tmw30

63 Decks, 229 Comments, 52 Reputation

I'm testing a version of this deck with a G/B mana base with no actual main deck green spells. The sideboard contains two green spells: a four of golgari charm and a 3 of abrupt decay. The reason for this is that most decks in my meta are carrying four of sided leylines and 2-3 of chalice of the voids, both can be a blowout. Those two cards fix the problems. I'd suggest trying it out, as thus far, I have had nothing but positive feedback from my win count. Just something to consider trying out.

Plus, as an added bonus, for 2-3 turns they think you're some sort of messed up Jund or the Rock, lol.

Actually, here's it's list, it might be of use to you:

http://www.mtgvault.com/tmw30/decks/gb-8rack/

0
Posted 17 September 2014 at 17:16 as a comment on 8 Rack Modern

Permalink

Yeah, I guess it makes sense... Usually when I see a wall of Revence, there's a 10/10 beater following it, so it's just odd to me.

0
Posted 05 September 2014 at 22:55 in reply to #500830 on Wall...Control?

Permalink

But Siege Dragon, man!

In all seriousness, this is a cool deck. Still, wall of reverence might not be the best choice... It gain's life equal to power, not toughness.

0
Posted 05 September 2014 at 20:23 as a comment on Wall...Control?

Permalink

A walker EDH without Doubling Season, huh? Interesting, it's a very abusable interaction. I mean, it's still fun, but what about that Ult as soon as it comes out? Also, might I suggest Sliver Overlord as the commander for this deck? All of the slivers in this deck are simply for value's sack, and he will let you dig them out and apply, which I think I would prefer as the general instead of Queen. Hell, with him you can just tutor the Queen if you want it.

0
Posted 30 August 2014 at 00:01 as a comment on Walker Texas ranger.

Permalink

Capsize is soooo good in pauper. Game winning, in fact. I'd suggest it over Into the Roil, but I can see the argument against it.

0
Posted 28 August 2014 at 15:37 as a comment on Budget Decks: Pauper Player

Permalink

Incorrect, sir. Strict Superiority isn't acquired here, although in most constructed formats I suppose it might be.

Sedge Scorpion is common, so in limited it is a more available green removal option, meaning it is superior in terms of availability.

Also, dat flavor text.

And in eternal formats, skullclamp is better with Sedge Scorpion.

I could go on, but really, he should be running the viper.

0
Posted 26 August 2014 at 17:12 in reply to #497996 on Vraska the unseen/Comments ple

Permalink

Actually, I'm quite jealous of that... chain lightning is among my favorite red spells. It's a very, very fun card to cast... it has the potential to become quite destructive.

Edit: Still, jealous, my chain lightning are the most current reprint. :P

0
Posted 24 August 2014 at 18:28 in reply to #497249 on B/R 8-Rack Proactive/Reactive

Permalink

Oh, and sorta as a post, post script, the lightning bolts I use are beta... so they're worth a pretty penny a well.

1
Posted 24 August 2014 at 08:06 in reply to #497249 on B/R 8-Rack Proactive/Reactive

Permalink

Heh, not bragging on my "skills" so to say, I'm simply stating I play a hell of a lot of discard... Been doing it for years, it just feels more accurate than countering things blindly. So to start off my analysis of your comment (which was insightful, thank you), the reason for not running self discard is simple resource allocation. In the scenario that I do indeed need to discard cards, it is notable that any of the discard spells label target player, not target opponent. Many times I have Wrench Minded myself to hit the Ensnaring bridge quota. This deck in particular is indeed modern, if I were playing legacy/vintage, it would not be approachable in the same regard due to the metagame being so different... the Rack is not exactly a great finisher there against competitive builds. Regardless of all that, I like your friends deck. It's a true black discard, and I love that sort of thing. My French EDH plays a lot like it, just with a large dosage of reanimation on the side.
The deck you see before you is only expensive because of 12 cards really, heh, and there are actually "budget" options for them. For instance, Liliana of the Veil, who accounts for 280 dollars of the deck's value, is easily replaced with Necrogen Mists, which only faults in that it can't be used as an Edict. The marsh flats, which absorb 140 dollars of the burden, can just be Sulphrous springs.

