TheSwarmer

686 Decks, 1,283 Comments, 425 Reputation

All the tokens and blisterpods are worthless, I feel like that just kills the deck, otherwise and army of 3/2s could be really good.

1
Posted 26 August 2016 at 19:06 in reply to #588578 on Budget Decks: Eldritch Hunger

Permalink

{T}, Sacrifice Emrakul's Evangel and any number of other non-Eldrazi creatures: Put a 3/2 colorless Eldrazi Horror creature token onto the battlefield for each creature sacrificed this way.
NON ELDRAZI

1
Posted 26 August 2016 at 09:37 in reply to #588578 on Budget Decks: Eldritch Hunger

Permalink

Go ahead! Please I'll gladly see what you come up with! As far as the price goes It's a deck I already own but in proxies and I intend to build it when modern gets a bit more popular at my local game store. But I won't spend more than 250 bucks that's for sure

0
Posted 25 August 2016 at 07:20 in reply to #588561 on Budgetish Modern B/G Loam Pox

Permalink

I can totally dig this, this sorin seems like a god-send to the deck, not sure why people don't try it more often.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:28 as a comment on Martyr Life

Permalink

The one thing I don't like about the deck is the curve, you start super early with such aggressive creatures, then stop at 3 and resume at 6, not sure how much of an effect it actually has on the games as you run so few late game cards but still.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:27 as a comment on R/G Aggro

Permalink

You end up ignoring through a lot then don't you? :D

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:25 in reply to #588537 on R/G Aggro

Permalink

How well have you read Emrakul's Evangel? Or am I the one who's missing something?
Also, a playset of Stitcher's Graft?
I do like the deck, it's just that it seems half-baked, no cutthroat even!

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:18 as a comment on Budget Decks: Eldritch Hunger

Permalink

Yeah no, this is just amazing! I love the deck beyond reason. It seems fairly inconsistent but all the gy/pox/self-discard decks

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:11 as a comment on Inquiry [Modern]

Permalink

Fair enough, but why then does it say modern in the name? If the description said that's the case I'd have no problem with it but this confused me a heck of a lot :D

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:05 in reply to #588542 on ArroganceSword W Aggro Modern

Permalink

I see, I think the 64 card thing you've got going on is something you should put in the description of your decks, otherwise people might think you're just dumb and not comment. I for one did not notice that there are 64 cards, not here anyway. But I like that, I like that you're doing all that.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 18:03 in reply to #588543 on DescentPyromancer U/R controlM

Permalink

Thanks for the feedback, the deck is not consistent enough that is true but there is unfortunately no way around that.
I don't want to go into black, at least not yet. The color does offer A LOT to the deck but I believe that if I go black the deck just becomes a worse version of rakdos pox or vengevie.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 17:59 in reply to #588558 on Budget Modern Squees Zombies

Permalink

Firstly thnx for actually checking out all those decks! That's amazing!
The deck is just answers and lands that win the game and Syphon Life. I does work pretty well but my meta is not big enough to let me know whether it's really good for a 200 dollar deck.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 17:54 in reply to #588561 on Budgetish Modern B/G Loam Pox

Permalink

I'm not quite getting the deck, is this for casual or modern? Becasue the build seems really nice and original but ponder and brainstorm are not legal in modern.

Also, if you're gonna run brainstorm you might want to run more fetch lands

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 08:27 as a comment on DescentPyromancer U/R controlM

Permalink

Stoneforge and Jitte are banned in modern...

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 08:24 as a comment on ArroganceSword W Aggro Modern

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budget-modern-squees-zombies/
http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budgetish-golgari-vinemid/
http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budgetish-modern-bg-loam-pox/
http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budget-modern-rage-extractor/
http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/budget-modern-izzet-artifact/
http://www.mtgvault.com/theswarmer/decks/pauper-sultai-harvest/
These are some of my most interesting creations, I'd be glad if you checked some out.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 08:20 in reply to #587589 on Dumb Thumb [Modern]

Permalink

First of all I gotta say I love your deck names, they're amazing :D

As for this deck, I love the mono red approach, I think it's extremly interesting and well executed. I just can't get over the fact that you're not running 4x Incorrigible Youths, they are soooo good!
Also Stensia Masquerade is amazing vs other creature decks.

0
Posted 24 August 2016 at 08:18 as a comment on BloodFlow AggroMads Standard R

Permalink

Why not focus the deck on reanimation then? It seems REALLY scattershot, these decks usually set the goal of reanimating a big dude and winning with him yours is just overpriced slow stuff. And why 75 cards?

Try going down to 60 cards and going for speed.
Get cards that force you or both you and your opponent to discard
CHEAP reanimation like exhume
And CHEAP removal that ensures you survive.

0
Posted 22 August 2016 at 11:26 as a comment on back from the grave.

Permalink

While I love the idea, the lack of card draw and the fact that the regural scapeshift decks are probably always better make this just seem bad. I'd go all in on the combo so counterspells and coantrips in and non-como cards out.

0
Posted 22 August 2016 at 08:59 as a comment on Splendid Scapeshift

Permalink

SAME! Exactly the same. Wait why are there mountains? xD A mistake I assume.

0
Posted 21 August 2016 at 16:49 in reply to #588295 on Teferi Stax EDH

Permalink

With affinity and Zooicide existing I don't think this has a chance. They are both more consistent just as fast.
But I do like your deck, it's much akin to what I've been dreaming up quite some time ago. But I think it falls short when it comes to consistency.

0
Posted 21 August 2016 at 16:36 in reply to #588277 on Smoked

Permalink

561-580 of 1,283 items