GyKx

81 Decks, 537 Comments, 193 Reputation

True but when it hits turns two and three , 9/10 times i need that mana, so while it wouldnt hinder the deck in that regard, its equally viable without it

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 18:43 in reply to #382241 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

They can also be either or, they don't have to be both, they're better when they are, but if they're only one or the other they are just as viable and free to be played, and shouldn't down because they're not. Constructive and respectful criticism is welcome and appreciated even if it's not used. Being mean and rude, isn't necessary for any reasoning.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 18:38 in reply to #382568 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

Cause the deck wasn't jank, that was your opinion of it which you are entitled to. And if i'm gonna use Goblin Test Pilot, im gonna design an entire deck to use him to the full extent of his "powers"

-1
Posted 25 July 2013 at 18:34 in reply to #382568 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

now that is a better suggestion for invigorate and ill consider it, Pendelhaven while great would actually slow the deck in terms of not letting me use the mana and would break the budget ceiling of this deck

1
Posted 25 July 2013 at 18:30 in reply to #382241 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

I don't mind when people try to help me. I mind when people are so determined to get me to change a deck to the way they want to see it or would play it when it doesn't necessarily need it. There are options in magic for better and worse cards, better and worse decks, and people have to the right to choose which one they want to go with. If a person says they don't want to change something in a deck of theirs leave it alone or go an rebuild the deck yourself and prove yourself right and get your satisfaction from that instead of beating down on someone else just because you think you're right. I've made some decks that are absolutely terrible and have won sometimes and have lost most of the time. And when they win it is in a RIDICULOUS fashion which is the point of it. So let me close with this, once you give someone your advice, it is their decision what to do with it, and whatever they decide just respect it because no matter what you say or do, it's their decision to make. Respect that decision, and leave it be because commenting about it over and over again, is just gonna make that "horrible deck" stay on the active/hot page for longer

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 18:26 in reply to #382568 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

Monster Reborn?? Jk, he could have a gate with white mana in his land base as a back up

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:53 in reply to #376768 on Defended to Death

Permalink

I'm not saying that, i admit it when a deck can be way better than it currently is, however i also like playing deck that has a theme/gimmick to it and is viable in that form as well as decks that are super strong and competitive.

The fact that the hot page is broken, well thats just the way it is for now until they change it, and if the hot page is your major problem, stop looking at it, use the other tabs and search function for decks you want.

I appreciate you thinking about and trying my advice, if it had worked wonderful if not then it didn't. Had you said no thanks i don;t want to try it, i'd have left it at that. It's an individuals choice to make a deck better or not, if they don't want, then leave it alone. If they get beat 5000 times in a row because, they'll either start to listen to advice or they'll quit because they're not perfect at it or to stubborn to admit they're wrong.

My infect deck that's on the hot page is a second version, and first i was pretty closed off to suggestions but upon looking at them deeper it really worked many times better and is now one of my favorite decks. But at the same time i respect others decisions and indecisions on their decks.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:51 in reply to #382568 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

axebane generates the white mana

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:39 in reply to #376768 on Defended to Death

Permalink

First let me post my argument of Primal Rage over Invigorate.
Invigorate let's me kill a creature.
Primal Rage let's me kill that creature and the player.

Might of Old krosa could be very good, if i go with it i'd probably replace Vines of Vastwood or Ranger's Guile

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:37 in reply to #382241 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

The red lands are in there because ive come across a few several games where my axebanes got killed off, but i could still fireball with my land for the win.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:24 in reply to #382571 on Death by Defender: Budget

Permalink

Not really, i've already stated a few times im happy with the way deck is and don;t want to make any additional changes to it yet they continue to repost it as if it will force me to do so. As for the entire "deck" devoted to it, disrespect and rudeness is just completely uncalled for in any and all regards, life, games, etc everything. And it's really annoying that people who create decks with a fun idea are consistently badgered, harassed, and nearly humiliated by individuals who have to have their way and try to force their idea onto another individual when t is not there place to do so. If a person says they don;t want to make any other changes they should leave it at that.

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:21 in reply to #382241 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

My counter argument to that is many players may not realize that deck is that bad. They may be new players, returning players, or non competitive players. Any of these can make it so a player is unaware of all of the things that can counter a deck in its entirety or its core function. In those cases its not their fault for being naive to whats in the game. Again we can not expect every individual to be in the competitive format and f t reaches that stage we should all stop playing, so yes some decks are going to be bad. but instead of consistently badgering them on it, post it once, if they take it great,
if not oh well and let it go

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:15 in reply to #382568 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

there are only 3 to trigger with axebane in standard, another that now exists but would not work in this deck, is to have a total of at least 4 mutavaults and or awaken the ancients on your field, then exile ready // willing onto elite arcanist when you cast him, infinite mana and indestructible creatures

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 17:07 in reply to #382559 on Death by Defender: Budget

Permalink

alchemist is one of the triggers for infinite mana combo

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:58 in reply to #382559 on Death by Defender: Budget

Permalink

No i agree the hot page is broken, and i plan on deleting this deck in a while, i just want to get it out there so people realize that there is no need to be rude.

And if people don;t want to admit there is a problem with their deck or that it could be better, it's their prerogative and it's not anyone elses place to try to change that. I agree there are issues with individuals and their decks but posting about them disrespectively doesn't resolve the issue, as a matter a fact continuing to post on a bad deck just keeps those decks on the hot page longer. I mean my own maze's end deck on there sucks pretty badly, it was done better than most but still sucked and people ramping on about how i should change it even if i said no is how it is STILL up there.

And while your post was somewhat rudely made it was at least done intelligently which a majority of the comments that this is directed towards are not.

4
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:57 in reply to #382545 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

im just gonna leave this here
http://www.mtgvault.com/gykx/decks/how-to-comment-on-a-deck/

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:17 in reply to #382241 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

Probably not competitive standard, it could definitely hold its own but many standard decks run faster than this an could cause a lot of issues, so while it could do well in standard its a more casual feel than most standard decks

0
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:15 in reply to #382523 on Angel of Life Vampire of Death

Permalink

Seeing how its in my sideboard i wont have any trouble casting it.

5
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:13 in reply to #382516 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

Its not a problem, just across the 20 something decks of mine that have made the hot list for an extended period of time i've gotten tired of the very rude comments people make, so i wanted to post this to try to get to people realize that the people on here are, well people, and should be treated as such. And the deck looks better now

4
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:12 in reply to #382504 on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

I appreciate the humor of saying the deck needs cards, however the point is to get this read, not to play it. And the the only card is sideboarded, so i dont need land yet.

3
Posted 25 July 2013 at 16:10 as a comment on How to Comment on a Deck

Permalink

81-100 of 491 items