RoughneckBarbarian

1,202 Decks, 1,210 Comments, 22 Reputation

Once again, standard and cheap are not my strong points. Sorry man.

Although, I do have a new infinite deck for you.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=35952

0
Posted 06 December 2009 at 16:06 as a comment on My friend's standard deck (HELP)!!!!

Permalink

I don't see the point of Lich's Mirror, but Oblivion Ring and Kaervek's Spite would work much better.

0
Posted 06 December 2009 at 14:33 as a comment on The Cheese Looks Into a Mirror

Permalink

Not bad. You should look into Mycoloth, and replace Fists of Ironwood with Verdant Embrace. I'd also look into getting Doubling Season if you have the cash.

(Also, not to be a dick, but the plural of 'fungus' is 'fungi.')

0
Posted 06 December 2009 at 14:23 as a comment on saprolings and fungi

Permalink

I'm not too familiar with this area of play in the Magic universe. I'm pretty much a straight forward player (a barbarian of sorts). But what I CAN say is that you need to trim out the cards that you just don't need. I know you have a lot of searching ability, but what good does it do if you have to search for half of your cards to ever see them?

0
Posted 06 December 2009 at 14:19 as a comment on Sphinx invasion!(please comment on this deck)

Permalink

Tight. I'll work it in eventually. I have plenty of other decks I'm going to put it in first (such as my dredge/knight/reanimation deck with Haakon).

0
Posted 06 December 2009 at 14:14 as a comment on Soulshift

Permalink

4 coat af arms is a bit overpowered, isn't it? Why not replace 2 with Akroma's memorial to make your rats harder to block?

0
Posted 05 December 2009 at 22:15 as a comment on Relentless Rats

Permalink

So you're going to block with...?

0
Posted 05 December 2009 at 04:50 as a comment on Hazy Doll

Permalink

Omfg. Have 40 cards in the library? Draw 40 cards, deal 40 damage, play 20 spells, and put 20 cards back on your library. Draw 20 cards, deal 20 damage, play 10 spells and put 10 cards in your library. See a pattern? I just killed 3 people. Infinite enough for me. If you're going to argue semantics, make sure you don't do it arbitrarily.

PS - in that same amount of time (1 turn) I just set up two more INFINITE combos. Suck it.

0
Posted 05 December 2009 at 04:49 as a comment on R/U Infinity

Permalink

Oh, I'm not saying anything bad about the new cards. They rock. I'm just sick of "Jund this" and "Esper that." Call me an old codger...

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 18:03 as a comment on Before Jund, Esper, Bant, Gixis, and Naya...

Permalink

I like it! Have you looked into Soulcatcher/Soulcatcher's Aerie? Nice and cheap (2 drop) and pump up pretty quick. Kangee might also help. Of course, they really only work well with Pride of the Clouds.

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 16:59 as a comment on My casual deck(W/U tokens)

Permalink

May I suggest Scapeshift just in case something goes wrong?

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 16:54 as a comment on land wins

Permalink

So where does the infinite come in?

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 16:51 as a comment on Arties Combo

Permalink

You're welcome. ;)

Dude, forget Searing Wind. Keep with the infinite feel and use Savage Beating with Spellbinder. I'd also replace Vitalizing Wind with Decree of Savagery (yummy).

You might also want to replace your shooters (?) with unblockable or hard-to-blockables. Butcher Orgg, Lone-Wolf/Rhox-like dodgers, and Whispersilk Cloak would all be nice.

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 15:49 as a comment on Spellbinder wind death deck thing...yep

Permalink

Alright. I'm going to get to work creating the ultimate combo deck. 300 cards will be EASY to amass.

I also have a Battle of Wits deck, dknight.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=27680

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 14:07 as a comment on (insert title here)

Permalink

I know, but we all stopped playing Magic in the middle of Kamigawa and just started up again at the beginning of this year. I never had a red/blue deck, and the few that I have now have little if any cross color synergy. Basically, I just need good filler in between the cards stated in the summary because, as we all know, 4 different cards won't make a deck run.

0
Posted 04 December 2009 at 13:46 as a comment on Izzet a Dragon? (Ultimate Izzet deck - need help)

Permalink

Dude... Curiosity only costs one. Screw Ophidian Eye.

0
Posted 03 December 2009 at 21:16 as a comment on Izzet a Dragon? (Ultimate Izzet deck - need help)

Permalink

I was hoping to offset the high costs with Dream Halls.

Do you have any suggestions as to what spells might work best and what to take out? I would prefer to keep asmany cards multicolored as possible.

0
Posted 03 December 2009 at 20:19 as a comment on Izzet a Dragon? (Ultimate Izzet deck - need help)

Permalink

I have Mishra in any artifact deck I can put him in. There really is no reason NOT to if you have him.

Forbidden Orchard is there because if my opponent either doesn't play his creatures or doesn't have any creatures in his deck, he'll have something to kill himself with.

0
Posted 02 December 2009 at 22:53 as a comment on Stuffy and Junk

Permalink

Yup. It's REALLY dirty in multiplayer. Kill one opponent by drawing, play half the cards in your hand with Dream Halls, then tap Niv-Miz and kill another opponent by drawing, play half the cards in your hand again, then attack with a third opponent with a Spellbound Dragon (and most likely overrunning him for the kill), and kill another opponent with the drawing that results.

0
Posted 02 December 2009 at 22:43 as a comment on Izzet a Dragon?

Permalink

Hipponox, you should know by now that I'm going to look at every deck you make. Is it bad that I can tell which ones they are just by the titles?

0
Posted 02 December 2009 at 22:39 as a comment on Stuffy and Junk

Permalink

581-600 of 1,188 items