Puffermad

13 Decks, 269 Comments, 2 Reputation

it's because it's standard. lemonzest = idiot, after reading several of your comments.

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 17:19 as a comment on Blue and White Control Deck

Permalink

yeah give him some advice then, thats not good enough.It's just as bad to leave a comment like that without justification.

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 17:17 as a comment on Naya Behemoths

Permalink

+ 1 decent deck, again i agree with the others lol barbarian, i like your attitude hehe

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 17:14 as a comment on erg

Permalink

no problem, i enjoy helping people with their decks. I will revisit your deck, to see what changes you've made at a later point :-)

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 16:59 as a comment on Soldier

Permalink

well done for changing your message though, at least it's factual lol and not idiotic.

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 16:57 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

Cakins you have brought this upon yourself so don't whine, as i say you should be careful what you say

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 16:55 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

sharingan086 - only created one deck - poor, so doesn't count

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 15:56 as a comment on Soldier

Permalink

whoops 24 plains
4 pike masters

i've done this based on what cards you have posted, as i don't know what cards are within your budget etc..

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 15:50 as a comment on Soldier

Permalink

right mate, you have some decent cards for this deck, but you also have some terrible ones.

Let me explain, soldiers are meant by default to be an aggressive style of deck. when creating a deck, a strong focus is required to see where you want this deck to go. therefore the following cards are a poor choice for this deck:

safe passage - prevents damage, this is the wrong card for this deck, instead you should run more spot removal, as it allows you to take battlefield control, and ultimately the game.

heres what i would do:


3x Cloudgoat Ranger
4x Soul Warden
3x Captain of the Watch
4x Veteran Swordsmith
4x Knight of Meadowgrain
veteran armorsmith x 4
rhox pike master



Enchantments

2x Oblivion Ring


Land

22x Plains

Spells

4x Harm's Way
4x Path to Exile



0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 15:46 as a comment on Soldier

Permalink

@sharingan086. don't be so obnoxious. It's not cool to wrie ignorant comments like you just did. You think saying this deck suck is goin to help him improve.

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 15:35 as a comment on Soldier

Permalink

i'm not bad at magic you fool, you have proved for a second time that your stupid. You have no idea who i am, and therefore you can't make an informed decision on my playing ability. I also notice that you use very simplistic language, denoting a lack of intelligence.

You and cakins should form a special organisation for moderate retards, with special entry requirements, you simply have to be an idiot.

0
Posted 18 January 2010 at 14:10 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

you're a moron too, read the top of the page, and you might not make a stupid comment like this again. You shouldn't ever call someone a faggot without justification . the fact that you attempted to insult me with that insult makes you appear to be an ignoramus. He did in fact say you were bad magic, you're just like cakins, you don't think before you open your mouth. Son't ever talk to anyone like that again without proper reasoning.

quote

(If you have a steady income, and make a jund deck, like the one I have posted, and use it in any sanctioned event, you are just bad at magic.)

0
Posted 16 January 2010 at 17:05 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

+1

0
Posted 14 January 2010 at 17:03 as a comment on speedy land desctruction

Permalink

good +1 although the following, i would change.


- 4 grull drazz specter, it's very poor in this deck, with all the drawing + 4 hypnotic specter

- 3 blood chief ascension + 4 lightning bolt

- 1 duress

0
Posted 14 January 2010 at 17:00 as a comment on Draw / Discard V2

Permalink

in fact, this deck is a joke, it sucks. I've tried to be subtle, not too dramatic but jund is an absolutely fantastic deck. The deck has been honed to perfection over a number of months, and there will always be decks built specifically to beat it, fact. Like this pathetic deck for example. just cuz it beats jund doesn't mean it's decent.

if jund left the format, this deck would die. cakins you are a fool

0
Posted 14 January 2010 at 16:54 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

how is cakins right:

1. people who build jund decks have no imagination - debatable, maybe because it's succesful

2. If you have a steady income, and make a jund deck, like the one I have posted, and use it in any sanctioned event, you are just bad at magic. There is no way around that.

firstly it does not automatically make you bad at magic if you play jund, this is ignorant and people will play it because it's a strong deck but has a weak mana base and is subject to nasty cards loke stag, celestial cards etcc.

3. I very much doubt about what you said about the fog deck is true, it wins 90 percent of time, do you expect anyone who is good at standard to believe that ?

0
Posted 13 January 2010 at 16:50 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

the naya saber deck is actually a poor deck btw

0
Posted 13 January 2010 at 16:34 as a comment on Naya Sabre

Permalink

plus your deck would defeat jund but do poorly aginst many other types of deck. And be careful how you compose your next comment, think.

0
Posted 12 January 2010 at 05:09 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

the way you write your comments cakins, is very dodgy. You seem to be very impulsive and at times a complete dick. You make very bold and sweeping statements and sound ignorant as a result. And hwo exactly do i have nothing to back up my comments. My coments are purely statistical.

0
Posted 12 January 2010 at 05:07 as a comment on ANTI-JUND

Permalink

why would you put this up, everyone knows the jund deck lol

0
Posted 10 January 2010 at 08:19 as a comment on Jund

Permalink

81-100 of 264 items