GyKx

81 Decks, 537 Comments, 193 Reputation

The deck already makes very reliable turn 3 wins I'm not sure I want to make any changes

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 20:41 in reply to #381398 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

Utvara hellkite man, powerful dragon

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 20:39 as a comment on **Dragon's Breath**

Permalink

Won't be standard

1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 20:36 in reply to #381366 on You want to play? That's cute

Permalink

Imma go with no

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 20:35 in reply to #381350 on Planeswalker Defense Force

Permalink

Because I don't always get it so its a great secondary win condition, and you can't block the additional trample damage

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 20:30 in reply to #381398 on Unblockable Infect +X/+X v2

Permalink

Take out the chandras and its budget lol

1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 13:19 as a comment on Izzet Punk (Standard)

Permalink

The reason i went with white is a lot of decks run in main sideboard illness in the ranks, meaning my 1/1 elemental tokens will be instantly dead, i wont have them to do anything with, while guttersnipe is a great card, i wanted to more focus on the barrage side of it than the burn side. Believe me, if i had wanted to make a burn with pyromancer, i would have

1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 12:23 in reply to #381138 on Sparky Sparky Boom Man!!

Permalink

i think ill switch the two in the sideboard for it cause im not too sure, this isnt really a burn style deck per say. though i would like a like for the deck

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 02:24 in reply to #381055 on Sparky Sparky Boom Man!!

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/gykx/decks/sparky-sparky-boom-man/

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 02:06 as a comment on Group: Wizards at War

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/gykx/decks/sparky-sparky-boom-man/

1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 02:05 as a comment on GeneralM_ Read the description

Permalink

I have a lot of draw already, maybe ill side board some though anyways

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 01:39 in reply to #381040 on Sparky Sparky Boom Man!!

Permalink

aquitects will doesn't lock down at all, just gives them blue mana as an option

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 01:03 as a comment on Budget: Pro Liferation

Permalink

kinda yeah lol

0
Posted 22 July 2013 at 00:39 in reply to #381013 on ProliferJace

Permalink

it still leaves you with 10 one drops and its not your creatures that would be, it'd be theirs if they block nighthawk or any other buffed up creature, plus doom blade kills

-1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 00:36 in reply to #380960 on Just some Black

Permalink

thats why i said just 1, if not that than one mark of the vampire, lowers the mana curve and you already have one lifelink creature

-1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 00:33 in reply to #380960 on Just some Black

Permalink

i wouldn't recommend those two, it would up your mana curve too much making the deck harder to play, if your going to put in blood artist id say remove 2 diregraf and 1 dark favor

-1
Posted 22 July 2013 at 00:12 in reply to #380960 on Just some Black

Permalink

Now this is actually a good deck, maybe blood artist to combo off of all the death

-1
Posted 21 July 2013 at 23:57 in reply to #380960 on Just some Black

Permalink

No, decks that follow the rules are awesome, decks that ignore them just to be what the creator thinks is funny are an abomination to the multiverse and should be permanently exiled

-1
Posted 21 July 2013 at 23:22 in reply to #380960 on Just some Black

Permalink

Please delete this piece of s*** now, these are the kinds of decks that made me create 20 decks in the span of a week to get them off the hot list

0
Posted 21 July 2013 at 23:18 as a comment on Just some Black

Permalink

The point is to have several of a non token creature to use infinite reflection on to have an army of nighthawks

0
Posted 21 July 2013 at 02:17 in reply to #380677 on Shadowborn...Nighthawk? O.o?

Permalink

121-140 of 491 items