d3Necromaster

I feel like you need a bit more land here.

Commanders authority and disenchant shouldn't be in here. That will also cut it down to 60 cards.

SO whats the deal with the name of this deck? It strikes me as portentous.

I feel like since this is going to be modern anyway you should get some kilnfiends up in here.

I've gotten pretty good at doing those. It helps to have looked at a lot of decks. Also to think a lot about what types of holes your current decks leave in your defense/offense. Shamless self promotion for my : Evolving Populations deck. I would recommend you check it out as I'm looking for idea's on how to improve it.

Hmmm, well I feel like you need more than 5 wincons (the walkers, and narset). Also is there any reason why your not using fetches? Fetches and scry lands seem like they would play really nice together.

Alright that makes sense, however cloudshift and is still really good for this deck, stop a removal on a spilcer and get another golem for your trouble, and triumph of the hordes really isn't that great, as if you can't deal ten with it then you have basically wasted a turn. So it does work with the fact that your deck has no other infect in it.

this deck doesn't lower costs it actually just pumps out more mana with battle hym. Like lets say turn one i do nothing but play a land, turn 2 i play young pyromancer, next turn i play Molten Birth so i have 4 creatures, then the next turn i play krenkos command for 7 then i play battle hym and get 7 mana, cast past in flames cast all the spells again then add even more mana with recast of battle hym, and then i either play burn at the stake and burn my opponent with creatures, or i use the mana i have to banefire them. Or i can also attack and stuff.

no board wipe?

For a budget I would recomend runchanters pike, unless it's price has shot way up.

Is empty the pits good in this? because it seems really weak . . . I feel its more of an edh card.

Why copy enchantment?

Why only one channel? that seems like the perfect thing for this deck. Is it restricted?

I would say get rid of the infect or add more of it your focus is a bit to split between life and poison as it stands.

Looks pretty legit, why does it say its not standard?

Immaculate magistrate combos hardcore with Joraga Warcaller. I would recommend it.

Rootborn defense? for boardwipe stoppage and combat tricks? I feel it would work better than entreat the angels here.

not a bad combo. Still i feel like you need something to stop a well placed naturalize from ruining your day. or even a bit of removal really. Maybe add some vines of the vastwood or aesticism for a budget option or privledged position for a less budget option

Your deck doesn't make any sense. It has more than 4 copies of cards which you can't have more than 4 copies of. Also you have way to many bombs, and not enough early game.

I would recommend that you replace giant's growth Vines of the vastwood. Actually I would just reocmend more vines of the vastwood in general, as well as a cloudshift or 2. But more than that, more than 11 lands. 11 is not enough close to enough. Triumph of the hordes as your only source of infect is not that great as well.