Ah. Gotcha. Shows how often I go to tourneys.
Permalink
And what exactly is the point of this nonsense?
I'm not saying this is intended for copying, but that will be one of the worst side effects. People just getting into the game will go out and buy these decks and not put in the time to learn the game like the rest of us. It happens in every sport. It's the "rich kid" effect. People go out and get the best equipment available for whatever hobby they are picking up and don't build up their chops on the crap that most people start with. I also play guitar and paintball, and have seen it hundreds of times. Daddy goes out and buys kids a brand new Les Paul and Marshall half-stack (guitar) or E-Tek Ego (paintball) and they don't develop skills that can only be learned from having to use a $90 Takimine acoustic (guitar) or Tippmann (paintball).
You are missing my point entirely.
Yes, I'm gay even though you don't understand why he's posting them. He's posting these decks in order for people to more easily follow the top decks in standard, something that belongs on the forums. I'm glad to see more name calling when I have done nothing to provoke it, especially from anyone other than Cakins(Blightning).
Way to go aether. Couldn't have said it better myself. Learning how to do something isn't work. If a player wants to be fed a deck they can buy and win with, they're going to get frustrated when they lose and don't understand that it's because they were up against a player with a better knowledge of the game. While I can see the point of what you're doing and understand the need for it, I think that it belongs in the forum, not on here. I did not mean to offend when I originally posted on your decks, but I guess it's the curse of the ignorant (please remember that calling someone ignorant is not an insult) to take offense.
Do YOU click a link when you read a deck description? Didn't think so.
This is pretty much the exact same as my Treefolk deck was last year. May I suggest Cream of the Crop, Lignify, and Wickerbough Elder?
Once Worldwake comes out, you might look into at least splashing green for all those creatures that you can tap to untap a land. With two or three of them, you wouldn't really need Ring of Brighthearth.
+1 for the Family Guy reference.
Sweet deck though. +1.
look for a way to remove a creature's ability at the beginning of your upkeep. the counter goes away, but you don't have to sacrifice the creature.
Yup. Replication would be cool though, something like Followed Footsteps, but right now I'd focus on adding more Relentless Rats.
Easy fix: Coat of Arms
And that's turn 6 on a bad draw.
Turn 6? Whatever.
I like it, but I might have to agree Lemonzest, but for a different reason. Who cares about when the replication comes out? Why not add more ways to protect your rats from mass removal?
Unless this is an EDH deck, it could really use some clean up work. Having a few singles is one thing, but every card?
Oh, so Cakins is behind this. I really hope they allow us to block communications soon, because you are one of the most abusive, ignorant, and intolerant people on this site. When will you understand that people don't look at every deck someone makes? When you write a research paper in school (which, based on your intelligence level, you did not complete), you still have to write a bibliography even though you're written 500 previous research papers. Read a book. You might learn something.
Sorry, 331.
221-240 of 1,188 items