surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

Yeah I'll look at them =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 17:13 as a comment on Facesmasher

Permalink

Nope, it'd just be considered a really fast red deck, and probably end up Sligh.

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 17:11 in reply to #123450 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

Oh, and proliferate is still an awful and slow mechanic. It would just weaken a Stompy deck =/

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 16:19 as a comment on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

Plague Myr? You mean that whimpy over-priced Lanny wanna-be? No way man. Ichorclaw is a force to be feared.

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 16:18 in reply to #123487 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

I've never been a fan of having a lot of colorless-tapping lands. I tried adding more, since they are sweet, but it makes things all..."wonky". =/

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 16:15 in reply to #123485 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

After your friend gets 2nd place in state regional using a deck you designed...Yeah, people bug the **** out of you to build them decks. Trust me, it's not all chocolate and sprinkles....

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:54 in reply to #123460 on Facesmasher

Permalink

Well it IS about perfected mana efficiency, but it's also mono-green (since mono-green is the most mana efficient). =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:42 in reply to #123450 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

Might sideboard him for specific decks, but otherwise I gotta stick with Spellbreaker. =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:37 in reply to #123025 on A-Naya-lation

Permalink

Not huge enough though...

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:33 in reply to #123444 on Facesmasher

Permalink

Oh, and obviously these will be a bit similar. Good decks often look pretty similar. =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:31 as a comment on Facesmasher

Permalink

Yeah, he's great because he's another "battle cry'd" maniac flying in for the kill.

I've said it before that I wanted to sway away from building Tourney decks ever since I made that one back during Ravnica for my friend (you can't imagine how much you get bothered by people after something like that...I still get emails every once in a while).

That said, I've been considering going back into the swing of things with this. However, PLEASE don't ask me about the other top meta-decks that will arise. I will help with decks as always, but I'd like it if I wasn't building tourney decks again.

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:30 in reply to #123460 on Facesmasher

Permalink

I KNOW WOOO! =]

Oh, and the two new forests make a cool picture if you put them together (it's all infect-y). So I put in 5 of each. =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:22 in reply to #123458 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

like a ****ing freight-train! Infect is just so damn strong. Rot Wolf and/or Ichorclaw with Infiltration Lens is insane =P

Also, I play it with the looming threat of a blast of pumps if they let something through, so it really puts the opponent "in my court", so to speak. Phyrexian Hydra is a beautiful creature.

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:21 in reply to #123456 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

Only mono-green. However Naya might soon become the first non-mono-green Stompy. It isn't yet, but hopefully soon, since I think it could be considered Stompy in a lot of ways (Woolly Thoctar?!).

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 15:13 in reply to #123450 on Does this look Infected?

Permalink

Sure I can. =]

There's something called a probability curve, which ever deck has, that graphically displays the changing probabilities of drawing (or already having in hand) cards that match the changing (often increasing) mana available. The "sick voodoo" I try to do is to make the mana-curve match up with the probability curve as close as possible. The cool thing about this "magic number" is that it will always put a deck pretty damn close to matching, and all you have to do is follow the number's rules.

I have gotten closer to matching with some other decks of mine, such as Little Bastards, which I got to match the probability curve 88% which is sexy. Will I ever get to 100%? I doubt it...but it's always a hope. =]

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 12:07 as a comment on Numbered Goblins

Permalink

What? How'd this get up there? (not complaining, but still)

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 11:04 as a comment on The Wall

Permalink

That's not a glitch. That's supposed to happen. The idea was that a deck with a lot of conversation must have something worth noticing/talking about.

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 10:38 in reply to #123148 on A-Naya-lation

Permalink

Glitch? =/

0
Posted 01 February 2011 at 00:21 in reply to #123148 on A-Naya-lation

Permalink

Vengeshaman Naya isn't Stompy, you are right. But it really is an apples to oranges sort of thing. Besides, if I'm going to abuse the hell out of Vengeshaman, it's going to be Jund...and I did that =P

<_<

Don't judge me...(I have a problem)

0
Posted 31 January 2011 at 23:59 in reply to #123203 on A-Naya-lation

Permalink

Can't help but think of Pink Floyd =]

0
Posted 31 January 2011 at 23:26 as a comment on The Machine

Permalink

3,481-3,500 of 4,539 items