surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

Well honestly as good BSA is, I think you could do much better with at least one more sword. I would maybe run with a sword of body and mind or a sword of feast and famine. I think feast and famine might be the better of those two. After that I might run a single Elbrus, but that one is your call.

0
Posted 13 May 2012 at 21:36 in reply to #254713 on Daisycutter

Permalink

I also have a (recently) standard Taps deck that might also help. I'll leave the link below.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=212542

0
Posted 12 May 2012 at 21:11 in reply to #253619 on The Idea

Permalink

I really can't at the moment dude. Over the next 4 weeks I am going to be insanely busy, sorry, but it is what it is =/

All I can really offer at the moment is to direct you to my Taps deck "I'd Tap That" (first page methinks in my decklist) and also the comments within it. I know a few people have looked at it and especially the comments within and it has helped them with their Taps (I'm assuming what you've built is a Taps).

0
Posted 12 May 2012 at 21:07 in reply to #253619 on The Idea

Permalink

Never said Extraction was a cheap deck type =]

0
Posted 12 May 2012 at 05:58 in reply to #255053 on "I am become Death"

Permalink

By the way, if you happen to drop a poem in this thing I may just add it to the description =]

0
Posted 11 May 2012 at 03:28 in reply to #253619 on The Idea

Permalink

Call me crazy but I think you could do a hell of a lot better with something else instead of baneslayer. I also think that hyena umbra could easily be replaced by some better tech/more tech. Otherwise it looks like a nice G/W toolboxy kind of deck.

As for a name for your deck, "Daisycutter" comes to mind.

0
Posted 11 May 2012 at 03:00 as a comment on Daisycutter

Permalink

It is good, but I don't think it's as good as people think, or at least it isn't good for the reasons people might think. I do wonder how legacy RDW will evolve from this dude as he can greatly extend a decks damage threshold. The nice thing about thunderous wrath is that if I don't get it for that dirty miracle cost I has, I can ditch it to looting

0
Posted 11 May 2012 at 02:52 in reply to #254679 on Something like that...

Permalink

What the hell kind of breasts have you seen that look like that?!

1
Posted 10 May 2012 at 21:23 in reply to #254301 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Dark ritual to thoughtseize and extirpate. Trolololololol.

All joking aside I love these decks. There's always someone at every card store who has seething similar, and it's always fun to play them

1
Posted 10 May 2012 at 05:24 as a comment on I don't even know...

Permalink

I'll be flat out honest with you. I didn't look at the deck itself yet, but am commenting and liking it simply on the basis that the story you put into the description is freakin awesome =]

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 05:19 as a comment on Inn of the Night's Thirst

Permalink

Well actually Bloodghast can't block (probably because it would be unfair with its ability). It's mostly in here to die over and over haha. This deck has so many things that kill my stuff that Bloodghast will be in an almost constant state of death. Then once it gets its haste active, I can go hog-wild =P

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 05:08 in reply to #254059 on The Idea

Permalink

This is pretty good actually. As an extractor I can't help but mention that you need to be sure this thing can do fine with the combo crippled. In addition I have to let you know that Emmy ranks among the top ten highest sources of mana burden in this game (progenitus is the worst) so if you can't comfortably get him on the field, then screw it, don't kill yourself trying to make it work

Hope that helps=]

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 04:50 as a comment on EMRAKUL EXPLORER RAMP *<*

Permalink

Trollololololol

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 04:28 in reply to #253532 on Something like that...

Permalink

I dunno if I have any room for that card in here, but in all honesty it wouldn't be too bad

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 04:26 in reply to #252066 on Something like that...

Permalink

I've been told this was one of the first things that the admins made a point to add into v3 of the vault. So soon young padawan

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 03:59 in reply to #254303 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Alright well Kulrath is crazy in here. With Choking Fumes and that guy in play it's such trolololol move

0
Posted 10 May 2012 at 03:39 in reply to #253230 on Let it Bleed

Permalink

I'm surprised it took this long for someone to put grisly in a deck. This looks solid man, and if this is what can be done with modern...I can't wait to see what legacy reanimator does

0
Posted 09 May 2012 at 21:42 as a comment on [Modern] Gifts rock

Permalink

I explained above why I dont like Craterhoof, but it comes down to it being overkill and unappealing to a guy who loves flavor as much as I do.

I could have sworn I squeezed Sorin in here...ffffuuuuuu that's gonna be a headache to fit in here =/

As for Martyr's Bond...it's certainly something I'll look into, but with all the other stuff I'm trying to cram in here (I swear this deck feels like 300 cards sometimes) it might not fit =/

0
Posted 09 May 2012 at 18:45 in reply to #254133 on Fungus in Nobis

Permalink

My typical opponents run EDH decks of similar caliber, so not quite =P

0
Posted 09 May 2012 at 08:06 in reply to #254097 on Fungus in Nobis

Permalink

Doran is actually pretty nice in here since a majority of the "asymmetrical" creatures are "bottom heavy", if that makes sense. Cathar's Crusade would indeed be absurd in...at least three of my EDH decks =P That card's a bit absurd.

With this deck already stuffed to the brim, I just don't have room for something like Bone Splinters. EDH banks on getting the most use out of each card since you only have 1 of anything. Bone Splinters will kill off one dude, and that's it...The sac won't matter, that's true, but still, I'd want something that can "recycle" better.

Craterhoof has crossed my mind, but there's two reason's I probably won't use it. 1) It's complete overkill in this deck. Yes, it's funny to kill someone with 100 tokens all with +100/+100, but it's not necessary. and 2) The thing rubs me the wrong way...It doesn't fit in the otherwise enormous flavor of the Innistrad block. It looks like a giant green turd that somehow makes all your creatures bigger? EDH needs to have some flavor to it in my opinion. Playing a bland EDH deck is possibly one of the worst experiences you can have.

0
Posted 09 May 2012 at 02:09 in reply to #253511 on Fungus in Nobis

Permalink

1,341-1,360 of 4,539 items