surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

It's still there, but I highly doubt he's still doing it. They said that instead of wasting the time getting flooded with requests (which they really were), they would spend that time making improvements to the site...including a future option to upload a pic.

Still, I don't think it's on the top priority list...mostly because almost nobody is asking for it

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 03:38 in reply to #212096 on Extraction?

Permalink

Gush, Clamp, Misstep...those three are really the only ones I think they messed up =/

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 03:19 in reply to #212167 on [Vintage] Doomsday

Permalink

Alright fixed it up. I gotta say, the fact that you were able to pilot this shows me your skill. This is NOT an easy deck to play =P

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 03:04 in reply to #212151 on "I am become Death"

Permalink

Also Crucible greatly allows STAX to work without limits. And Crucible with Bloodghast works very nicely =]

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 02:53 in reply to #212116 on Look up here

Permalink

Haha, I knew you'd like it =]

One problem is I need to update this list because Misstep is still in it =/

0
Posted 05 November 2011 at 01:04 in reply to #212151 on "I am become Death"

Permalink

Because Legacy Doomsday wasn't douchey enough?

1
Posted 05 November 2011 at 00:57 as a comment on [Vintage] Doomsday

Permalink

Haunting Echoes is a terrible Extraction card. Plain and simple. It's only seen in Millstraction, which is such a "lesser" form of Extraction that it is largely just considered "mill with tricks", or it was seen in Standard periodically, simply because of Standard's suffocating card-base =/

You shouldn't be insulted by being called a Standard player...it is obvious that you are, but that doesn't mean you are a bad player by any means, it just means you are less informed about cards such as Bitter Ordeal. If you are wondering, http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=208040 <--- That, is how it is better.

Entire decks are designed around Doomsday, just so you know =]

1
Posted 04 November 2011 at 22:54 in reply to #212063 on Extraction?

Permalink

I think it's because Dark Confidant looks a lot like a young Bob Dole...

1
Posted 04 November 2011 at 22:43 in reply to #211174 on Extraction?

Permalink

That's what I was talking about before...I guess I should elaborate when I notice things =P

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 22:40 in reply to #212077 on O'er Hell and Hide

Permalink

Oh yeah, the older BUG design had a few flaws and was a bit unfocused. The new version is tenfold better =]

I know how you feel...I still keep fiddling with minute things to see if they'll improve on a deck...probably why I always have so many headaches =[

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 03:57 in reply to #211649 on Look up here

Permalink

I can imagine Sacrament becoming drastically better in this environment...glad to see I was right. I'm surprised to see you don't have Yawg main deck. I think in this design, it would bring about the insane shenanigans that Yawg is infamous for =]

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 23:56 in reply to #211886 on O'er Hell and Hide

Permalink

<_<

Vintage Iso-Seek? I'm definitely interested in how this works for you.

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 23:13 as a comment on O'er Hell and Hide

Permalink

Really? Oh I love PAL...It's actually very focused IMHO. Which design of it have you played? Because in just the last few MONTHS it has changed drastically.

And I have to say, even though it's a strange hybrid, it looks like one of those rare hybrids that actually works well =]

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 22:57 in reply to #211649 on Look up here

Permalink

Eh, it's a win-win either way really.

What surprises me is you still run this like a Poxtraction/Iso-Seek hybrid...No Bitter Ordeal...But maybe that's for the better, because going full-tilt in the direction of Poxtraction will lead you to PAL...which is a whole different beast...and one HELL of a deck to pilot (hilarious to see net-decks of it murder themselves...) =P

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 19:43 in reply to #211649 on Look up here

Permalink

Yeah sorry about that...I tend to type up whatever happens to be churning through my head, so if I fail to elaborate that's my bad =]

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 17:33 in reply to #210902 on umbrella corp. 2.1.0

Permalink

Ah, yeah a Misdirection would do it =P

I think 2 ghasts would give you a bit more consistency...

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 17:26 in reply to #211649 on Look up here

Permalink

I know. What I was saying is that telling people that the end-all, be-all is to have multiples in the deck leads to these very rigid decks with 10 playsets (as much "multiple" as possible) and then 20 lands. My comment had little to do with the number of lands, but more about how misguiding newer players goes both ways.

You make a good point. And to quote my shop owner, "If you're not having fun, then what the F**k are you doing?"

1
Posted 03 November 2011 at 15:26 in reply to #211767 on People building their first decks!

Permalink

I already draw like mad in this deck =P

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 05:42 in reply to #211677 on Sic Semper Tyrannis

Permalink

Hehehe, I love that video =P

I've recently started to not use Panoptic Mirror in my builds...I may suggest you try it out as well. I can actually see the use of Entomb, and with the newly available spots you could add in a single (or 2) Bloodghast for Smokestack + U.P. schenanigans =P

One last thing, why Silence over Chant?

0
Posted 03 November 2011 at 04:45 as a comment on Look up here

Permalink

The simple answer is, it doesn't let that happen...

But, IF a Goyf managed to get into play, then usually some SB action might be taken...otherwise Obliterator would be quite capable of dealing with it =]

1
Posted 03 November 2011 at 04:19 in reply to #211593 on [Vintage] MBC

Permalink

1,901-1,920 of 4,539 items