raggedjoe

147 Decks, 1,087 Comments, 107 Reputation

Thanks man. I wish I could say I designed this worldclass deck, but as I said, it isnt mine. I would like to thing that my modifications (including all the card draw) enhances the deck though.

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 12:39 in reply to #105899 on Faeries

Permalink

Any other opinions?

0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 14:24 as a comment on Kothlord RDW

Permalink

Ahah, I understand the distinction. And I understand the sentiment expressed in your quote too. I know you like to do a lot of "magic number" stuff, take a look at this deck. You built a deck around the number 3, maybe a simular structure works around the number 4? I am asking because I have noticed the ratios seen in this deck (both card type and mana curve) in many aggro decks recently. The 4 artifacts are flexible, I've seen decks exactly like mine but have 4 enchantments, or 4 planeswalkers (Jace 1.0 in a BLUE aggro deck my friend has), or simply 24 lands instead of 20.

0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 14:20 in reply to #105512 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Too bad the curve breaks if i do another 2 for 2 Dark Rituals :(

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 18:34 as a comment on Extraction

Permalink

Oh wow. He's a boss. I want 4.

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 18:33 in reply to #105505 on Extraction

Permalink

Love the name. The deck? Ehhh... good, but nothing special.

1
Posted 14 December 2010 at 18:25 as a comment on Stomp on Eden

Permalink

Awww. What does it take to be "evil". Trust me, people loathe playing this deck... though I got some control decks that are worse....

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 18:23 in reply to #105512 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Eh, I thought about him, but I dont think his ability will be too useful in an aggro deck, and running the Lacerators instead gives me more guys to swing with. Under normal conditions it is hard to block so many vamps. With the removal thrown in (why the hell isnt Vendetta in ever back aggro deck?), its impossible.

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 18:21 in reply to #105567 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Ok, I gave in and threw them in... You guys were right! I didnt think the deck could get sicker, but it did.

Surewhynot, does this qualify as 'evil'?

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 20:57 as a comment on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

How did I miss Urge to Feed? I play this deck and they are in it in real life... I musta been not paying attention.

I'm still not digging the Bloodghast.... I dont even have any sac mechanic in here at all. Yes e is a boss. No, I am not convinced he should be in here. Feel free to give me reasons though, you may change my mind

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 16:20 in reply to #105458 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Nice deck. Serra Ascendants are your god though, you need them. 1 mana for a guy who is 6/6 flying lifelink if you are at 30+ life

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 16:16 as a comment on life=good

Permalink

I love Bloodghast as much if not more than you (take a look at how much of my decks are black), but they simply dont got a spot in this deck

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 16:13 in reply to #105454 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

What would you have me take out? The Nighhawks?

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 16:07 in reply to #105454 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

The key to a fast vampire deck is having small guys hitting for damage every turn... I would reccomend dropping: Bloodghast, Butcher of Malakir, Viscera Seer, Anowon, the Ruin Sage, Disentomb. Throw in more guys like Vampire Lacerator and Guul Draz Vampire. If you want ideas, check out my rediculously fast vampire aggro deck, Vampire Blitzkreig

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 16:05 as a comment on Vamp Standard Need Help

Permalink

Thanks! I actually think this deck is a better 1st game because it is more stable and stronger against Blue, and it can be SBed into a more traditional RDW deck. I also find the possibility of 4 MTM is nice.

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 15:46 in reply to #105328 on Kothlord RDW

Permalink

You suck

That's What I have to say to you good sir.

Actually, this is an interesting idea, especially if it can be modified to be anti-elves too. I kinda like it.

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 15:42 as a comment on RDL -- An "anti" deck

Permalink

Wow. I've been wondering why LMC isn't banned actually... There are a few other ways to break cards with it (including an infinite damage combo thats T2)

0
Posted 12 December 2010 at 18:30 as a comment on Land Destruction (Green)

Permalink

Because I don't own any lol. Also, I think his ability only activates if he is cast from your hand.

0
Posted 12 December 2010 at 18:23 in reply to #105200 on Mass Polymorph

Permalink

Totaly...
Extractor: "Lets see... I'll take your Hydra, and your Leatherback, and your Compainion..."
Stomy: "Fml"

0
Posted 12 December 2010 at 17:23 in reply to #105274 on Extraction

Permalink

You need some card-draw... In my draw-tests you run outa cards by turn 2 or 3. I would recomend Thirst for Knowlage or Thoughtcast

0
Posted 11 December 2010 at 15:51 as a comment on To Affinity and Beyond!

Permalink

981-1,000 of 1,087 items