A very similar thing happened to me.... Except that I had little-to-no lands, and when I did have one or two I had no mana makers
Permalink
Great looking deck, but there seems to be a consistent problem with getting out lands Probably because there are only 19. I run 20 in modern Infect
For modern, you'll need to get rod of Phyrexian Dreadnought and the non-swamp lands
Nah, I think that Blistercoil is a much better card, in ways. But, I will add 2 into the SB. They could be useful there!
For a deck based around death, I see a surprisingly little amount of it.... Yeah, I do see a fair bit, but I've designed decks with a lot more of it. If it is death, the cards you play should make sure everything dies, or lose life e.g. Soulcage Fiend + Demonlord of Ashmouth combo, with Blood Artist, it is pretty good
Doesn't mean that I don't know aggro My standard Rakdos deck wins in 5-10 turns
http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/my-tournament-infect/ Trust me on this one
-1 forest, -4 Ranger's Guile (more of an SB card) +4 Ichorclaw Myr/Necropede
Obviously.
Needs more life gain for Ajani's Pridemate
Wrong again. I'm saying how you don't know about win-cons is linked to the fact E.g. You play Rakdos, even without haste you generally win the next turn. If of course you have a good deck. By definition, that is a win-con. AND they are one of the most important parts of MTG I guess you don't play control
So do I, what's your point? Just because I like modern more doesn't mean I don't know standard
I don't have the funds either, yet I post a series of well constructed decks Even though I don't have a hope of building them!
No, it has to do with your overall knowledge of deck building
Wrong turn. Whoops, I don't use Mogis. I also know aggro decks AND have my own win-cons in them http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/cult-of-rakdos/ Exava, and Desecration Demon. I don't NEED them, but they do win me games. Win-cons are for any deck really With your "gods are creatures" comment, yeah they are... IF your devotion is high enough. 15 creatures+gods aren't enough! Then again, for someone who thinks that modern and below are broken wouldn't reall know about win-cons now, would they? (Yes I remember)
I see Rakdos as a win-con. A not-so good one, but one none the less. With this deck, I see a lot of their creatures not being around long. Mogis's ability would trigger Rakdos's Win-con achieved Also, you need more creatures. 15 isn't enough in Rakdos, I run about 19/20 and people say I could use a few more
You can post with those cards mentioned in the description, hell, I do it for almost all of my decks. For me it is the concept that counts. If you decide to build it, then worry about the cards you have Also, good deck. Not quite as evil as Lawful, but good If you really want it neutral evil, I'd stack it with mono-black kill spells/life loss
Considering your mana curve, I'd drop 2 for something like Hero's Downfall
My Rakdos deck is amazing, so I took all my inspiration from that! Why mess with a good thing?
Hello, Sway! Haven't heard from you in a while. Just announcing my own Hyper Budget deck; Hyper Budget: Rakdos! http://www.mtgvault.com/s0rinmark0v/decks/hyper-budget-rakdos-2/
1,161-1,180 of 2,278 items