WhiteAndBlueTheyKillYou

117 Decks, 1,801 Comments, 677 Reputation

IP Spoofing for the win! God I love that I run off of Backtrack...

0
Posted 18 December 2011 at 14:23 in reply to #222560 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Jimmy, I'm glad you and your group could have a laugh, amusement is the main goal of the game. Hope you keep finding the fun with what you do man, and nothing but best wishes for you.


@Sure; I think it'd actually be a bit silly if they let you delete decks while the site is still this size, but then again I don't pay much attention to the front page.

1
Posted 17 December 2011 at 12:44 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Yup, meaning you can crack a Lion's Eye Diamond in response to casting Infernal Tutor :D It's like playing a Black Lotus and a Demonic Tutor!

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 12:22 in reply to #222335 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

To be honest, it's about 80% you that's doing it for me Jimmy. It's not your decks, I haven't looked at them, but rather that you kind of are an ass. Sure has responded in a civil, albeit taunting manner on several occasions, but you generally come off as a troll.

And this is a tribal deck, for a house format that's aimed at trying to have as much fun as possible. For the tribe he picked this is about as good as it gets, so that's what I really don't understand is you complaining about them being 'trash'. If you want to see some trash that made it to the front page, look at some of my decks that have.


Again, all I ask is that we let the discussion about the two of you die, and you both go on your merry way. I wish the best for you Jimmy, and Sure has become one of my favourite people on this site, I wash my hands of this affair.

I'm going to stay on the site, but merely ignore things of this nature. This has gone far enough.

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 02:31 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

Alright, here's something I suggest the both of you try out; just ignore the living hell out of the other. The pair of you obviously can't get along, so way not just move on, and let the other do what they do.

I really like the site, and Sure has given me loads of help, but the two of you have been kind of killing this site for me.

0
Posted 17 December 2011 at 02:01 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

You're feeding trolls man, I'm not saying Jimmy is trolling, but that by responding in these ways you're painting a target on yourself for trolls who slip onto this site.

Again, I'm not sure if Jimmy did anything, I couldn't really care enough to look into it. I mean no offense to anybody, I'm just saying.

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 16:41 in reply to #222068 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

@_@ I shouldn't have opened that can of worms, I've been watching nothing but Ant and the Aardvark and stand up... I'm not sure if I love or hate my insomnia right now.

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 14:42 in reply to #222069 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

Whoops, thought this was the other one. Land Grant SI is slower, but plays through hate better, whereas with Pact SI I've boasted a higher turn one win percentage than dedicated Belcher decks.
What's great about it is that unless I used a pact when I shouldn't have, I can usually rebuild for a turn two kill against fish even :O

This one I'd say the extraction match would be more like this, just unattainable victory for the SI player.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qJ-ozgFKoo

1
Posted 16 December 2011 at 10:06 in reply to #222069 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

God... Extraction vs. SI must be one hell of an interesting match.

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 06:06 in reply to #222069 on Nobody remembered the Spanish Inquisition!

Permalink

Lol, I'm trying to piece back together the Pact version of Spanish Inquisition I ran for a while before really working out the kinks in Doomsday. It was a great card in the list because I could tutor for it, and it could be either A) a black source imprintable onto Chrome Mox, or B) Cheap ass Culling fodder.

This deck was a bit... Dodgy at best, but it's much more enjoyable than ANT or TES when it comes to just playing the deck.
Doomsday is my preference, but despite what a lot of people say I think it to be the hardest form of Storm to competently play in Legacy. Not that it's really difficult, it just requires you to be ready to do a bit more math than any of the others...

0
Posted 16 December 2011 at 05:54 in reply to #222070 on The next stage

Permalink

I'm just going to go out on a limb saying that this is pretty much a children's card game.... I'd even say that we're not so far from this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKDMTwpLFTI

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 07:48 in reply to #221831 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

I'm a little confused right now...
http://www.myfacewhen.com/i/501.jpg

0
Posted 11 December 2011 at 08:22 in reply to #220631 on Reanimator for Nats

Permalink

I just put the title together, me gusta!

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 08:02 as a comment on Me Dredgesta

Permalink

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa8xS_pn9F4
Best. Compliment. EVER. Seriously, I'm thinking about framing this.

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 08:01 in reply to #220522 on Perfect Crime

Permalink

Deputy Chief Judge Fish and Chief Judge cal are the law!

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 05:26 as a comment on I AM THE LAW!!!

Permalink

Usually I play a strange myriad of decks, but right now I think this is it for Legacy. And just keep the other lists ready in case I suspect a lot of people are going to use Extirpate :D

I hope you place well man, and you've come a long way in such a short time since you started the format.

0
Posted 10 December 2011 at 04:45 in reply to #220511 on Perfect Crime

Permalink

That, and the ever present threat of mana denial. Fish, Maverick, and most variants of Tempo run a full complement of Wasteland, and if for the blue portion of that list Stifle for our fetches :|

0
Posted 09 December 2011 at 23:41 in reply to #220359 on Reanimator for Nats

Permalink

Jin-Gitaxias provides us so much card advantage that it's just silly, whereas Sheoldred improves our already impressive field advantage. Jin-Gitaxias provides us a position of power against any deck, whereas Sheoldred just gives us a slight nudge when we're already over the edge.

TLDR; Jin-Gitaxias and Elesh Norn are more palatable choices for what a Reanimator needs.

0
Posted 09 December 2011 at 21:41 in reply to #220359 on Reanimator for Nats

Permalink

Man, I've modified my list to accommodate a pair of Flusterstorms, and dear God I've had nothing but brutal results so far.
I've only lost two mirror matches so far, and that's out of 23 matches
http://www.myfacewhen.com/329/

0
Posted 09 December 2011 at 05:10 as a comment on Reanimator for Nats

Permalink

I've got a friend who plays magic with both of his kids, and his wife. I've never seen his kids eyes light up as much as when they beat him in the game, it makes them proud, it makes them feel like they've done right by their father to be good enough in the game to do so.
I personally don't care about the front page, I've made it there and all it gave me was a string of people netdecking my stuff, and an unwarranted amount of hate on MWS. If you're doing this for your kid, I support it, if you're lying through your teeth I still couldn't mind.

0
Posted 07 December 2011 at 03:55 in reply to #219765 on (~)___(~)

Permalink

561-580 of 1,795 items