wickeddarkman

112 Decks, 4,559 Comments, 801 Reputation

Could the mana be reworked to contain valakut, the molten pinnacle?

1
Posted 18 October 2019 at 14:14 as a comment on Shifting Deads

Permalink

They took his penis, but it was worth it

0
Posted 18 October 2019 at 13:29 in reply to #627833 on Unbeatable Combo

Permalink

Heh, embarrassed much!
I hadn't made it public...
Very forgetness, flushy face Is flushing!

5
Posted 17 October 2019 at 22:10 in reply to #627180 on Be More Supportive

Permalink

I've suggested that a guideline was built for newbies to decrease people from producing too many decks, and that people upvote and comment before posting a deck so they don't bury their own work. It's in my most recent post. I've given actual solutions to gary and the community there.

If my version doesn't make headlines, go ahead and hijack the parts, you agree would be useful, as long as it spreads things could improve. Awareness of the disease is always the first step

4
Posted 17 October 2019 at 20:29 in reply to #627180 on Be More Supportive

Permalink

So the conversation broke down! Did gary break it? Did we break gary? Did we think everything would be magically fixed by him and just relaxed, taking a mental break?

It cannot just end like that, so re-read your last conversation and reignite your thoughts on this post

Gary may or may not fix this, but we have to plan for failure, as if he never visited us.

This falls on everybody...

4
Posted 17 October 2019 at 11:35 in reply to #627180 on Be More Supportive

Permalink

Brilliant, simply brilliant

0
Posted 16 October 2019 at 22:35 as a comment on Exalted Winning

Permalink

Here's a quick analysis of your current swarm of projects.
They gain less points.
You have three pages of decks, and looking at the oldest you gained a lot more points back then.
Your decks had long unique names, but once we take a look at the new decks you have, they are much simpler in name and gets less points.
The strange thing is that I personally like the new way you do it, but for some reason your older upvoters don't

I've noticed this because I've had a decrease in upvotes as well and is trying to pinpoint what's different from my past moves.

Maybe you can give a hint back to me. It's often harder to see what is in front of you.

As an experiment I upvoted one of you older decks and commented on it, the exalted winnings. Keep track of it to see if it gets more points. I upvoted it to 6 points.

0
Posted 16 October 2019 at 22:33 as a comment on Prime Speaker

Permalink

You can proxy cards and playtest against proxy decks.
It's the cheapest way to get competitive but takes some good friends or lots of spare time.

1
Posted 16 October 2019 at 22:07 as a comment on Mono-Blue Mill/Control

Permalink

Isn't eh a format where most people have costly cards in their deck?

I've played mill with phenax, god of deception and mindshrieker together, and the bird can get seriously large

I can also tell you that mesmeric orb is a card you really want in this deck, as it's capacity for milling usually surpasses that of glimpse, and I know that from plenty of modern tournaments with my own mill

0
Posted 12 October 2019 at 23:56 as a comment on Phenax, God of Deception EDH

Permalink

Not a bad idea.
Concordant crossroad might also be something, and has a shared past with intruder alarm. Another option might be living end or similar revival of past petitioners. The major key to unlocking the decks potential seems to me to include haste.

Mass hysteria might be an easy pick, and if you go with the concept of using the graveyard somehow there is anger.

A total spinoff may be that green card that allows you to target a creature in play which allows you to search for all copies of that card in your deck and play them for free. Anyone knows the name of it?

1
Posted 12 October 2019 at 15:09 in reply to #627710 on Pauper Mill

Permalink

I'm asperger's so that will be both.
If you don't know what aspergers are, just think of that angry climate girl , she's asperger too.

And just to avoid mistakes, it's the esper 93/94 that was built by paper strips and evolution. I suggest cards for the process, but it decides what's kept or cut from the deck, so the deck is actually built by evolution. I used to use computer simulations, but then I had a bright idea.

0
Posted 12 October 2019 at 06:43 in reply to #627661 on Pauper Mill

Permalink

Okay, you start out with 60 sleeves and 60 land in them, then you RIP or cut pages of paper until you have 60 paper strips.

That will be your statistical engine.

You will also need a deck that is the best in the meta to kill and/or counter creatures.
That will your testdeck.

Now start to play games, preferably with a friend playing with the testdeck.

Each time you want to use a land just put a sign for land on a strip (an l can do it) only play lands when it is necessary.

Each time you want to play a strip as if it was a petitioner write a p on the strip
.

When you no longer need to play lands write an e on a strip marked as a land. E stands for excessive.

When you win with the petitioners all the strips that are petitioners that was excessive in play or in the hand must be marked with an e.

Once a card has a total of 5 positive Mark's than there's e-marks on them take the strip out and write what card it has finally become, then reinsert it and continue thr tests until all strips have a fate.

During all of this the process will work out the perfect number of lands petitioners and excessive cards.

Then you got all the excessive cards to fill out as you please.

The process will take about 6 hours.


I use a more advanced of this process to build my decks for me. Go take a look at my 93/94 core 2 to get an idea of how powerful this is as a tool.

2
Posted 12 October 2019 at 05:35 in reply to #627661 on Pauper Mill

Permalink

It's also pretty fun we use any decks we want and then take turns on being the bad guy.

0
Posted 11 October 2019 at 05:19 in reply to #627675 on Fucking Griffins!

Permalink

Yeah, that's the name.
Back when it was released I foresaw that it would eventually end up in a serious combo deck, so I bought all of them that I could get my greedy hands upon.

I got more of those than I got storm crows.

0
Posted 11 October 2019 at 04:36 in reply to #627664 on Infinite Token/ Life

Permalink

Much mill, I like,
but...
I prefer my mill to have at least 8 mill cards :p

0
Posted 10 October 2019 at 19:19 in reply to #627667 on Infinite Token/ Life

Permalink

Sounds fun I played a setup where the bad guy would play a normal deck but would take as many turns as the number of players trying to beat him. And had 20 life for each opponent
Players started first.

0
Posted 10 October 2019 at 18:43 in reply to #627675 on Fucking Griffins!

Permalink

You had 1 job...

Decks with a command zone usually only have 1 of each card
, and a total of 100.

0
Posted 10 October 2019 at 16:26 as a comment on Fucking Griffins!

Permalink

So we're reduced to upvoting memes...

I'm in...

Much lol, such deck, no doge no wins.

This deck needs a dodge.

Wild mongrel because playing with a doge is never an option when you encounter it.

9
Posted 10 October 2019 at 05:00 as a comment on Unbeatable Combo

Permalink

Much cards,

So luxurious.

1
Posted 10 October 2019 at 04:43 as a comment on Gonti, Lord of Luxury

Permalink

Interesting idea, I used a similar deck in modern once.
I used mindshrieker for mill and as a super beater while having kira great glassblower to protect it.

How about flickerwisp ?

0
Posted 10 October 2019 at 04:39 as a comment on Processor Mid/Control

Permalink

3,061-3,080 of 4,558 items