No prob. :)
Permalink
I would say no, because the dingus egg targets the lands controller, which would be you. So, it would hurt you, and not your opponent.
Inexorable tide is the name of that enchantment. But the question is what would you take out for it, and the mutagenic growth?
I think that I will probably end up running 3 of each.
hm... From what I undertand, 75-ish isn't to bad for mill. But, if you want to thin down to closer to 60... I would say to take out wall of tangelcord, seeing as how you can't pay the G to give it reach. the erasure since you are only running a single of it, (or boost it and take out something else), the phantasmal bear and kraken hatchling, and move MOSTt everything that you are running 3 of to only 2. and you should only need about 20-24 lands. I find that to be what most people run. If you have any more than that you tend to get flooded a lot.
mucho nice. :)
I like, though it could use some life gain of some kind. perhaps a demon's horn or something. Also, iIt is a fairly large deck though, and perhaps you might want to trim it down to streamline it a little bit. I think that doing those 2 thing would be great. :)
That may be true. :(
The unblockables are a way good idea, and i will certainly look into that. As for the phyresis... It is a way good card, but I don't think that it would fit this deck, because it doesn't cause life loss. Thanks for the comments.. :)
urza'a rage would fit in very well here. :) and perhaps some of the new cards from avacyn. :)
I really like the fallen angel, but I think that it would slow down what the deck is designed to do. I will certainly take it into consideration if I need more oomph. :) Thanks for the suggestion. :)
cool. Thanks for the input. :) I would never have thought to put pillory in here. :)
Like. :) I have always wanted to build a good creatureless deck. Just never sure how to go about doing it. Love the concept.
could put in a master of etherium a well. :) I think that it might be better than the broodstar.
huh. Good Idea. Didn't even think of that. :)
plus, if you can keep him out, use his -6, to take all creatures, then use sundail of the inf. to keep them all.
hey, Ravenwolfheart, can you look at this and see if I am missing something on it? It isn't my deck, but the builder is either nutso, or goofing around just to annoy people (mainly me), or both. http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=327712
unless of course you are playing in casual.
I think that Tibalt is going to become a pretty frequently seen card in the near future.
Do you actually have this deck? It really is a cool concept.
3,261-3,280 of 3,481 items