not bad... check out my r/g that ive been playing at fnm the last few weeks.http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=401193
Permalink
i know what u are saying anbu. im just trying to troll a little. the stupid part is he was the only person i beat friday :P
on the double take, it could also be good to drop 1 huntmaster and the sanctifiers. thats the room u need for an extra fiend hunter and the 1 or 2 thragtusks you've been missing.
i think u should drop 1 angel of serenity, the lantern, and the overseer. maybe add another craterhoof and 2 more fiend hunters,or maybe o-rings instead. thats your decision. also i know this is human based but give griselbrand some consideration.
hey i saw u being cocky about your deck on the parish of lambholt page. i just thought id let u know i played someone who saw ur deck on here and downright duplicated it. he won fnm with it this passed friday. i lost to the jund that won 2nd so i didnt get matched up with him. after the fnm was over i played a 3 out of 5 with the guy. i won the match 3-0. your deck isnt unbeatable. it was kinda easy actually. here's what i beat "you" with. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=401193
one thing i wanna point out... descent doesnt specify a type of permanent. so eventually the descent into madness will make u exile descent into madness. i hope u get it cuz i dont know of an easier way to explain it.
also sir jayden i have a few more suggestions for you. 24 lands in a 60 card deck is a lot. i reccomend dropping to 22. also drop 1 krenko, drop the devotions, and 1 general. that gives u 5 more cards to work with and 22 lands is plenty for a 60 card deck. it would be best to use the 6 card slots on a 4th haunting, 4 lingering souls, and a 4th doomed traveler. the deck will run smoother and give u more options during your turns. also if u are questioning the lingering souls by the black flashback, dont worry about it just think of the card as a sorcery version of midnight haunting.
im sorry but your suggestion wasnt incredible. ;P that seems sort amateur-ish. you would think something like that would be good but the idea of this deck is to kill just as quick as u start win the board presence game. crusader of odric is good in some decks but if an opponent would overload electrickery or mizzium mortars, which are starting to be played more frequently, crusader will most likely be sitting there as a weenie 1/1. fervor is too good for this deck to drop for crusader, and krenko's command is basically a red version of raise the alarm and helps out krenko. this deck is constructed around speed and quick overrun and not weenies swinging with a biggie or two. that's why crusader isnt a good card for this deck.
blah is my opinion of this deck. here is what jund looks like.http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=413027
Also check out some of my decks by clicking on my user name. I'm on my phone right now so its hard to copy and paste deck links. Definately check out my deck called gruul. At fnm last night I did bad because I kept getting bad hands. But I played the guy who won 1st after the tournament and won 2-0. I was playing with the "gruul" deck and he was playing W/U control that completely shut down jund. The deck on this site is identical to my real life deck except for the shock lands.
No problem. As far as token decks go white red is as fun as its gonna get.
very nice! im very satisfied with this but there is one thing i want to point out that u might like. it would make this deck WAY better if u replace etheral armor with fervor. now that i think about it tho. sphere of safety isnt a good fit. tokens are all about aggro especially with hellrider, generals, and virtues. u should probably also try to drop 1 devotion and run 2 odrics in main along with 2 krenkos. think about this. u have out fervor, 3 red sources and 3 more lands. u drop a krenkos command, cast krenko and instantly tap him and you have 9 goblins to swing in. and if u have some virtues out, theyre in deep shit.
primal surge? it seems like ur deck is decent and fun. but primal surge might just be the card that's holding it back. one thing that worries me tho is that u say this is a mill deck. your only mill cards are jace and chronic flooding. you cant have 2 jaces out and u most like wont have many chronic floodings out either. at least not until mid to late game. also i see where u are going with primal surge, but with your only ramp being 3 farseeks it will very hard if not impossible to pull off. this deck is standard and 95% of standard decks right now are aggro. from what i can tell this deck doesnt have much defense aside from the counter spells and the sphere. fog bank is a good defender but he can easily be taken care of with any kill spell or burn spell. in my opinion u are trying to accomplish too many things at one time with this deck. it would be best for u to pick one and stick with it. im sorry if i seem like a dick but i just dont see this deck winning. i have no suggestions because i cant figure out what would be the best path for this deck whether it be mill elocutor defense or control.
u are going about this the wrong way!! the best way to pull of this deck is to have ONLY defender creatures. also the best thing to do would be to change the deck to U/G. then u dont have to worry about having the wrong type of mana. i dont feel like explaining what i mean so i want u to see for yourself. this is a defender mill deck. im not saying change it into mill, im just saying it would be best to use the same creatures and mana base (Green/Blue). also... run 4 fogs. btw dont use doorkeeper. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=412256
u should add a 4th volley. leave everything else the way it is. it wont hurt having 1 extra card.
not bad... might wanna put the knights in side board. from what it looks like u built the deck on what u have. try to get some sublime archangels. it might sound dumb but trust me. take a look.http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=393936
u have faithmender... but where's trostani!?
no problem aliski. also if u follow the above person's advice, those cards are more for side board. not only that Hunghunkachunk, it also depends on this person's area. zombies or vampires might not be as heavily played in this person's area as it is in others. also if u are looking for good low cost creatures i recommend fencing ace... here's why. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=400571
if your main focus is pumping up lambholt and parish, then u might want to drop nightshade peddler. if all of your creatures are bigger than or your opponents, and they cant blcok you, then deathtouch is pointless. also no creature in your deck requires more than 3 mana so i dont think somberwald sage is a good choice for this deck. you should probably consider dropping 1 mikaeus because he's legendary and replacing the sages with avacyn's pilgrims. also i would replace hunger of the howl pack with revenge of the hunted, but that's just me. fiend hunter is really good for this deck, but sometimes u play against a deck with a low creature count so you'll probably want to have oblivion ring in sideboard. rootborn defenses is also good but it might be a good idea to put it in side board and replace it with safe passage. or u could do it other way around. that's totally up to u. overall i think the deck is good and is probably fun. it just needs a few adjustments.
the same thing happens with unleash
121-140 of 174 items