Mark-023

110 Decks, 138 Comments, 5 Reputation

Saw it, but my problem is simply the game plan: I do recognize, first and foremost, the brutal speed an Infect deck has, because, after all, Mono G is a Tier 2 deck. But, my build is based more as a midrange-control deck that focuses on value and creature support in the form of removal and counters, instead of just one sack of eggs in one basket. That said, that deck of yours needs dual lands in order to work properly, at least 6-8, and pump spells that can protect your creatures (if dead with all ze pumps, it won't work)

0
Posted 02 September 2015 at 02:14 in reply to #560688 on BUG Infect

Permalink

At first thought, discard suite actually does a good job at taxing enemy decks, but the price tag of Thoughtseize may be a bit too much for a "budget" deck, so that was my reasoning to go for Duress instead (especially since creatures can be killed easily, a spell is harder to interact with). Next, Thalia and Gaddock both help, but with the low curve of modern decks, Teeg can be a bit off, so it could belong to the SB. Elspeth is a nice one and I'll test two of em instead of Sorin. And Goyf...well, that one is a bit too pricey to end games for me (at least, if someone wants to use this build, by all means slip at least 3)

0
Posted 18 December 2014 at 05:00 in reply to #523167 on Abzan Stax

Permalink

While the idea was born out of casual while reading the mothership's archives, what do you think it can bring in order to be full competitive, aside from the mana base?

0
Posted 17 December 2014 at 05:40 in reply to #523167 on Abzan Stax

Permalink

I know, but it counts as a fixer and extra permanent to exile to Descent, that was my reason to include it in this list

0
Posted 17 December 2014 at 05:39 in reply to #523169 on Abzan Stax

Permalink

It looks like a decent idea, but the creatures and the support suite are pretty lacking, and also, SnarlingToes, DON'T SPAM. With that heavy curve, 23-24 lands work best, too bomb dependant for the weenies to be unnoticed

-3
Posted 09 July 2013 at 16:52 as a comment on B/W Dark Heaven

Permalink

No spam please

0
Posted 09 July 2013 at 15:00 in reply to #375496 on Jarad's Undercity

Permalink

Normally, the biggest interaction Slither has besides of a chump block, is with Lotleth Troll, to gain two +1/+1 counters without paying mana, but I think that card is a little underrated, as it can serve as a sac outlet to Bone Splinters and Launch Party, or as a form of turing Unleash creatures off blocking in the case that they entered without the counter

0
Posted 25 November 2012 at 16:22 in reply to #305087 on Flashback Zombies

Permalink

Slitherhead works as a chump blocker, or a +1/+1 counter, depending on where it is, or a sac outlet to Bone Splinters. Shambler can work as an evasive creature on black decks, or an aggro approach as a Zombie, and can serve well beyond death due to Scavenge, but the Skaab only works as a robust defender, so I would leave it out. Seeing your SB, I think you could cut a Stitched Drake for an extra Ruinator, due to size differences and the resilience the Ruinator brings as it's able to be casted from GY

0
Posted 04 November 2012 at 13:02 in reply to #301530 on Flashback Zombies

Permalink

Bombo is what is called a combo that seems it could work, but it doesn't really,because of rulings, there are a lot of them. If you wish to use a different removal than Slips, the other option at the same mana is Bone Splinters (sorcery, destroy a creature at the cost of a creature sacrifice). Because of the Zombie approach, I would advice to run the full set of Captains, due to the bonus and the resilience of pinging 1 life for every death, cutting one Armored Skaab. And the Alchemies work very nicely to fill the graveyard, although for this deck, you could run Forbidden or the Twists. About the lands, for a deck that its curve ends at 5, you can safely 22-23, and I would advise using Desolate Lighthouse to fill the graveyard while drawing cards at the same time. For the Ruinator, main deck I feel the same that you: a lack of creatures to exile, but it could work as an SB one

0
Posted 03 November 2012 at 13:32 as a comment on Flashback Zombies

Permalink

I did see that deck, and the main problem is that the proposed game plan is diluted into very different ideas: a Zombie approach, Burning Vengeance and milling targeting the opponent. Issue? Not so many removal from main (Sever the Bloodline is dead if you encounter things with hexproof) and SB (the Pharaoh only works in the GY, that can be hosed), lack of spells that activate on graveyard outside of Gravecrawler, and a ratio of more creatures than flashback spells. Check my comment for the rest, but other than that, the deck is a very nice concept

