agnorak262

36 Decks, 287 Comments, 9 Reputation

Some possibilities are in sideboard.

0
Posted 19 December 2011 at 07:32 in reply to #222815 on Radiant Archangel EDH

Permalink

Please Give opinions on changes that should be made. Thanks. :)

0
Posted 19 December 2011 at 07:04 as a comment on Radiant Archangel EDH

Permalink

I agree with the addition of katari remnant. can Be fed to FoW and could cascade into hypergenesis or one of the other cascade cards and re-cascade. Requires more mana but I think it is worth it. Also consider finding a replacement for Grand Colleseum, consider Gemstone Mine or you could even add Gemstone Cavern and Leyline of Anticipation and make this deck go off turn 0. :)

0
Posted 29 November 2011 at 23:39 as a comment on Cascade of Hypergenesis

Permalink

I agree with the addition of gemstone mine, maybe even gemstone cavern too.

0
Posted 29 November 2011 at 23:34 in reply to #215431 on Cascade of Hypergenesis

Permalink

I just built an omnath edh deck too. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=260487
I agree with the comment above. I run 36 lands. And I would add gauntlet of power, extraplanar lense, and caged sun. Check mine out for some ideas.

0
Posted 15 November 2011 at 01:54 as a comment on Omnath, ramp edh

Permalink

hmm, not a horrible idea. I actually do that in another deck. Thanks very much. Added.

0
Posted 15 November 2011 at 01:47 in reply to #214515 on OmNomNom EDH (Omnath)

Permalink

Yes, it would happen on the Next endstep, which would be theirs if I skip mine, but I don't completely skip my endstep. Here is how it works. I go to my endstep, then as the sacrifice effect is on the stack I sundial removing it from the stack. I don't think it ever re-activates. It should only be put on the stack once.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 20:00 as a comment on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Well, I'm not so sure about that. The oracle text says. Sacrifice this creature at the beginning of THE end step. So I believe it is referring to the next end step. So it would be a delayed stack response only on your end step right?

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 05:50 in reply to #213530 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Yea, just added more lands. And you're right. this is better multiplayer. It's really fun and pretty cheap though. Took Pandemonium out. Idk if that was a good move because with mimic vat and a ball lightning I can do insane damage, but if they play aggro it will often end up killing my stuff because mine have low defence. I guess its better in sideboard.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:55 in reply to #213521 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Yea, it is okay multiplayer so i dropped war elemental. I like the unsuspectingness of fireblast but it really isn't that great here. Just a simple assault strobe is ussually much more deadly.

Adding 1 more land because the mana curve seems okay, but with mimic vat and sundial the mana curve is actually 4 for most effectiveness.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:50 in reply to #213513 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Elemental Mastery looks sweet. Very cool if I can get it on a ball lightning or something with a sundial. But then its a 3 card combo. opinions?

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:12 as a comment on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

I know that it is deffinately a threat, but the benefits outweigh the risk in my opinion.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:08 in reply to #213506 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Can't decide if I like war elementals. They are better multi player. replacements?

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:05 as a comment on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

plus I don't need sundial to keep them too.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 03:03 in reply to #213502 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

I do really like fireblast. Perhaps I'll replace the 2 Last chances with something since I already have 4 final fortune and they don't work unless I can kill them, or have a sundial. Idk if it will be fireblast though. And I'm going to add another mimic vat, they are insanely powerful in here. A war elemental or 2 would be great too.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:59 in reply to #213502 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

actually if you look up their oracle texts they all say "at the beginning of the end step" So it's all delayed stack. You just have to look up rulings on each creature. I promise they all work.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:48 in reply to #213500 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Check out my really awesome mono red. I need some rulings so please help. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=258482

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:19 as a comment on PERFECT Burn Mono Red

Permalink

And maybe some way to grab a sundial quickly?

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:12 in reply to #213488 on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

Please gimme some suggestions for cards that would fit well into this sundial deck. Considering some type of non-basic land such as teetering peaks, and a side-board would be nice.

0
Posted 10 November 2011 at 02:04 as a comment on [Ruling Help] Sundial Aggro Burn

Permalink

I'm thinking you replace the sword of feast and famine with a different sword, It gives green + black protection and mirran crusaders which you run 4 of already have pro green + black. So It doesn't really add to color advantage.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 21:51 in reply to #213122 on Shit your pants on turn 3

Permalink

41-60 of 255 items