try signal pest maybe
Permalink
ok just wanted to hear your argumnts, but im pretty sure Bloom Tender only taps for G in this deck: the rulings: For each color (white, blue, black, red, and green), check to see if you control a permanent of that color. You can count the same permanent for multiple colors. For example, if you control a green enchantment and a white-black creature, Bloom Tender's ability produces {W}{B}{G}. 8/1/2008 Bloom Tender won't add more than one mana of any particular color to your mana pool. At most, it will produce {W}{U}{B}{R}{G}.
because its pretty crucial to get 3 mana on turn 2. Im not saying the deck is bad im just asking for your oppinion
why dont you have any manaelves like llanowar elf, fyndhorn elf or arbor elf?
I thought that too, but to me it just seemed like it wouldnt be worth it
good reasoning
why play ambush viper when you can play more efficent removal in fx doom blade?
is this for competetive legacy, because mystical is banned
it looks really nice, is it for standart play? Because preordain is not in standart
looks like legacy affinity
this looks a lot like SI. Have you considered infernal contract instead of sign in blood ?
why not 4 flagstones of troika ?
i would cut some of the creatures
have you considered hymn to Tourach?
looks good. have you considered smother?
add goblin guide
nice, it looks really good
I would play 4 brainstorm
yes, the sideboard is weak and this deck isnot legacy legal
this deck is not bad, but I just dont understand why affinity needs a card like HS. Affinity has never had a problem with getting its creatures into play. I also think thats there are too many nonbos in the deck. For example: HS+memnite, HS+Ravager. HS is also a very bad topdeck. A lot of good affinity cards are also missing. For example diciple of the vault, frogmite and signal pest. the mana also seems wierd. only 3 mox opals and 3 ancient den's.
281-300 of 357 items