Well clearly nobody is ever going to tell me why this deck is named what it is named, so I will it is assume it is named this because it burns up in the face of RDW, adding fuel to the fire. Because chemistry.
Permalink
no way, I will need proof. sarcasm aside I think op knows that, its just that OP doesn't want to use them for some reason he hasn't shared. Probably price if i had to guess.
no, he doesn't need it, it would be useful, but is not needed. As it stands assault strobe, unblockable spell of your choice, and 3rd spell means game, he doesn't need manamorphose anywhere near as much as he needs gitaxian probe, to check for removal.
still with all the ripple this deck can probably bounce back easily. Now surgical extraction on the other hand . . .
I think he looked at landfall and realized that the word fall starts with an f and then through a long and arduous process realized that fetchlands bring in lands because they also start with f. Or maybe he was just stating the obvious.
That is a true statement, but its also irrelevant, much like dies to doomblade, that doesn't matter because you usually have a decent chance they don't have any removal in hand when they need it, and if they always have removal then chances are they don't have many threats.
its called all in, he plays a creature, then if they don't remove it, he swings for 20 unblockable and wins. Literally that's how this deck rolls. Yes 1 creature can go down easy, but if they decide it's a non-threat, or that they want to play their nice thing or the most likely scenario don't have removal that is useable this early/don't have the colors for their removal, then they die. Relying on a single card isn't a weakness, there are literally dozens of combo decks that do precisely that, and usually when they do well enough the cards that are used for the combo are all banned because the combo is to powerful.
This is half a deck . . . how did you get so many likes.
only 1 is needed.
Am I the only one a little sad there are no monstrous creatures in the deck?
Your deck needs more about 60% more IV training. Also I found the lack of faith you have in the helix disturbing.
ignore him he is probably a bot. Promoting some random deck. Or you can go spam random comments on his deck. I find it funny to do that. Doesn't have to make sense or be good advice just blurt random nonsense.
Storm Cauldron? to screw other people who can't play 4 lands a turn? also to get you 7 lands in hand easily. I would alsso consider some landfall creatures, like ramapaing baloths, or baloth woodcrusher.
Who downvoted me for hating dead cards at the top of the thread? is there someone out there who likes dead cards?
Scion of the ur dragon is a bad call here, you don't have anything worth copying with it.
really? well not that surprising but . . . yeah i guess he doesn't really fit the budget deck feel.
riftsweeper might be worth looking into then.
This deck was made for the same reason the anti budget deck was made. for the lols. Human beings don't play with decks like this.
Honestly you could save a lot of money by simply cutting the check lands. In the end they aren't going to make a huge difference with this many cards.
What about jace's phantasm?
321-340 of 1,024 items