TheSwarmer

Hmm, well as far as those matchups are concerned there are a few factors to mention:
1. Is it? I mean, is the meta grindy? The goldfish doesn't really say so and I am planning this for IRL play with my meta being a lot more creature focused with fish, eldrazi tron, coco, infect and such.

2. The deck packs a lot of value cards and 2for1s which should make up for battling more grindy decks, although beating walkers shall forever remain a nightmare, for this reason it would be wise to go 3-4 Urborg and 4 Mutavault.

3. I suppose I shall adjust the sideboard to that, thank you for the input, although different cards would be ones I'd play to make up for these matchups, simply drawing isn't that good, especially for this deck, I'd rather just play more necrogen mists.

thank you very much, it is one of my way older casual-budget and often themed decks. Now that I look at it, memnite has no place in the deck, any ideas for replacements?

Well, shit happens, though it is usually caused by something like the new Rolling Thunder being uncommon and people not being familiar, here they are visibly common.

What? It is a common as far as I know, always has been, always will be

That curve though xD
I'd honestly play 18 lands at most with that... curve

Yep, my exact thoughts, if the rock is to be the build it would want scoozes, goyfs, maelstrom pulse. And not just 8 cards, as good as they may be.
Especially when Twilight Mire makes running Phyrexian Obliterator easy

lupine prototype

http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/pauper-acid-trip/
Not saying it;s better, just something to look into

Hell, he might. I'd concede to that

http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budget-boros-land-destruction/
I still just might build it some day, such a shame... such a shame...

I know the change was triggered by the new aftermath cards, but that's why I said the change was done poorly.
They could have made the rule apply just to the aftermath cards.
Or make a different rule just for the aftermath cards.
Or make it so that the cards have 2 CMCs
But not just flip us all off like this...

Gosh I wasn't the brightest back then xD

I hate it too, the cards were by no means broken or too popular, they made for chaep-ish decks that had some sick synergies and were quite fun to play. I abhor this change personally, it makes no sense.
And there were better ways to go about it too :(

I was literally days from building boros land destruction with boo // bust dwellers. LITERALLY DAYS.
Dodged that one, but I still hate this change

I think playing a card that is, in this deck, objectively worse AND is as simple as the gate seeing as how it gains life where as the gate has an additional land type, is simply wrong. They both do something else besides being shitty duals. Saying that a gate is more simplistic than gaining life is quite the stretch. Not that both aren't bottom-of-the-barrel-simple cards.

Why not dismal backwater? why the guildgate?

Wait, what? Why make it legacy legal? Why include hymn and therapy? And why only 3 death clouds? I=And since it is not budget why no liliana of the veil? I am very confused xD

I knew they could flash back the fuse cards. Knowing this I think I am building mono red control very soon...
thanks for the inspiration!

After probe got banned my dreams of building a titi delver deck in modern with disrupting shoal were shattered.
Lets just say that Quickling+Spellstutter Sprite are more than welcome to replace that dream...

Can GDD cast bust and gone? If so then I know what I'm building next...