RobM

380 Decks, 219 Comments, 177 Reputation

Would put it in if it were not for the high casting cost. I like it, but I feel like if you were to cast it, you had already won anyways. Probably god-tier in a multiplayer game though.

0
Posted 20 April 2015 at 19:22 in reply to #546403 on Derevi, Tryhard Tactician

Permalink

But it's so delicious, they can't do anything! Muahahahaha!

0
Posted 20 April 2015 at 19:18 in reply to #546495 on Derevi, Tryhard Tactician

Permalink

I don't understand Drown in Sorrow in this deck, it just kills 2/3 of your creatures. I mean sure it might be good later in the game when you have a big beatstick out, but this is aggro, why would you need to invest in lategame? Sorry for the somewhat harsh criticism, but I just find it odd that Drown in Sorrow would be in an aggro deck.

0
Posted 19 April 2015 at 05:40 as a comment on Friday Budget: A Cruel Soul

Permalink

As much as I do like both of the cards, I feel they are too slow for this deck.

0
Posted 12 April 2015 at 17:49 in reply to #545470 on Budget: Delicious Artifacts

Permalink

I have no idea if this deck is any good, but rakdos heroic is the new meta.

3
Posted 12 April 2015 at 11:59 as a comment on Budget Decks: Rakdos Heroic?

Permalink

KedeREKT Creeper, This deck can't lose.

1
Posted 05 April 2015 at 07:49 as a comment on Budget Decks: Sweet Victory

Permalink

Of course it is, just take out a swamp! But damn son, it raises the price by a whopping 0.25$.

0
Posted 05 April 2015 at 05:10 in reply to #544406 on EDH Budget: Maralen Storm

Permalink

10/10 for using Calcium Man.

0
Posted 27 March 2015 at 22:39 as a comment on Budget EDH: Ruthless Vizier

Permalink

Bitterblossom reported for costing 45$

0
Posted 26 March 2015 at 17:58 in reply to #543105 on Budget: Killing Yourself

Permalink

I see, well if you want to make your deck more viable or consistent I do suggest running playsets of cards to ensure a high chance of drawing into that specific card. But if you cannot obtain multiple copies of cards and you're not really playing in a competetive environment then honestly I see no problem.

Sure a deck with only singles isn't competetive enough to beat tournament decks, but you can still have fun playing with your friends. There are many ways of playing Magic, find your way and have fun.

1
Posted 25 March 2015 at 14:15 in reply to #542956 on Modern-esque take on Naya

Permalink

I just gotta ask, why so many 1 ofs of cards? I'd understand if this was a singleton deck, but nowhere have you mentioned that this is one. Just a bit confused.

0
Posted 25 March 2015 at 13:33 as a comment on Modern-esque take on Naya

Permalink

While I do appreciate the advice, splashing another colour to help with defense doesn't feel right to me. This deck is obviously a very casual deck and meant for a bit of fun. So the gameplan is to either kill yourself or to barely kill your enemy without losing yourself.

As for your suggestion on murder, it really depends on your local meta. If people run zombies, vampires and werewolves then maybe it isn't the best removal, but otherwise it's really good. So I think it's more of a "meta call" on which removal you'd rather use.

Thanks for the advice, even if they don't really fit the deck in my opinion. I do agree that the deck needs more defensive options to make it viable, but like I said, casual deck.

0
Posted 25 March 2015 at 13:00 in reply to #542948 on Budget: Killing Yourself

Permalink

If I may make a suggestion, do you think Genju of the realm has a place in this deck? Other than that it's a pretty cool deck, I like the usage of the "Ultimatum-like" cards. And even if I don't exactly know what Cromat is, he looks alright.

0
Posted 22 March 2015 at 06:50 as a comment on Budget EDH: Master of Elements

Permalink

Elspeth Sun's Champion is a balanced card in a token strategy and Brutal Hordechief is, well, brutal...
Mardu ascendancy is nice, but it not triggering only off nontoken creatures is a bummer (Imagine an infinite loop, balanced).

0
Posted 21 March 2015 at 07:57 as a comment on Mardu tokens

Permalink

The whole deck was just a silly idea that came to me while thinking of deck ideas. I am a fairly new player, but I do know some things, but Myr Cruel Ultimatum just sounded so stupid to me that I had to do it. Thanks for the tip on Myr Galvaniser though, he can help with ramping a lot and I didn't even know such a card existed. This by no means is supposed to be an actual viable Cruel Ultimatum deck and is meant to be something silly.

0
Posted 16 March 2015 at 14:37 in reply to #541776 on Myr Cruel Ultimatum

Permalink

Me attack with big scary giant. Giant smash face of enemy, is good strategy. I is approve of deck, who need fancy spell when you have giant!

4
Posted 27 February 2015 at 17:47 as a comment on Budget Decks: Gigantic Rage

Permalink

LOL What the fuck is going on here?

2
Posted 23 February 2015 at 14:44 in reply to #537500 on Budget Decks: Dragon Babies!

Permalink

Glad you like it! I hate the idea of taking away the absolutely essential swamps away from the sideboard, but I guess it isn't completely game losing.

0
Posted 22 February 2015 at 16:09 in reply to #537594 on Budget: This is my Swamp

Permalink

I can imagine he'd do pretty well in the sideboard against deck which stall the game out, swapped out the Ogre Battledrivers for two of him. I don't know if he's mainboard playable because of his high casting cost with this being an aggro deck, but I really appreciate the advice. He'd definetely be in the mainboard if he had the bloodrush ability.

0
Posted 22 February 2015 at 16:07 in reply to #537595 on Budget: Mind if I Smash You?

Permalink

Ghostfire blade synergy with morph tokens is pretty sexy. Morph is pretty cool in general, playing mindgames with your opponent. I can almost feel my opponent writhe in agony trying to play around morph tokens. Simply delicious.

1
Posted 18 February 2015 at 18:34 as a comment on Budget Decks: Transmorphers

Permalink

161-180 of 217 items