surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

They're currently working on a system so that everyone can do it as the please. Those of use that you see with them were just lucky enough to have them done for us by the admins...but then it became too big of a hassle for them to do that so they redirected their attention towards a program for everyone to do it themselves =]

Oh, and if you have a question, in the future go to the Vault Forums, which can be found on the left hand side (labeled "Forums"), or you can just follow this link--> http://forums.mtgvault.com/

Hope that helps =]

0
Posted 18 December 2011 at 01:45 as a comment on HOW DO YOU CHANGE YOUR PROFILE PICTURE ON MTG VAUL

Permalink

Hehehe, thanks. It's not the best deck in the world, but I've always enjoyed using it =]

I suppose I should update it though...I sold my Mind Twists to a buddy =P

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 23:56 in reply to #222328 on Look Ma! No hand!

Permalink

I totally agree. I wouldn't even want to be able to do that kind of thing...I'm quite happy as just a mod =]

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 20:48 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

I have...boxes...devoted to individual colors like red, white, 'gold', etc. In other words...A LOT =]

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 09:56 in reply to #222329 on Stupid good Bant deck

Permalink

You could slap in some Creeping Tar Pits...People will hate you for it, but that's how Chisel prison decks work =P

1
Posted 17 December 2011 at 07:01 as a comment on Lock

Permalink

<_<

God damn it has been so long since I've seen the Pact version...I completely forgot about it.

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 06:54 in reply to #222070 on The next stage

Permalink

Heh, sorry about that =P

And honestly, my last post was just letting him know...I can't delete people's decks. I'm a mod, not an admin. It's a common misconception or something =/

1
Posted 17 December 2011 at 06:49 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

I don't delete your decks. The admins do.

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 01:26 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

If it was like that, then I'd be interested in it too =P

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 10:28 in reply to #222069 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

Not really...Unless you find one-sided fights the likes of an infant taking on a T-Rex interesting =P

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 08:33 in reply to #222069 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

Knock yourself out. I'm sure you're a huge contributor to those "other forums", much like you are here. It's interesting you only now seem to remember it is your 'girlfriend's account'. You'd think you'd have mentioned that in this post:

"It truly is amazing how stupid you are. I only posted 1 account on this trash deck. That account happens to be JimmyRep. Get over yourself..."

Oh, and different e-mail addresses don't technically count as "friends". Keep smiling buddy =]

2
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:53 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Odious Trow? Wut?

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:45 as a comment on The next stage

Permalink

These things really are glass cannons to the point of almost being "glass warheads"...I love tearing these inside-out, but I also just like to play against them. This is one of the rare types of combo decks that I actually have fun playing against =]

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:43 as a comment on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

<_<

Wow dude...I just got hit with 10,000 lbs of "Humble"

You just now reminded me that Sol Sim is a freakin golem...and that is amazing =]

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:36 as a comment on Henry Ford of.....Golems?

Permalink

If you're looking into doing a U/B "Millstraction" (A very budget-friendly type) then I'd suggest Circu, Dimir Lobotomist and/or Mind Funeral =]

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:30 as a comment on New Extraction - U/B

Permalink

As it stands now it's a pretty nice budget take on Extraction. Mostly I think some card ratios could be fuddled around with (yes, fuddled), but that comes out of playing the deck in a solid form.

You are correct that a big part of the two or three thousand dollar price-tag on a "high-end" Iso-Seek or PAL design is the lands, but not all of it. So like I said, it's nice to see what you can do with just 10% of that budget =]

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:27 in reply to #221577 on Extraction

Permalink

I actually make a lot of money off of having a job. Give it a try sometime =]

3
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:20 in reply to #221811 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

I originally had things in here like Voidslime, but decided this is more of an aggro design overall...with a bit of trollolololol tricks built in =]

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 23:36 in reply to #221927 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

It's truly amazing how angry you are. Also, I can guess without even looking that the account in question was made on July 10th, the same date as many of your others, has no decks, and a high post-delete ratio. How gullible do you think we are? Why do you think your decks keep getting taken off the top after you cheat them up? It's obvious to everyone dude, and your over-the-top angry posts, while hilarious, are doing nothing but showing everyone just how childish you are.

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 23:35 in reply to #221831 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Eeeeeesh...Alrighty let me work on some low budget stuff...Extraction is sadly a pretty pricey deck-type =[

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 10:48 in reply to #221577 on Extraction

Permalink

1,721-1,740 of 4,539 items