posted 10 June 2012 at 04:04 in reply to #262840 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

I love decks that obnoxiously make a list of their combos to show off poorly made deck lists.

I jest, I jest. Although, I will throw in my two cents.Curse of stalked prey is pretty good in a red black burn/vamp or blue red delver/stalker/proliferate decks. I don't know about Boros. I suppose it's fine.

Well, elite vanguard is a definite 4-of in such a fast deck. So is hellrider, as you could possibly tell from this page right here:

http://www.gatheringmagic.com/chrismascioli-041212-an-introduction-to-innistrad-block-constructed/
Take a look, you'll learn a lot.

Consider Rally the peasants. This card will win you games fast if you have just one or two in your deck. They flash back, and they are A LOT faster than your reforges, which I would advise you to take out. Goldnight commander is actually slower than you think. Selfless cathar is pretty bad. Not THIS bad
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=298075
...But pretty bad. So, I would suggest taking him out.

Also, restoration angel is a really good card. Like, really REALLY good.

Check out my deck please:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=343092

0
Posted 10 June 2012 at 03:58 as a comment on Human Boros (standard)

Permalink

Well, I'm not quit a fan of infect, partly due to it being cheap. I had a deck made up of some of the crappier infect cards out there during a three way, and ended up winning, without help of course. Infect is incredibly cheap, so I'm not sure whether to hate it or love it.

Nice deck though!
I only have ever seen one of these in tournament play, but it might get bigger!

Here's my standard build.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=343092

0
Posted 09 June 2012 at 21:58 as a comment on Standard is over!

Permalink

Yup. As much as I dislike the pup, there is no way it's really that bad. And the jar, it's too awesome to put on the list.(and it acts as a re-usable tutor, so it has that going for it.)

As for filthy cur, at least it's a 2-drop in black that is the least bit usable. Although I do think of it as a pretty bad card, I don't consider it REALLY terrible.

0
Posted 09 June 2012 at 21:44 in reply to #262784 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

You'd be surprised.

0
Posted 07 June 2012 at 01:22 in reply to #262211 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

PROPAGANDA!

LIES!

CONTROL FTW!

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 04:10 in reply to #261947 on Tibalt's Island of Misfit Toys

Permalink

But if I do get birds or rites, then I will be in GODLY shape!


Yeah, might change that.

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 04:06 as a comment on Beware the mist! ~~~~~~~ (my take on turbo fog)

Permalink

One with nothing is actually an interesting card.

For one thing, it works pretty damn well with hellbent, (easily wins games) in some cases it works well with self milling, dredge combo goes into effect, madness cards become even better, and of course reanimator. Also, paying BBU to make target player discard their hand isn't too bad.

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 03:44 in reply to #261752 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

Believe me, I love the vizzerdrix, it's just a hilariously bad card. seven for a 6/6 aint bad, but its rare, and... Well.... Not much else to say about that.

Island fish is bad cause it has so many bad drawbacks. I love seven mana for a 6/8! Oh look, it's completely useless, and when it isn't, its hard to use!

0
Posted 05 June 2012 at 05:15 in reply to #261735 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

niiiccceee deck broooo,

Yes, I agree that you should cut the llanorwar elves. The best move here would be to replace them with boneyard wurms.

I personally think you should main deck one or two gnaw to the bones, since they can win games easily. Also, whatever happened to dream twist? It is friggin game winning! GAME WINNING!

and please check out my horrid monstrosity right here:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=345635

0
Posted 05 June 2012 at 01:47 as a comment on Splintertree

Permalink

Now were debating the worst mythics?

Anyways, why I was saying was that if they reprinted negator in a set inside the standard format, it would be printed as a rare. I never said I thought of cast through time as the worst mythic, but I do think mythic is a bit much for a card that will be useless in most decks. I do think that cast through time is a fun card, and would probably be fun for commander.

Zephyr spirit may have a little bit of card advantage, but it's still pretty bad. Mainly its mana cost is what really sucks about it. I can pay six mana each turn to keep one of my opponents creatures at bay! Surely I will win!

No.

Mudhole is a stupid card, and tormods crypt is a artifact that can be activated as an instant. You can't surprise them at the end of your turn with it, but tormods crypt can easily intimidate your opponent, and then you can take advantage of that.

0
Posted 05 June 2012 at 01:38 in reply to #261198 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

Bad legendaries? NONSENSE!

0
Posted 04 June 2012 at 15:33 in reply to #260991 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

You have got to be joking. Why are you defending this card? It sucks!

heres an article that features it.

http://jmgariepy.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/the-top-ten-most-reviled-magic-the-gathering-cards-according-to-gatherer-part-2/

0
Posted 04 June 2012 at 04:27 in reply to #261287 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

razorfield thresher is a 6/4 for seven. The reason I didn't put it on the list is because it is an artifact. Artifacts are meant to be expensive, since all decks can use them

However bog hoodlums is black, and is either a 4/1 can't block for six, or a 5/2 can't block for six. Either way, it can be easily taken care of, and can't even block your opponents. Yes, you can get it out with a lackey, but since it's a goblin deck, bog hoodlums will most likely come out as a 4/1, which is absolutely terrible, even if you can attack with it turn three. Yes, you can use it's clash ability to get rid of the top bad card of your library. But for six mana, scrying one and getting either a 4/1 or a 5/2 (both can't block) is just the worst.

0
Posted 03 June 2012 at 19:00 in reply to #261287 on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

^ what he said, except consider more red dragons like the one with bloodthirst 7 and such...

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=345635

0
Posted 03 June 2012 at 07:36 in reply to #261278 on dragon Deck *HELP

Permalink

201-220 of 369 items