wickeddarkman

By the way, you can like your own posts once, I've seen a few of your posts having 0 likes, so I know you haven't upvoted yourself :D

Veiu:
Make some links on your premodern deckpages to my archive:
https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/premodern-format/
Remember it takes work on the net to make a network :D

Alternatively write a little about the format and the tags, and copypaste it to each deck so people can start finding the format in here. There's a lot of oldies who don't know the name of their favorite era :D

Impressive number of pre-modern decks you've stashed since last time I looked.
If at each post you copypaste a link to my "collection" or some other players there is a better chance of people seeing all of the work combined. All networks need networking :D
https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/premodern-format/

Alternatively write a little about the format and the tags, and copypaste it to each deck so people can start finding the format in here. There's a lot of oldies who don't know the name of their favorite era :D

KOALA's go away!!!
Stop eating this man so I can talk to him...

Here's my "premodern" soltari

https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/premodern-format/

Hey old man :D
There's an upcomming trend to call decks oldschool when they have cards from unlimited to fallen empires.
If a deck have cards between ice age and scourge it's now "premodern"

If you have any premodern designs, just tag them with "premodern" and I will then link you in this link:
https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/premodern-format/

Hey there, I can see you have a couple of decks marked as "oldschool".

Recently there has been a lot of "reformating" and oldschool has come to cover the meta from unlimited to fallen empires, while the meta from iceage up to scourge have become premodern.

If you update your tags I can link you within my "site"
https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/premodern-format/

Looking at this list I remember how much I hated it back then :D
Have you exchanged werebear with merfolk looter? I think werebear was part of the design, but it's been a while since I've faced it.

Memory serves me well, and there are some changelings out there that really wants to be a part of this deck.
One of them may be mothdust changeling because it's a flier enabling a few early attacks even though it doesnt contribute to the hive, and the other, mirror entity is really bringing it to the table...

Nice detail with the lands :D

That rules refference could be interpretted as if frogtosser lowered the ordinary castingcost while you still payed the full prowl. (This could be relevant with chalice of the void in play)

So I dug some deeper and found out that you are absolutely right.
All alternate costs can be reduced as if they were the original cost.
That's a thing I didn't know about :D

If he has enough 1cc's that damages the opponent he can just pay the prowl-cost.
Frogtosser doesn't lower the prowl but rather the ordinary mana. Prowling Cards cost half the ordinary mana while frogtosser lowers 1 mana each, so it takes 2 frogtossers to simulate a prowl of noggin whack and three of them to simulate a prowled knowledge exploitation.

Frogtossers dosn't forward the goal as well as small hitters does :D
In the case he meets a deck with pyroclasm, which kills his small critters, frogtossers won't help either, so the main strategic goal is just to stay with prowling out of it.

Only against a deck with ensnaring bridge or something like it, it will pay of to play with frogtossers.

It's been 7 years since you made your own version so my best guess is that there wasn't many rogues around, so frogtosser really just filled a slot for you. Your own deck even plays with lower castingcosts so your own design holds no justification for playing with frogtossers :D (maybe they were played best after you've been hit by a sweep?)

Since everything but the combo is "fill" you should use more of your fill to protect the combo or enable it.
inquisition of kozilek, thoughtseize, pact of negation. Viscera seer + memnites.

Mill is played by 1% of the meta at the moment which is a huge deal.
Hexproof has been a 1% deck for years, and is now at much more.

I worked out 6 generations of my own mill before I discovered a way to make the paperstrips better,
now I'm playing against the last 2 testdecks to create a "new" generation 1, which has extreme win% compared to my generation 6. (I think it's around 20% better on an average) The worst winrate so far is 30%

I will singlehandedly make mill mainstream...

Being a mill player I can't help looking at those 7 lands and think, "Damn they'll be gone soon".
If you started, you'd open by searching for lands at your turn 1, running into archive trap there.
The opponent will then play surgical extraction at their turn and rid you of charbelcher.

I've been playing a lot of games against valakut where the key was to mill them with archive traps and glimpse the unthinkable and closing the game with surgical.

Currently mill is a fringe-deck, but it has gained the attention of more and more this year, while wotc has had a history of always adding 2-3 millcards to the game. (they done this since the lorwyn cycle) So logically mill is an increasing threat future to you.

If that ever happens, your best bet is to sleeve up 3 leyline of sanctity for the sideboard ;D

I've toyed with phenax-mill lately and at a time I went into collected Company.
It didn't Work for my design, but you got plenty of creatures for it.

Maybe seal is an adaption against chalice 1. The deck has 16 1cc's after all :D

Not the archetype :D
The monogreen variant in specific!
I think I saw something like it 2-3 years ago, but was wondering about the historics of it.

How old is the decktype ???

Slither blade!
Nice follow up :D