GeneralM

Wait isn't this whole deck about having a large hand to power up your creature? Don't think of it as a way to steal creatures. I mean ya if they're that stupid then fine. Think of it as a way to draw two cards and make your opponent lose two cards. In addition to the benefit of having a larger hand( Psychosis Crawler, Overbeing of Myth) you also make your opponent lose theirs. That doesn't mean that you can play this card and just expect to win, but it would help provided you have a plan. Especially against combo decks considering they need every card they can get to set of their combos. And even if they discard at the end of their turn that means less cards to play on yours. ;-)

Alright, fine by me. I'll start with the obvious, Young Pyromancer.

I like the deck. I don't know what to say about the description.

:-).

Wouldn't even be surprised.

Your Avatar reference has swayed me.

Would you perhaps like burn// turn over wear// tear?

Wolfdragon7? Is he your evil twin?)

We're all idiotic on the inside, some just hide it better than others XD

Butcher Ghoul for sure.

Works for me :)

Whoa calm down. Even if you don't like it, I don't see why you're acting so hostile towards someone who simply mentioned the name. And if I'm not mistaken, aren't you the one who downvoted everyone's comments just because they posted on that deck? What is your beef? You may or may not know this but when the deck first came out there was Land in it. Granted there wasn't very much but there was. Even if you don't think it was a good idea, all you have to do is say so. Or better yet, you clearly have been playing this game for quite sometime, why don't you tell him how to make it better. Yes I understand that posting Decks with no actual consideration for the game is bad. That deck simply didn't work out. If all we did was post perfect decks with obvious strategies this site would die just as quickly. Don't believe me? Check out the now ghost town that is the new page. That's why he posted the deck. He wanted a deck that didn't just pass as another deck that nobody cares about. The idea that started the deck was not entirely horrible. And don't tell me that I'm wrong because than what would that be saying about this deck. This deck that you liked. And excuse me for not realizing that his strategy revloved around that one card! Perhaps we're all not just complete and total machines like you that never make mistakes and are always right!

This deck link doesn't work. (1:^l)

Angels are hard to pull off in standard these days. I think you should focus a little bit more on the human side of this. Which brings me to suggest Fiendslayer Paladin.

You lost 4 mana but got a card gap of 4, Don't forget that you draw two cards as well. So you could easily benefit from the discard but your entire deck can benefit from the draw aspect. Your opponent really can't win, especially since you'll end up with the stronger creatures. It is a difficult card to play though. You really have to know what your opponent is thinking. Of course that still doesn't change the fact you don't have any swamps XD

Pacifism is great on a sideboard! In fact it's great on a mainboard but either way. Ethereal Armour is also useful especially if your creature is unblockable.

Talrand's Invocation perhaps.

I would try it :-)

Can't access this link for some reason.

I suppose I understand the concept. I feel like he should possibly put the Quicken count down to two. I mean, even if you play Supreme Verdict on your own turn it generally means you're winning right? The question is, how do you follow up.