surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

HAHA this is so funny. I really like this one, very original. My only suggestion is finding a place for Stuffy Doll. If a ton of dudes block him, well that's just hilarious. =]

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 13:40 as a comment on Gimme a hug

Permalink

Yeah, any fetchland will work to thin out a deck and thus accelerate it. I said Verdant because I like their art more than the misty rainforests =P

When you play a fetchland, you can immediately pay 1 life (no big deal) and sacrifice it to find one of the two lands it lets you find. So, you play one land out of your hand, and then pull another land out of your deck. Thus you have less lands in your deck, which "thins" it out (because it actually IS getting thinner). With this, you increase the chances of drawing cards that you need while still getting lands out on the field. In some cases, adding fetchlands can increase the speed of a deck SUBSTANTIALLY. If you notice, a number of my mono-colored decks still have fetchlands in them for a "speed boost". =]

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 13:34 in reply to #101672 on Elfdrazi Green

Permalink

Am I the only one who sees this deck's name and thinks of that insurance commercial? "We. Are. Farmers. Bum-buh-bum-bum-buh-bum!"

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 13:06 as a comment on We are Squirrels

Permalink

While I agree that Mind Funeral would fit well in here (actually in place of the Glimpses), this is what is called an "extraction" deck or sometimes also a "disabler" deck. The way decks of this kind win is by ripping the opponent's deck apart. By the end of it, the opponent has absolutely no win conditions left, and their library is incredibly thinned. Your opponent loses because they just can't DO anything, and you just keep picking them apart.

My own evil deck, "Pure Evil", is essentially an extraction deck that uses "Iso-Seek" to destroy their deck, among other things. These decks are quite fun, I highly recommend trying one out.

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 13:04 in reply to #101780 on Sadistic Annihilation

Permalink

Pretty good actually. Only thing I'd change is to replace the Child of Night(s) with Bloodghasts.

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 12:24 in reply to #101733 on Black Sacrifice

Permalink

Congratz to deathtyrant5000 for getting his evil deck on the front page before mine =P

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 12:21 as a comment on Are we ****ing DONE?!

Permalink

Oh how I love it when "that guy" enters the conversation with the age old tag line, "If you don't like it just quit!"

1
Posted 24 November 2010 at 12:18 in reply to #88618 on Please Read

Permalink

I'm telling you right now that when it comes to sacrifice decks, I've found that Bloodghast and Reassembling Skelly are two complete opposites. The Bloodghast is amazing for aggro-based sacrifice where as the Skelly is much better for control-based.

I would suggest losing the Skellys for Fume Spitter or Demonic Appetite. Also, you don't need 4 Buried Alives in here. You'll end up getting too many of them, and you really only need 1, the second being backup for later tricks in the game. I'd trade out 1 Grave Pact, 1 Quest for the Gravelord, and 2 Buried Alives for 4 Virulent Swipes. =]

0
Posted 24 November 2010 at 12:08 as a comment on Sacrafical Lamb

Permalink

Truth be told I don't own any Energy Chambers...But if I did, I probably would use them for a different deck to be quite honest. I see many an evil thing I could do with those >:}

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 23:36 in reply to #101668 on Colorless deck challenge

Permalink

Swap out the Disfigures for 4 Urge to Feeds and the Vampire's Bites for 4 Blade of the Blodchief(s) and this deck will be amazing.

24-10-4 is another mathematical "super-sequence" much like my favorite sequence for making Stompy decks, 24-4-8-4 is. If you make these changes, you'll be VERY happy with the speed and power of your deck.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 23:27 as a comment on Skinny Vamps

Permalink

Eh, Stalling leads to card drawing by its very nature =]

If I added additional means of card drawing I'd simply over-draw, and nobody wants that =P

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 23:22 in reply to #101674 on Are we ****ing DONE?!

Permalink

*sigh*

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 23:12 as a comment on Its a MYRacle!!!

Permalink

If I had a penny for every time someone incorrectly labeled their deck "Stompy"...

This is a nice deck, but it's a nice AGGRO deck, not stompy. >_<

Sorry, it's just a MAJOR peeve of mine. This is in all seriousness a nice deck.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 23:10 as a comment on Oh, you came so close! >:)

Permalink

If I were you I'd swap out the Tectonic Edge(s) and put in 4 Verdant Catacombs. Deck thinning and such is almost always a better choice than the occasional funny land destruction.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:56 as a comment on Elfdrazi Green

Permalink

Hey this is pretty cool. I have a deck that uses Elves and Wolves in harmony with each other, but this deck pushes it much more towards JUST wolves, and that's pretty cool.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:49 as a comment on the famous 2/2 wolfs!

Permalink

Take out 2 plains and 2 swamps for 4 Marsh Flats and this thing is pretty nice.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:34 as a comment on Tapped

Permalink

You only have red for 4 creatures, all of which cost 1 red. I would suggest dropping down to 3-4 mountains, maybe even 2 and adding in Arid Mesas if you can get your hands on them.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:31 as a comment on Quick Equipment Deck

Permalink

Eh, it doesn't need them. Yeah, sure It That Betrays is quite evil, but there's always a menacing feeling that a creatureless deck holds. Adding in a creature just makes it...nicer. And who'd want that? >=}

1
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:29 in reply to #101428 on Sadistic Annihilation

Permalink

I have 6 mana drains >_> I promised myself and my friends I'd never use them again though...They're freakin' absurdly unfair.

This is a pretty sweet deck, and unfortunately a little bit late for my "Yoink!" deck challenge. This one would probably take the cake. (Get it? TAKE! ....Sorry)

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:20 as a comment on Unnatural Selection

Permalink

I'd love to, but just like DoDG, for whatever reason adding "Free for sacrificing three black creatures" big guys absolutely FUBAR's the deck's math. I have no idea why it does this, but those guys seriously make the math of this deck cry.

0
Posted 23 November 2010 at 17:12 in reply to #101645 on Black Sacrifice

Permalink

4,281-4,300 of 4,539 items