HotPoloPlayer

19 Decks, 290 Comments, 151 Reputation

One, he has Invisible Stalker to help with removal. Two, from what I've play tested, the unblockable creatures are always on offense. And three, you want him to sacrifice two power between Giant Growth and Phytoburst just INCASE his opponent is running burn spells? Isn't that what a sideboard is for?

0
Posted 20 August 2013 at 04:40 in reply to #390296 on Dude, I swear I saw something!

Permalink

*There is no reason*

0
Posted 20 August 2013 at 04:16 in reply to #390296 on Dude, I swear I saw something!

Permalink

This focuses on unblockable creatures. The entire purpose of the pumping spells is to stack up more damage. The is no reason for it to be an instant in this deck.

0
Posted 20 August 2013 at 03:16 in reply to #390296 on Dude, I swear I saw something!

Permalink

Why not add Phytoburst in place of Titanic Growth?

1
Posted 19 August 2013 at 21:17 as a comment on Dude, I swear I saw something!

Permalink

The Rush of Blood, Reverb and Fling combo is awesome, but is it necessary against one opponent? I could see it being very useful in multiplayer matches. And i mean VERY useful. The only real problem is that Rush of Blood acts like another Reverberate or Increasing Vengeance when you already have enough. From my point of view, it seems like you are missing another card with a Fling like effect.

0
Posted 18 August 2013 at 18:35 in reply to #390021 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

Correct.

0
Posted 18 August 2013 at 04:51 in reply to #389684 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

He is what i hate about parts of the Magic: the Gathering community. Especially on Mtgvault.

0
Posted 17 August 2013 at 22:34 in reply to #389525 on And not a creature in sight!

Permalink

To quote myself, "It seems to me that the majority of the instants and sorceries you have are all there for the same purpose, and that is to Fling and copy. Once you are doing that you should be going for a kill, aren't you? So wouldn't Guttersnipe just add more damage than is needed?" Im not saying Guttersnipe is bad, Im just not sure if it is necessary.

0
Posted 17 August 2013 at 18:24 in reply to #389812 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

Even better!

0
Posted 17 August 2013 at 04:12 in reply to #389430 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

There are a lack of early plays.

0
Posted 17 August 2013 at 04:12 in reply to #389658 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

The description is slightly misleading. He says that Flinging the Ancient is ideal, but not necessary. Dragon Hatchling, Dragon Egg and Furnace Whelp can swing for serious damage. Also, it would be great if we had a third party give input into whether or not Guttersnipe fits in the deck.

0
Posted 16 August 2013 at 21:28 in reply to #389658 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

How does Deathrite Shaman remove Emrakul, the Aeons Torn?

0
Posted 16 August 2013 at 21:14 in reply to #389525 on And not a creature in sight!

Permalink

So you are saying that a sliver deck must use NOTHING but slivers? Seriously?

2
Posted 16 August 2013 at 21:13 in reply to #389389 on ive found the right sliverdeck

Permalink

It seems to me that the majority of the instants and sorceries you have are all there for the same purpose, and that is to Fling and copy. Once you are doing that you should be going for a kill, aren't you? So wouldn't Guttersnipe just add more damage than is needed?

0
Posted 15 August 2013 at 21:15 in reply to #389435 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

I think we all do. Glad I could actually help.

0
Posted 15 August 2013 at 21:01 in reply to #389435 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

Ha ha! I hate when that happens.

0
Posted 15 August 2013 at 21:00 in reply to #388395 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Why is everyone calling it Skullcrank? It's Skullcrack.

1
Posted 15 August 2013 at 20:57 in reply to #388395 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

If you are fine with discarding then Wild Guess and Reforge the soul could be useful.

0
Posted 15 August 2013 at 20:52 in reply to #389430 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

Thanks.

0
Posted 15 August 2013 at 20:51 in reply to #389435 on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

The only true problem i see with this deck is that you rely on getting four cards which can be hard, especially in a mono red deck. Since red doesn't have much card draw (without discarding) so it is best to just expand your options.

Rubblebelt Maaka! I know it sounds stupid to add, but hear me out. Rubblebelt Maaka's bloodrush ability can be used as an alternative to Curse of Bloodletting. If you have five lands out then you can attack with your giant, Bloodrush Rubblebelt maaka onto him (making him a ten powered creature) and continue to Fling and Reverberate for a kill. This also works as an Alternative to either of your copying spells.

Now this doesn't really help your deck out that much, but it can be really fun! Depending on if the deck you are playing against uses large creatures as well, you could use items like Act of Treason and then Fling their own creature at them.

I always hate when people tell you what to add in without telling you what to take out, and without thinking about how those changes could effect how the deck plays. So i kinda hate how Im doing that to you right now, but I am honestly not sure what to take out or how any of this will effect the deck. My apologies.

I know this may not be a big help, but it was all I could scrounge up at this moment. Let me know if you need help on anything in specific.

1
Posted 15 August 2013 at 20:46 as a comment on Flinga-dinga-do! (stand/Bugt)

Permalink

181-200 of 279 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Last