surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

ouch...now THAT'S a painful extraction...

seriously damn that's mean. =P

0
Posted 27 November 2010 at 00:15 in reply to #102171 on Sadistic Sacrament

Permalink

Unfortunately, if you're aim is to make an extraction deck, it's possible to do it in standard, but you have to do it differently than how you're doing it now. This deck has a nice mana curve, but lacks enough synergy to really make much use of that. 4 kicked sacraments will allow you to (literally) extract someone's entire deck, but how likely is that?

I suggest, if you really want to abuse the card Sadistic Sacrament, rework this deck to have more control and more ways to work as an extraction deck such as many discard-based cards and Haunting Echoes, among other things.

0
Posted 27 November 2010 at 00:14 as a comment on Sadistic Sacrament

Permalink

I'm pretty sure this deck has the highest percentage of cards with amazing art EVER! =]

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 23:10 as a comment on Shall we dance?

Permalink

congratz on top decks! =] (again)

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 23:05 as a comment on Elfdrazi Green

Permalink

I use an army of Bloodghasts >_>

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 19:55 in reply to #101993 on ITS SO ANNOYING!

Permalink

Haha...I don't know about that. I've always had fun with white =] I'm just glad it's even better now!

Hey do you think you could take a look at my "Dirty Deck"?

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 18:55 in reply to #101672 on Elfdrazi Green

Permalink

There =]

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 18:49 in reply to #101809 on The Dirty Deck

Permalink

haha you deserve it man. I've had too many of my decks on the upcoming list lately...8 last night. >_>

So I think it's good that other peoples' decks are getting on here too =]

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 16:59 in reply to #101953 on Land Destruction (Green)

Permalink

Well it get's really bad when I create multiple games WITHIN multiple games! Once it starts, you never go back to the original game. It is fun watching my opponents' sanity dwindle. They start getting irritable and slap-happy...quite amusing really.

1
Posted 26 November 2010 at 16:38 in reply to #101527 on Are we ****ing DONE?!

Permalink

Haha you love those trinket mages don't you? Jokes aside I considered them, but wanted to cram this full of as many pingers as I could, and after they grab the gear, which is sorta overkill anyway, they just sit there...

So in the spot where the used to be is 4 Curiosity(s). And those are way better, insta-kill combo or not.

1
Posted 26 November 2010 at 00:46 in reply to #101997 on Tim-TIMMAH!

Permalink

lol you can't control it, I just meant that your deck passed my Dirty Deck in likes, so it went lower on the upcoming list. I was joking. I should be the one apologizing to people about hording the upcoming list...

<_<

0
Posted 26 November 2010 at 00:32 in reply to #101953 on Land Destruction (Green)

Permalink

Red Deck Wins. It's a name for insanely aggressive and fast red decks. Named so because the first ones many years ago were almost completely unbeatable, though they have never been easy to beat, since they're so "in-your-face". This deck isn't actually a RDW, it's sort of a joke. If you want to see an actual RDW, then take a look at my deck "Ignition".

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=114678

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 19:24 as a comment on Smolder

Permalink

Why would I want to use those for this deck? I mean, yeah, they are good and that's a cool trick...but it just doesn't really make sense in this deck to me. That's also why I have just 20 lands. Well one reason is I've always preferred running lower on lands than other people think they should. The other reason though is that Gaea's Cradle supplies PLENTY of mana. =]

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 18:30 in reply to #101972 on Kicked in the FACE!

Permalink

L-ER GOY-F

(Lhur sounds like "Her" and Goy sounds like "Toy" then add an F at the end)

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 17:59 as a comment on How do you pronounce that?

Permalink

Well of course, it all comes down to preference and opinion. But TRUST ME on the Blade. That card is downright unfair when used in a fast vampire deck. Let's say you have it on your...Nighthawk. Your opponent attacks you with 3 2/2's and you block two of them with two of your lacerators and the 3rd with your nighthawk. All three of his 2/2's die and your lacerators die, which is 5 things hitting the 'yard. Your Nighthawk now has become a 12/13 flying, lifelink, deathtouch who gets EVEN stronger every time he kills something or one of your things dies or one of your opponent's things dies.

Honestly, I'd lose the Bites and put in 4 Blades. It really is THAT good. =]

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 16:43 in reply to #101707 on Skinny Vamps

Permalink

Anyone know of lands that are "dirtier" looking? There's no real reason for it other than y'know...this is all about "dirty". =]

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 16:22 as a comment on The Dirty Deck

Permalink

={ you bumped down my Dirty Deck....

Actually I don't mind. This deck is pretty funny man. I like it!

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 13:58 as a comment on Land Destruction (Green)

Permalink

Yeah, I'd lose the Disfigures for Fabricates. Then I'd take out 2 Tidehollow Strix and 2 Nemesis Mask for 2 Stuffy Dolls and 2 Pariah Shields. =]

1
Posted 25 November 2010 at 13:01 as a comment on Gimme a hug

Permalink

This deck doesn't have enough "layers" of protection as it stands to survive against an aggro deck. I suggest sideboarding some board wipes as well as maybe 1 or 2 Dragon Claws for RDW.

Also, with board wipes...that'll be a potentially large number of cards hitting the opponent's 'yard.

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 12:54 as a comment on bloodchief type 2 turn 4 win... dont rank down without comment

Permalink

I know. I grabbed a whole ton of them when I could, I had a feeling they'd go way up in price...I was right.

0
Posted 25 November 2010 at 12:46 in reply to #101672 on Elfdrazi Green

Permalink

4,241-4,260 of 4,539 items