thewuest

0 Decks, 364 Comments, 44 Reputation

That would be Ranger's Guile.
Ranger's Guile G
Instant
Target creature you control gets +1/+1 and gains hexproof until end of turn

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 19:25 in reply to #220577 on Tin Soldiers

Permalink

That's funny. I just made a Golem-centered standard deck. Could you look at it?
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=269833

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 19:23 as a comment on Tin Soldiers

Permalink

Hi all. Could you look at this interesting inexpensive idea for standard? It abuses Precursor Golems. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=269833

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 17:47 as a comment on The New Bloodline Version 1.0

Permalink

Hi all. Could you look at this interesting inexpensive idea for standard? It abuses Precursor Golems. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=269833

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 17:41 as a comment on I have Wet Dreams About Thrun!

Permalink

Hi all. Could you look at this interesting inexpensive idea for standard? It abuses Precursor Golems. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=269833

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 17:38 as a comment on ADVERTISE 2!!!

Permalink

Hi all. Could you look at this interesting inexpensive idea for standard? It abuses Precursor Golems. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=269833

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 17:36 as a comment on think twice or ill shoot you

Permalink

Well, if your tolstoy sword is mainly meant for protecting yourself against red decks, why not sideboard it?

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 16:32 in reply to #220066 on Invisiblade

Permalink

Random silly combo deck no 1: Lich + Transcendence = ???
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=266054

Random silly combo deck no. 2: Ad Nauseam + 0 CMCers = ???
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=242023

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 02:43 as a comment on ADVERTISE 2!!!

Permalink

Oh, sorry about the Delver. Completely missed that. Didn't realize that 2 of the lands were Ghost Quarters, sorry about that, too. If you want to spend the money, more Feast and Famine might be better than 2 of each sword. The untapping of lands could leave the hand open for casting instants. But then again, 4x Silver-Inlaid wouldn't be bad either, as it is cheap in CMC and adds more power.

0
Posted 08 December 2011 at 22:47 in reply to #220066 on Invisiblade

Permalink

I made a slightly similar deck for standard play. Could you please check it out? Thanks. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=268655

0
Posted 08 December 2011 at 04:04 as a comment on Image of the Invisible

Permalink

Dagger only works on Stalker, as the Delver is an insect when it attacks well. You might want late game options, less land, etc.
At least Trinket mage can be your Stoneforge.
I made a slightly similar deck for standard play. Could you please check it out? Thanks. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=268655

0
Posted 08 December 2011 at 03:58 as a comment on Invisiblade

Permalink

Hi. Mana Leak needs to be mainboard. Simple, powerful strategy otherwise. Mind Control isn't as useful for this deck.
I made a slightly similar deck for standard play. Could you please check it out? Thanks. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=268655

0
Posted 08 December 2011 at 03:55 as a comment on hexproof unblockable

Permalink

...and here's what I tried. Respect given to you. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=268655

0
Posted 07 December 2011 at 04:12 in reply to #219780 on think twice or ill shoot you

Permalink

You have less than a 1/3 probability of a spell being on the top of your deck, so delver isn't fully taken advantage of. It isn't a waste, and still is kind of worth it, but not the BEST spell in all situations.
I think you need more equipment for your early evasive beaters. Perhaps, if you're on a budget, Darksteel Axe or Runechanter's Pike?
It feels like you're halfway in between small evasive aggro and mana ramp. You might want to chose the direction in which you will eventually go.
Still, cool deck. +1

0
Posted 07 December 2011 at 03:48 as a comment on think twice or ill shoot you

Permalink

You have way to many swords. If you have as many swords as creatures, you will have extra, especially since they're expensive to cast. They're just a waste of deckspace and money at this point.

0
Posted 23 November 2011 at 02:01 as a comment on unblockable t2

Permalink

I like the concept. However, this is one situation where Drifting Meadows, etc are better than the colored cycling lands, because it's free with fluctuator.
+1

0
Posted 22 November 2011 at 18:43 as a comment on Turn 2 win! Fluctuator/Mortal Kombat

Permalink

nvm, deleted that deck. Remaking soon.

0
Posted 15 November 2011 at 00:46 in reply to #214323 on MonoBlack Heartless Summoning

Permalink

Thanks. My game plan is actually for those creatures to die. With Suture Priest and Skar... High Priest (the guy who makes demons, forgot his name, along with sun titan, I get beaters and life. So it's strange, but...
I don't think it will be that great without a serious investment of thought.
About your deck... Looks very solid. Not many suggestions.

0
Posted 15 November 2011 at 00:39 in reply to #214323 on MonoBlack Heartless Summoning

Permalink

Solid deck.
I made a heartless deck that is kind of morally reprehensible. Could you check it out? http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=260169

0
Posted 14 November 2011 at 05:03 as a comment on MonoBlack Heartless Summoning

Permalink

Good deck. Bigger self-mill presence than usual, which is interesting. I think you should decide between Sheoldred and Sun Titan and double up on one, take the other out. Same function. It's pretty much impossible to get out Obliterator without unburial rites, so that should go, too.
But hey, I could be completely wrong. I like how it looks already. +1

0
Posted 14 November 2011 at 02:51 as a comment on std extraction take 2

Permalink

161-180 of 348 items