Kazzong

401 Decks, 3,490 Comments, 885 Reputation

No prob. :)

1
Posted 29 April 2012 at 04:05 as a comment on Cremation??

Permalink

I would say no, because the dingus egg targets the lands controller, which would be you. So, it would hurt you, and not your opponent.

1
Posted 28 April 2012 at 18:20 as a comment on Cremation??

Permalink

Inexorable tide is the name of that enchantment. But the question is what would you take out for it, and the mutagenic growth?

0
Posted 28 April 2012 at 18:07 as a comment on Fast Infect

Permalink

I think that I will probably end up running 3 of each.

0
Posted 28 April 2012 at 17:57 as a comment on Life=Death

Permalink

hm... From what I undertand, 75-ish isn't to bad for mill.

But, if you want to thin down to closer to 60... I would say to take out wall of tangelcord, seeing as how you can't pay the G to give it reach.
the erasure since you are only running a single of it, (or boost it and take out something else), the phantasmal bear and kraken hatchling,
and move MOSTt everything that you are running 3 of to only 2.

and you should only need about 20-24 lands. I find that to be what most people run. If you have any more than that you tend to get flooded a lot.

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 23:20 as a comment on master Mill (THINNED)

Permalink

mucho nice. :)

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 23:12 as a comment on Fast Infect

Permalink

I like, though it could use some life gain of some kind. perhaps a demon's horn or something.
Also, iIt is a fairly large deck though, and perhaps you might want to trim it down to streamline it a little bit. I think that doing those 2 thing would be great. :)

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 21:14 as a comment on Zombie Hell

Permalink

That may be true. :(

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 16:02 in reply to #250550 on Life=Death

Permalink

The unblockables are a way good idea, and i will certainly look into that.
As for the phyresis... It is a way good card, but I don't think that it would fit this deck, because it doesn't cause life loss. Thanks for the comments.. :)

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 03:22 as a comment on Life=Death

Permalink

urza'a rage would fit in very well here. :) and perhaps some of the new cards from avacyn. :)

1
Posted 27 April 2012 at 01:14 as a comment on Cremation??

Permalink

I really like the fallen angel, but I think that it would slow down what the deck is designed to do. I will certainly take it into consideration if I need more oomph. :)
Thanks for the suggestion. :)

0
Posted 27 April 2012 at 00:32 in reply to #250448 on Life=Death

Permalink

cool. Thanks for the input. :) I would never have thought to put pillory in here. :)

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 23:34 in reply to #250421 on Life=Death

Permalink

Like. :) I have always wanted to build a good creatureless deck. Just never sure how to go about doing it. Love the concept.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 20:17 as a comment on Creatures are for sissies

Permalink

could put in a master of etherium a well. :) I think that it might be better than the broodstar.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 20:12 as a comment on Thopter KILL

Permalink

huh. Good Idea. Didn't even think of that. :)

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 20:07 in reply to #250396 on Time Warp/Panoptic Mirror Unlimited turns. Comments helpfull!!!

Permalink

plus, if you can keep him out, use his -6, to take all creatures, then use sundail of the inf. to keep them all.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 19:52 as a comment on (Standard)Idle Hands -> Devil's Playground

Permalink

hey, Ravenwolfheart, can you look at this and see if I am missing something on it?
It isn't my deck, but the builder is either nutso, or goofing around just to annoy people (mainly me), or both.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=327712

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 19:46 as a comment on Time Warp/Panoptic Mirror Unlimited turns. Comments helpfull!!!

Permalink

unless of course you are playing in casual.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 18:42 in reply to #250278 on Time Warp/Panoptic Mirror Unlimited turns. Comments helpfull!!!

Permalink

I think that Tibalt is going to become a pretty frequently seen card in the near future.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 18:39 as a comment on (Standard)Idle Hands -> Devil's Playground

Permalink

Do you actually have this deck? It really is a cool concept.

0
Posted 26 April 2012 at 16:22 as a comment on fun random combo

Permalink

3,261-3,280 of 3,481 items