0
Posted 03 November 2012 at 02:16 in reply to #301359 on Milling Darkness

Permalink

Nice idea, but I disgress on some points, like the use of the Vengeance as the only form of removal, the ratio on creatures/spells (due to the dual nature of the game plan, and being that Vengeance works a lot better with flashbacks than Gravecrawler only), and SB. For starters, I advise some burn or Tragic Slips (due to the amount of sacrifice you are able to generate), cutting the Screeching Skaabs and one Sever the Bloodline for Searing Spears. Havengul Lich does not feel like a good inclusion here, and I would advice using an extra Ghoulcaller for that effect, in case of going the Zombie approach.
For SB, try to run Duress, as it can be one form or getting rid of graveyard hate, as well as counterspells (Negate, Dissipate, etc.), instead of a 3rd-4th Grimoire and Alchemist (and Alchemist is a bombo if you decide to bring the Grimoire also, as the ability hoses the very creatures you want to reanimate)

0
Posted 03 November 2012 at 02:07 as a comment on Flashback Zombies

Permalink

Oh, and BTW, if you wish to see my actual Standard deck, here is the link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=278506

0
Posted 02 November 2012 at 15:14 in reply to #297956 on Golgari Recycling

Permalink

The case with the Shamblers and Manglers, is of their Scavenge price, to spread the curve as much as possible to prevent mana problems, and because of the Shamblers evasion, that can serve pretty nicely. If you wish to cut down the shamblers, try to use an evasive (flying, unblockable, or intimidate) that can serve as a makeshift closer with the Scavenge counters (that happens to be the main idea of the deck).

0
Posted 02 November 2012 at 15:11 in reply to #297956 on Golgari Recycling

Permalink

Not a bad idea, but I disgress on the amount of counters, because of possible mana constraints, if possible use things like Force of Will/Foil/Daze (they are free spells). Other things to watch: replace Convolute for Mana Leak, Leak is cheaper and is not as hindered by the extra 1 mana requirement of Convolute, and remove the Remove Soul for something more like the classic Counterspell (that lifts more weight for its price).
Speaking of SB, I must ask: what are you trying to do with the 15 cards?

0
Posted 24 October 2012 at 00:22 as a comment on Counter Deck

Permalink

The problem comparing Plummet with Predation, is the same that plagues comparing Naturalize with Natural End: sure the lifegain could prove very useful, but is that minimal difference worth the extra mana?
If I wanted pure life gain I would go for Gnaw to the Bone, as it is a instant, life gain only, that for only 3 mana, it could boost more than 12-14 life, and also has flashback to boot.

0
Posted 19 October 2012 at 13:59 in reply to #297956 on Golgari Recycling

Permalink

While I initally considered bordeline unplayable, on Prerelease I remembered the power level increase of Slitherhead with the Corpsejack. 3 of them are going in, but in what place do you think they go: main, or SB?

0
Posted 18 October 2012 at 15:19 in reply to #297704 on Golgari Recycling

Permalink

For me, when using a high profile morbid card, is to be able to consistently turn it on, regardless of what the opponent is doing, and regardless of combat, that is why an argument for Splinters can be made, especially if you don't use sacrifices yourself. If you think you can use morbid consistently, go for Slips, otherwise, stick to Splinters, especially with the Crawlers plan.

1
Posted 15 October 2012 at 21:44 in reply to #296885 on Eternal Invasion

Permalink

I use 3 Dregs myself, and are an aggro thing to death, boasting 3 power for 3, and haste to boot. It also counts as a Zombie, for Crawler and Captain purposes, so a 3rd one increases the power level very nicely.
Seeing your removal, I'd swap 2 Spliters for 2 extra Slips, due to the fact of morbid turning on because of Grim

1
Posted 15 October 2012 at 19:22 in reply to #296885 on Eternal Invasion

Permalink

Nice idea, but I kinda disagree on Vraska's ultimates, as the Assassins are quite fragile in themselves, and I would suggest you take Endless Ranks, for an extra Dreg Mangler. I agree on Snakerunners comment of taking out the Slitherheads unless you run Corpsejack Menace, to make scavenge more viable.
Out of deck comment: if you thought I restrict myself to Casual, here's my Standard list on this days: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=278506

0
Posted 15 October 2012 at 18:34 as a comment on Eternal Invasion

Permalink

Thanks for the comment, and I DO play Standard, just not this one, hence the appearance of Ponder instead of Index. The thing going with Smuggler, is to get more value out of the ETB detainers like the justiciar and Skyknight, and this decks stays casual, as I'm working on two standard decks on this moment

0
Posted 15 October 2012 at 18:30 in reply to #296869 on Azorius Detaining

Permalink

1-20 of 122 items

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last