MagicLango

126 Decks, 160 Comments, 13 Reputation

Any thoughts?

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 04:10 as a comment on Taste the Rainbow

Permalink

Another of my attempts to get a head start on new phyrexia- what do you think?

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 04:07 as a comment on Prolific Blue

Permalink

Made some updates after the full new phyrexia reveal- let me know what you think.

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 04:05 as a comment on Equipment Weenie

Permalink

While I like the idea of that, it's really a different deck- more of a quest weenie focus. This relies on artifact creatures being pumped, so putting in quests, edgewrights, and swords would greatly detract from the focus of the deck and weaken it overall.

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 03:54 as a comment on Artifact Aggro

Permalink

Check out my br and bur versions:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=147063
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=177009

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 03:53 as a comment on Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension

Permalink

This is true, and also not ever going to happen in standard, or even extended because nobody really uses batwing brune.

0
Posted 28 April 2011 at 02:33 as a comment on Deceiving Twin

Permalink

consider going extended with some pestermites so you have an infinite combo in here too if u want

0
Posted 23 April 2011 at 20:48 as a comment on Liquimetal Control

Permalink

Okay, first off, seachrome coast is better than sejiri refuge in almost all situations. I like the idea here, although I'm surprised you don't have any myr galvanizers- they fit perfectly. Here are my alterations:
-4 sejiri refuge
-1 plains
-2 aura finesse
-3 vault skyward
-3 veteran's reflexes
-1 venser
-2 basilisk collar
-2 heavy arbalest
-2 crab umbra
-1 tideforce elemental
+4 myr galvanizer
+4 stoneforge mystic
+4 mana leak
+3 jace, the mind sculptor
+4 seachrome coast
+3 tectonic edge
This would make this deck rather more expensive if it weren't theoretical, but you get a lot more disruption with jace and mana leaks and edges, stoneforge lets u cut back on your equipment because you get to pick which you take, and galvanizers are untap engines for your mana myr.

0
Posted 22 April 2011 at 17:32 as a comment on Challenge: Heavy Arbalest 2

Permalink

Hmmm- I totally missed voltaic key! Good catch. I would probably drop the thrones of geth for some more land though- my first gut reaction changes would be:
-2 throne
-2 ichor rats
-8 mountain
-3 vector asp
-3 galvanic blast
-2 lightning bolt
-3 prototype portal
+6 swamp
+4 inkmoth nexus
+4 doom blade
+2 disfigure
+2 duress
+4 inquisition of kozilek
RIght now the red makes you much less consistent and doesn't really give you any benefits that you can't find already with black's removal, and since you are infect anyway, the ability to hit your opponent with your burn is irrelevant, making black removal even more attractive. I also don't really like vector asp at all, and thrones I guess work with a prototype portal, but you will need both cards for that combo to work, otherwise the thrones aren't that good, and contagion clasp already covers your repeatable proliferate, and you don't have enough other cards that use counters for the proliferate to be all that useful, so I would switch to a disruption suite of duress and inquisition instead.
Anyway, some good ideas in here, I'm off to your other response to my challenge now.

0
Posted 22 April 2011 at 17:22 as a comment on Challenge: Heavy Arbalest

Permalink

2 Feast and famines are intentional, I don't know why they are separate- but one of them might become war and peace from the new set depending how good it is.
The new paladin is in fact a knight, but I don't see how making it tribal would be useful- knight exemplar would be the only reason and its not worth it.

Removal is probably a g odd call savaj, I don't have time now though.

As for quest- I had thought about it, but with stoneforges finding and putting into play cheap and paladins making equips 0, I took them out. I think the creature suite reflects that, seeing as I have all the bouncing guys that would come standard in a quest deck, but no memnites or ornithopters or argentum armors to really make quest worth it.

0
Posted 15 April 2011 at 00:34 as a comment on Equipment Weenie

Permalink

I enjoyed this column today- I don't think that forked bolt for lightning bolt was a good swap though

0
Posted 14 April 2011 at 03:37 as a comment on Sickest Combo Deck-Standard

Permalink

Let me know what you think of this, and whether it could be effective in the new standard in some form.

0
Posted 14 April 2011 at 03:26 as a comment on Equipment Weenie

Permalink

I also have a rules question: If i sac a necropede to a throne of geth, can I stack the triggers so that I put the necropede's -1/-1 counter on something before I proliferate it? I'm not sure seeing as how saccing the necropede is a cost to activate the throne, which might mean it goes onto the stack first and the proliferate happens first.

0
Posted 06 April 2011 at 00:27 as a comment on Glissa Spamnation

Permalink

So I put in a few more poison sources, and I also added stuff that has good synergy with getting sacrificed (core prowler and necropede), as well as corpse curs for a bit more recurrence. It occurs to me now that Glissa is the only green in the deck at this point, so I'm wondering what to do about that.

0
Posted 06 April 2011 at 00:22 as a comment on Glissa Spamnation

Permalink

Thanks for the feedback- i made this really fast last night so yeah it's pretty rough. All of what you says makes a good deal of sense in fact. I love virulent wound. I'm going to make a few edits, and if you could give any more feedback that would be great.

0
Posted 06 April 2011 at 00:13 as a comment on Glissa Spamnation

Permalink

Indeed- in essence you could think of it like being blocked by a 0/0

0
Posted 21 March 2011 at 23:13 in reply to #144686 on HELP WITH RULES!

Permalink

hmmm... bonesplitter, winter orb (might be 2 dunno off the top of my head), lifelink, vigilance (is that a card?), and the 2 white spellbombs

0
Posted 27 February 2011 at 22:25 as a comment on 1 CC Edh Deck Suggestions Needed!

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=146541

0
Posted 27 February 2011 at 22:22 in reply to #135516 on Pyromancers ascention

Permalink

Nice- check out mine- I do infinite combos :D

0
Posted 27 February 2011 at 22:20 as a comment on Pyromancers ascention

Permalink

All suggestions are welcome.

0
Posted 25 February 2011 at 20:19 as a comment on MBC Infect

Permalink

81-100 of 158 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last