Thanks for the comment, it's good to get some sort of feedback (any, really) on a creation.

Oh, and sorta as a post-script, the reason I prefer the Rack to Nihil Stone is because of the late-game viability of the individual cards. In a 13th turn top-deck, the Rack is FAAAAAR superior. Besides, Nihil Stone is absolutely useless against Affinity, my worst match-up.

1
Posted 24 August 2014 at 07:18 in reply to #497249 on B/R 8-Rack Proactive/Reactive

Permalink

You know, I'm not sure how I feel about the Hymn to Tourach in Modern idea. As a discard player, and I repeat, a huge discard player, I know the power of Hymn. It can outright win you games by eliminating access to quintessential parts of an opponents deck on the second turn. Now, while I would LOVE that in modern, especially with the limited ability the format gives to come back from such dire straits, I would not love to see my opponent cringe every time I tapped two mana. Mind Wrench is fine in that slot, it's not broken like Hymn is. If Hymn were to come into Modern, everyone would probably start playing a variant of one of my lists... and that seems lame.

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 20:06 as a comment on Cards that should be reprinted

Permalink

But stuffy doll is already indestructible...

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 03:30 in reply to #497097 on Stuffy Burn(modern)

Permalink

I would have probably taken out the Indestructabilities, but that's just me I suppose. I just don't like them, heh.

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 03:26 in reply to #497097 on Stuffy Burn(modern)

Permalink

Glad I could be of assistance.

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 02:53 in reply to #497094 on Vraska the unseen/Comments ple

Permalink

Blasphemous act would be extremely satisfying here.

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 02:51 as a comment on Stuffy Burn(modern)

Permalink

Diabolic tutor is sorta a weak card in standard... all it does is add 4 onto the mana cost of the answer to a problem. Well, in your deck, you don't really have answers to problems, more so you have the answers to the entire game... creatures. So, I recommend you replace the tutors with Grisly Salvages. It functions as a pseudo-drawspells and fills up your graveyard with scavenge at the same time. That's just my two cents.

0
Posted 23 August 2014 at 02:50 in reply to #497094 on Vraska the unseen/Comments ple

Permalink

Actually, notice how there is no RtR in this deck. I think what he's going for is a post-rotation build.

0
Posted 20 August 2014 at 18:12 in reply to #496513 on BUG T2

Permalink

Glad I could be of assistance. I look forward to hearing the results.

0
Posted 17 August 2014 at 05:11 in reply to #495407 on Mad Plans

Permalink

Also, if you want to get rid of those pesky lands after a selective memory, look into treasure hunt, it's glorious.

0
Posted 16 August 2014 at 23:08 in reply to #495407 on Mad Plans

Permalink

A solid design, but alas execution is difficult. In a land where lightning bolt rules, the poor Maniac is simply a fancy target. Never-the-less, I like your deck. If there's any wisdom I can hope to spread, it would be within the land base. 20 is a good amount of lands, according to simple probability, a third of all your cards should be lands. However, in a deck that needs to reliably hit leveler fifth turn, we see a problem. On the play, fifth turn, you've seen 11 cards in total. What this says is that a third of the cards seen have been lands, and unfortunately, that's not reliably 5. Now, it'd be crazy to go the necessary 50% land base required to "smooth" the curve, but I personally would recommend a healthy 40%, or 24 lands. I think statistically it would be a great boon to your deck, because running some sims of the deck haven't given spectacular results in the current form. If your willing to perhaps upgrades with some currency, remand>runeboggle, but I understand the budget argument. Once again, I really like your deck and wish you well in your endeavors with it.

0
Posted 16 August 2014 at 22:56 as a comment on Mad Plans

Permalink

Sphinx's Revelation would be brilliant in this deck, I would recommend it. Any Azorius styled deck can benefit from that cards caressing draw power.

0
Posted 01 July 2014 at 21:15 in reply to #476333 on How Congress Works

Permalink

41-60 of 225 items