WhiteAndBlueTheyKillYou

117 Decks, 1,801 Comments, 677 Reputation

I was actually mine for a while(I'm working on some projects on screen two), so I actually didn't see it till after I posted :O

Dismember is one of the reasons the joke(Mold Adder) works so well, but really it's more because of NLT, I think Eric English is the name of the fellow who is bringing it to the public eye. It's a similar shell as the Canadiens deck I did, but without Hierarchs(something I admit was a mistake).

1
Posted 22 October 2011 at 07:40 in reply to #208857 on Now that you mention it

Permalink

Still looking at the numbers, it's still not as much that I'd be willing to pay life for it :/ However with Tarmogoyf... Things change fast.

1
Posted 22 October 2011 at 06:31 in reply to #208806 on Dr. Wumps, Stompy 1002 #2

Permalink

Not sue if Fry, or memebase fan... (V) (;,,;) (V)

But yeah, it was kind of an experiment along the same lines as the original Team America decks. It turned out decent enough, but I'm not personally sold on it.

0
Posted 22 October 2011 at 06:28 in reply to #208841 on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

I thought Mold Adder was just to hilarious to pass up, glad to see somebody caught that already :D

And I'm just as shocked as you are that I actually made one, it doesn't have a single blue spell!

0
Posted 22 October 2011 at 06:26 in reply to #208857 on Now that you mention it

Permalink

Actually the thinning of a playset of fetches is almost unnoticeable, mathematically it's so insignificant that it's only really useful to run fetches in mono-coloured decks if you have library manipulation such as Sylvan Library, Sensei's Divining Top, or Brainstorm.

1
Posted 22 October 2011 at 02:19 in reply to #208806 on Dr. Wumps, Stompy 1002 #2

Permalink

Couldn't Lead the Stampede be of a bit more use in a three slot than Finks? I mean I love that creature and all, but it just seems like a refueling could be a bit more useful.

Also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8N_tupPBtWQ :D

1
Posted 21 October 2011 at 21:57 as a comment on Manamanah

Permalink

I find myself having to concur on all fronts there DedWards, I continue to enjoy using my Doomsday decks against net deckers, and the aftermath is probably the best part.

"I need some excedrin..."
"But Stoneblade is tier 1!"
"Touche dickwad"
Ah the joyous sounds of my last three wins (V) (;,,;) (V)

0
Posted 21 October 2011 at 21:28 in reply to #208363 on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

Have you ever thought about writing a book on the subject Wumpus? Because I think you're qualified.

Also for a while I ran Soulgorger in a strange version of MBC, and it devastates if used properly.

4
Posted 21 October 2011 at 04:33 in reply to #208586 on Dr. Wumps, Stompy 1002 #2

Permalink

@_@ More comments than I expected on this deck.

Firstly I'm dealing with the topic of net decking, I find myself having to concur with you DedWards, as I've seen people lose exact mirror matches(with amazing hands) using my Reanimator builds. That's a pretty simple deck for me, and seeing people mess it up suggests to me that it's because I know each card and why it's there gives me an advantage.

Secondly the Zoidberg thing... I was watching the show when I made this deck, and couldn't for the life of me think of a name. Zoidberg said he might be of some assistance, and I took him up on that offer.

And as for the thought of running Traft in here, I'm planning on something else with him in it :D It isn't functional yet, but it should be soon.

1
Posted 20 October 2011 at 07:58 as a comment on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

I want you to look at the name of the deck bro, I'm pretty sure Cabbaj doesn't expect to bet TES or Dredge with this.

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 07:17 in reply to #208071 on The Most Absurd Deck Ever

Permalink

I've given people headaches explaining some of my decks, and once or twice a migraine from trying to teach how to run Doomsday Tendrils, but DEAR GOD.

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 06:49 in reply to #207679 on The Most Absurd Deck Ever

Permalink

It has its good points, but overall I'm dissatisfied with this design. Notably I detest SFM, but Excalibur Bant currently does better for me than even Zenith, and that makes me sad.

I'm glad you like it though, and if you have even an inkling desire to play it have at it. As much as I'm a player for MtG, I'm tenfold more a builder.

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 05:23 in reply to #207834 on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

I can dig it, this is the deck I based my first reanimator off of before the bubble burst :)

Something you should really think about is Jin-Gitaxias, most people run three copies nowadays, I myself run a two:one split with Iona, and Jin really wins a lot of matches.

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 03:21 in reply to #207972 on the lagacy reanimater

Permalink

This looks a lot like the deck Andreas Müller ran at the Grand Prix before they banned Mystical Tutor, ah how it makes me nostalgic of a better time for the deck. Back when it, TES, and ANT had been the decks to beat.

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 01:29 as a comment on the lagacy reanimater

Permalink

Okay, somebody has to ask; why are you running reassembling skeleton?

0
Posted 19 October 2011 at 00:32 as a comment on Schoolar Ooz

Permalink

It makes me incredibly sad that this actually costs MORE than Legacy Dredge.

0
Posted 18 October 2011 at 05:08 as a comment on UG Dredge

Permalink

Really? I've always heard that curve called SoulStomp, granted most stompy people I see are a bit out of the loop I think.

Also, I think you've had your PhD for a while now when it comes to stompy Wumpus. Since whenever you made your 10L, at least I would take it as a dissertation on the subject.

2
Posted 17 October 2011 at 06:19 in reply to #207569 on Dr. Wumps, Stompy 1002 #2

Permalink

Dag, I am disappoint. But I'll check it out in a second

0
Posted 17 October 2011 at 03:29 in reply to #207470 on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

I think there might be another one left, outside of the semi useless Shield Sphere, but I'm not sure.

0
Posted 16 October 2011 at 23:22 in reply to #207487 on Heartless Affinity

Permalink

I'm with you on SFM, it really is an obnoxious card that ruined a lot of the process of playing equipment decks :/ I run it in Bant nowadays because it makes a more consistent package than CounterTop, which while remaining to be one of my enjoyed tactics, is just not good enough yet.


I looked at the W/U/x builds of the Blade decks, and it's dishearteningly similar to standard. I'm more likely to run MUC than this, or simply laugh at it whilst playing MUD XD

0
Posted 16 October 2011 at 23:19 in reply to #207470 on Need a deck name? Perhaps Zoidberg could be of some assistance

Permalink

801-820 of 1,795 items