HotPoloPlayer

19 Decks, 290 Comments, 151 Reputation

It isn't about having the most mana possible. It is about filling your hand with as many land cards as possible, then discarding them to Zombie Infestation's ability.

Even though the transmute would be useful, it adds another nonland card to the deck which increases your chances of running in to it with Treasure Hunt. The sooner you run into a nonland card, the worse things get.

Im not sure about Contested War Zone, but i think he said in a few comments that it was added in jokingly.

1
Posted 07 September 2013 at 21:47 in reply to #395302 on Did I just win?

Permalink

I think what really doesn't make sense is simply that it costs twelve mana. This deck isn't made to get that many land onto the battlefield, its made to film your had up with land so that you can discard it all with Zombie Infestation.

2
Posted 07 September 2013 at 19:04 in reply to #395009 on Did I just win?

Permalink

Good news! Can't wait to see what else Theros can bring to this deck.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 09:20 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

Ok, haha! I'll accept a 50/50 credit. If you can add Angel of Serenity after Theros comes out that's be great! But adding in Angel of Serenity and Angelic Skirmisher might hurt the mana curve.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 08:16 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

"Good call on removing mutavault. The best deck for him is a sliver deck. That being said, Blind Obedience is the best extort card available. Sphere of Safety would also be a solid add for this deck. Also, Strionic Resonator can copy Archangel's ability, giving all your creatures +2/+2 for 2 mana. Path of Bravery and Angelic Accord would also rock in this deck." That was Dudeface's first comment, and it points out both Path of Bravery and Blind Obedience.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 07:27 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

That was actually DudeFace, but whateves.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 07:12 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

Awesome, man! Congrats!

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 06:53 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

Woop woop! Boon-chicka boom-chicka! (Repeat that about 200 times and you have an awesome electronica song.)

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 01:19 in reply to #395143 on Green/White lifegain

Permalink

You can. Mouse over the name and a button that says edit should appear.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 01:12 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

Itsmagic, have you ever heard the term "don't feed the trolls?"

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 00:16 in reply to #394387 on Devil Boy

Permalink

Unforeseen, i hope you never have to play legacy.

4
Posted 06 September 2013 at 23:21 in reply to #395087 on Did I just win?

Permalink

Why did you repost it if all you did was change the name?

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 22:33 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

I don't even... What?

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 22:32 in reply to #394387 on Devil Boy

Permalink

I wonder why...

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 09:06 in reply to #394387 on Devil Boy

Permalink

That'd work.

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 07:47 in reply to #394837 on Swamp

Permalink

Isn't 6 to 8 +1/+1 counters enough? And as i said before, you don't want to make a deck that is too dependent on one card.

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 00:52 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

That would be fine, but it might be hard for people to find. You'd need a good amount of people commenting on it for it to really work.

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 00:50 in reply to #394837 on Swamp

Permalink

No problem.

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 23:20 in reply to #394302 on Standard: $25 Inf Mill Turn 4

Permalink

And i'm being generally awesome. Cause that's how the HotPoloPlayer do!

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 23:15 in reply to #394302 on Standard: $25 Inf Mill Turn 4

Permalink

Honestly, i'm not sure if Angelic Accord is good for this deck. I'm not saying it's bad, i just want to make sure that you can gain four life each turn to use it properly. It's another high mana costing card and would be almost dead if you can't gain that four life. If you have Archangel of Thune out then it's great, but relying on her too much will make this deck unreliable. However if you do gain a solid four life almost every turn then go for it! If you do add Angelic Accord, i would take out one Desecration Demon, one Fiendslayer Paladin and one Lifebane zombie. The reason i suggest you take out one Desecration Demon is because he is mainly just a big bomb in this deck, but so is Angelic Accord. Having 12 different big bomb cards in a deck is too many, but 10 will be a little more manageable.

0
Posted 05 September 2013 at 20:57 in reply to #394255 on Angelic Desecration

Permalink

61-80 of 279 items