surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

Hahaha! It's been a long time since I've seen a "Kokusho Nuke" as my buddies and I call it. =]

This one might be even better than my friends...I might have to show this one to him. Well done Ded. =]

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 22:43 as a comment on Storming Dragons

Permalink

This deck still lets your opponent *PLAY* against you. They'll be overwhelmed and probably lose and be frustrated, but they still will have played against you.

An evil deck will make the opponent feel as though they never got to actually play their deck. I've heard my deck "Pure Evil", for example, described as "watching me play Solitaire".

1
Posted 14 December 2010 at 22:40 in reply to #105512 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Wonderful. See, once you make one Stompy and --really-- get it, it becomes much easier to do. =]

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 22:30 as a comment on Mono Green Stomps You

Permalink

65 cards?

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 22:27 as a comment on Stomp

Permalink

Seriously?! EDH is one area where I'm admittedly a bit of a novice at. So because it sorta has an illegal color in it, I can't use it? That blows =/

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 22:19 in reply to #105655 on Uril EDH

Permalink

But Harrow is much more Stompy than Cultivate =]

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 14:05 in reply to #105632 on Mono Green Stomp

Permalink

I'll be damned. I wasn't expecting to actually see a Stompy when I clicked on this...well done dude! =]

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 14:04 as a comment on Mono Green Stomp

Permalink

They'd get all dirty and full of grime. =]

-1
Posted 14 December 2010 at 12:44 in reply to #105593 on The Dirty Deck

Permalink

Hey I found it. Again, this is a really flavorful deck. It's a shame you don't have any Birds, but otherwise this looks like it's fast enough for being a for-fun deck. As to any suggestions...The only one I can see is that Hostility doesn't really do anything in the deck =/

0
Posted 14 December 2010 at 00:18 as a comment on Elemental Incarnation

Permalink

Thanks. Glad you get the reference. =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 22:41 as a comment on Stomp on Eden

Permalink

****ing tempo deck. God damn...

I like it...it just brings back bad memories...

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 22:15 as a comment on Faeries

Permalink

By the way, care to take a look at my most recent (and probably last for a while) Stompy deck?

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=124886

=]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 21:07 as a comment on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

lol no, but it does qualify as damn good. =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 21:06 in reply to #105512 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

Well i sorta took your advice. I took out the Liege of the Tangle(s) and put in Coat of Arms to make each one of those Sand creatures frickin' huge! =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 20:56 as a comment on Dr. Octogonopus!

Permalink

Ah crap...Sorry whoever I bumped off...

<_<

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 20:51 as a comment on 3 Stomps, you're DEAD!

Permalink

Oh hey, since you have the right colors, I think you should find a space for one of the all-time meanest cards of all time: Circu, Dimir Lobotomist

Perhaps take out 2 Vendettas? =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 20:17 as a comment on Extraction

Permalink

Yeah, it's always funny when you get out enough things that hurt them when they draw and have out forced fruition =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 18:02 in reply to #105479 on Choke

Permalink

Hey not bad. I think you could do with only 20 forests, but otherwise this is pretty nice. Oh, and I'd take out the Beast Attacks for some kind of pump like Primal Bellow. And yeah, Plummet is a Sideboard-only kinda card, maybe take it out for more pumps as well.

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 17:51 as a comment on WHAT A LOAD OF BALOTH'S

Permalink

Hey man. This deck isn't half bad. It does need some work though. The biggest issue is that it's 70 cards instead of 60. That makes a HUGE difference.

The second issue is that you have a number of "singles", or, only one of something. That's alright for a first deck and for a newer player, and it's something I see all the time. Now the good thing is that these two issues could help fix each-other.

If you try to remove most of your single cards and only keep what you REALLY need (I'd say all but Nissa and Ezuri), then you should lower the deck's size pretty well.

Another thing I'd take out is Bloodscent...you don't really need it in here.

With those changes, you should be down to 60 cards and this first deck of yours will be much improved. =]

Hope I helped =]

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 17:45 as a comment on Elvish Tokens

Permalink

Bloodghast is the vampire pinnacle of aggression. You just swing away with them. Who cares if they die? Or if they're tapped? The fact that next to nothing freakin' gets rid of them makes them an absolute nightmare for the opponent. Also, once they gain their haste boost, reaching an even greater level of aggression, a land played will likely result in the death of your opponent.

1
Posted 13 December 2010 at 17:30 in reply to #105458 on Vampire Blitzkreig

Permalink

4,041-4,060 of 4,539 items