RoughneckBarbarian

Not bad. I'd like to see a Patriarch's Bidding paired up with those Noxious Ghouls.

It's all in the game play and the bluff. I focus more on the wider view of the game than the other guy instead of just seeing what cards he has on table. I make sure I know if he has a hand, about how many cards are in it, and how long certain cards have been in there if I can. Hell, I even try to figure out how he arranges his hand so I have an idea of what he draws based on where he puts it. I also try to be as inconsistent as possible, such as putting cards in my hand in random places or arranging my cards to suggest something's important when it's not. It's amazing just how much a person's sub-conscience shows in how they do things.

if I find the person that gave this a -1 without commenting, I will eat your heart while your family watches.

+1 so that you're back even.

Took out Konda's Banner because I just realized that colorless creatures can't share a color.

You sure this isn't a highlander or edh deck?

I'm not saying it's original. Just my take on it. For the record, I will never EVER use Progenitus for any reason EVER unless it's some hilariously hair-breained scheme. And I have a deck for that.

Thanks everyone. I'm STILL not happy with Keldon Warlord or Soul Foundry. What do you think about Sensei Golden-Tail and General Takeno to replace them? I'm also considering Braid of Fire for the simple fact that Shattering spree is in this deck. We still play mana burn (because it's such a HUGE part of the game), but with Balthor out, I think I could manage. Also, what do you think I should shave off in order to add Browbeat? I didn't realize how much I used that card until it was gone.

The crying is just a bluff. I'm the only one that sees the Dragon Broodmother on the table and a Rise of the Hobgoblins in my hand. Tee hee!

I wasn't until they made him, Balthor, and Lovisa barbarians. Those three creatures make him a 6/6... Destruction tactics should always be watched with a creature based deck.

Thanks for liking it even though it's over 60 cards. Multiplayer is as different from 1v1 as Al Sharpton is to Dick Cheaney and few people get that.

I'm glad you like it, 'nox. I've never had one card solve all the problems I had in a deck before. I think I'm gonna split my barbs into three decks. I don't want to, but I don't have anyone to talk me out of cards I've become attached to (Balthor, Jeska, and Kamahl).

What a fanstactic fucking idea! Morph?! You're damned genius! +500

lol. Thanks man.

Touche, sir...

lol. Thanks Parasitic. I assume you know which one the title's from?

Thanks gocubsgo.

Pollenbright Wings and Verdant Embrace are REQUIRED! Tukatongue and Shell-Dweller have never really done anything for me. You might look into Sporesower Thallid and Psycotrope Thallid to replace them if you feel the same. This deck could also use some balancing. If it were me, I'd trade a Mycologist and Sigil Captain for 2 Sporoloth Ancients, add three copies of Pollenbright Wings and Verdant Embrace, and add 2 copies of Garruk. your lands will easily support a 70 card deck the way they are.

As do I. If I could be one card: Kamahl. if I were a card and could marry another card: Lovisa.

I didn't realize you were telling em to put some in. Duh. I have 4 of them in my current barbarians, but, as I said, I'm staying away from across the board buffs to focus on individual creatures.

Agreed.

I think you're right. I'm finding all kinds of ways to abuse it, but they all involve multiple 2-3 card combos.

Or Nature's Resurgence right before a Blightning.