Kazzong

401 Decks, 3,490 Comments, 885 Reputation

you do realiaze that this deck makes you LOSE in 1 turn right? not win... I am confused.

1
Posted 26 April 2012 at 02:27 in reply to #250055 on Turn One Loss, So Simple!

Permalink

you should throw in stoic rebuttal instead ofthe mana leaks. seeing as how it will cost you BB either way.

1
Posted 26 April 2012 at 02:22 as a comment on Artificial Sea

Permalink

love the swarmlord though.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 02:13 in reply to #250194 on Fast Infect

Permalink

not bad so far. I think perhaps the hex parasite isn't super effective. (I could be wrong here.) um, and I think that another drake would be good too.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 02:12 as a comment on Fast Infect

Permalink

dang I am sure that there is a card that ays that permanants you control can't have counters on them, but I can't remember what it is. :(

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 01:05 as a comment on Chro-NO-zoa

Permalink

ok, that is what I thought, though I wanted to be sure... :)

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:58 as a comment on Green Eldrazi Ramp(Format:Modern)

Permalink

very nice new combo. :)

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:56 in reply to #250150 on myr fury

Permalink

nice. I very much like it. :) heartless is just beastly. Love decks like this. again, I like the enginuity that it takes to make the. :)

1
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:55 as a comment on Heartless 1st Turn Kill - No Vintage Power Cards

Permalink

which walls woud you take out?

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:49 as a comment on Green Eldrazi Ramp(Format:Modern)

Permalink

I wonder how much of this combo is going to start popping up in FNM, and so forth.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:28 as a comment on 250th Deck

Permalink

I see... I guess that isn't perhaps they= way that I would have defined control, ut it makes sense. I see control as a little more literal. being able to take you opponents cards and use them against him/her.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:24 in reply to #248946 on Flash Control!

Permalink

RU control deck. "dream" deck, I think it is titled... Need to change that.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:15 in reply to #249903 on Time Warp/Panoptic Mirror Unlimited turns. Comments helpfull!!!

Permalink

??? that is pointed at...?

1
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:13 in reply to #250142 on Turn One Loss, So Simple!

Permalink

something else that you could do if you wanted to run that way is with treasure hunt. look at the top car of your library until you reveal a non land card, put all of those cards in your hand. Lol. :)

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 00:04 in reply to #249852 on The 260 card deck win

Permalink

one thing that I see is that you could swap out noble purpose for true conviction Same mana ost, but gives double strike. I see that you have the kinsbale cavalier, but only 2 of them. You could do 2 and 2 so that if you kinsbale gets taken out you could still have the double strike. just my opinion though...

other than that, great deck. :)

0
Posted 25 April 2012 at 23:55 as a comment on Knights attack!

Permalink

since you have black here you could add a few tutors to help with card advantage as well, to get the cards that you need sooner, in ddition to, or rather than the drawing. either way is good. :)

0
Posted 25 April 2012 at 23:47 as a comment on Time Warp/Panoptic Mirror Unlimited turns. Comments helpfull!!!

Permalink

Thanks. I like your as well. Love vault skirge, and the death cultist. I really liked that card, but never really could find a great use for it until I saw it here. :) well done.

0
Posted 25 April 2012 at 23:42 in reply to #250077 on 250th Deck

Permalink

well put. :)

1
Posted 25 April 2012 at 23:39 in reply to #250129 on Turn One Loss, So Simple!

Permalink

When saw exquisite blood, I went nutso over this combo in my head.

like it. have as imilar deck setup here:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=327020

1
Posted 25 April 2012 at 21:48 as a comment on 250th Deck

Permalink

who put salt in your sugar bowl?
Why do you think that just because he buit a different deck than normal, (I.E. a deck that intends to make it's player lose) that it can't be fun? I mean come on, wouldn't it be funny to see your oponents face when you bust out a turn 1 loss on purpose? (casual play, of coure.) if you want to see that he is serious about having a good game, and deck, then lookat the sorin deck2 slots down on the front page.

1
Posted 25 April 2012 at 21:25 in reply to #250055 on Turn One Loss, So Simple!

Permalink

3,301-3,320 of 3,481 items