ManiacalManiac

46 Decks, 1,316 Comments, 395 Reputation

In response to Muktol, thanks for the suggestions I've replaced Cultivate with Evolution Charm and trying to figure out how to fit Rancor in.

1
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:42 in reply to #498262 on Infectious Pauper

Permalink

That's what I'm going up against whom my friend plays. 1 of the decks anyway.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:35 in reply to #498262 on Infectious Pauper

Permalink

Well I play vintage casual with my circle of friends mainly and go to modern nights now and then at local shops. I can say that in a casual setting what I described gives my friends the feeling of "Really your playing that". LOL In response I simply say "yep it will be over soon and I imagine your gonna reach for Eldrazi ramp next match" which they and kick my ass. By the way your version isn't good for a modern event but loads of fun to play. Have fun with it.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:32 in reply to #498255 on vampire fenzy

Permalink

I'm pretty new to pauper and this is what a friend in my circle said we should follow so this is what I follow. I'm not 100% what the exact rulings are for deck construction if this is not it.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:26 in reply to #498262 on Infectious Pauper

Permalink


Pauper Deck Construction
The letter P!auper is a Magic Online format in which all cards used must have been printed at the common rarity in a Magic Online set or product. Common promo cards are only legal if the card has been printed at the common rarity in a set or product. Other than that, the usual rules for Constructed decks apply (a minimum deck size of 60 cards in the main deck, an optional 15-card sideboard, and so on). If a common version of a particular card was ever released on Magic Online, any versions of that card printed at other rarities are also legal in this format.

Example: Counterspell was a common card in the Seventh Edition core set, which was released on Magic Online. Counterspell was reprinted in Masters Edition II with an uncommon expansion symbol. Both versions of the card can be used in the Pauper format.

Example: Hymn to Tourach, another uncommon from Masters Edition II, is not legal for use in the Magic Online Pauper format. Even though Hymn to Tourach was printed as a common in the Fallen Empires set, that set was never released on Magic Online

The Pauper banned list is:

Cloudpost
Cranial Plating
Empty the Warrens
Frantic Search
Grapeshot
Invigorate
Temporal Fissure

http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/tcg/resources.aspx?x=magic/rules/pauper

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:15 in reply to #498262 on Infectious Pauper

Permalink

Nice! Glad I was of some help in round about way. I will say that if you play this at your local and dominate anybody I wouldn't be surprised if a few people had an Elixer of Immortality the following week. If so then Leyline of the Void would be a good answer to that.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 17:14 in reply to #498235 on Dimir Mill(modern)

Permalink

To that I will reply with the deck stands to be finished without needing anything which is what I started this conversation saying. LOL Now I'm curious why you marked it unloved when I thought that was what we're suppose to do when needing help. Either +1 from me.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 16:57 in reply to #498235 on Dimir Mill(modern)

Permalink

Curious if you want this to stay modern ? If not, think of turn 1 swamp to Dark Ritual into Buried Alive for 3 Bloodghasts. Turn 2 swamp Bad Moon. Turn 3 swing for 9 or 12 with a second Bad Moon. I use this in my Vampire deck and it's pretty relentless.

2
Posted 27 August 2014 at 16:50 as a comment on vampire fenzy

Permalink

I tend to be blunt myself, No worries man.
Leyline of the Void could be used for the same purpose providing more versatility now that I think of it. Like against certain other decks which abuse the Graveyard.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 16:26 in reply to #498235 on Dimir Mill(modern)

Permalink

I was thinking against Elixir of Immortality, and I know most don't which is why I worded it that way. Simply discussing a possibility since this was your Unloved marked deck. I really don't think it needs much at all. I was intrigued to see your decks by our convo from the discard deck we were tweaking earlier.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 16:10 in reply to #498235 on Dimir Mill(modern)

Permalink

I don't think this needs much but maybe Duskmantle Guildmage for a alternate win con if playing against someone that actually sideboards against mill.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 15:52 as a comment on Dimir Mill(modern)

Permalink

I'm not gonna disagree with any of that, you are right Sir.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 15:00 in reply to #498141 on Black - Token Overwhelm

Permalink

I agree that it is situational and have actually had an argument about it not being good in a deck on here for that matter.(LOL) However if it's "situation" didn't occur during play with this deck something went horribly wrong and I would be extremely surprised .
As well I will add that there isn't a single deck to my knowledge which plays black that wouldn't benefit from the mighty queen of Darkness Liliana of the Veil!

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 14:47 in reply to #498141 on Black - Token Overwhelm

Permalink

I agree completely. Yet I still think Endless Ranks of the Dead needs a spot maybe put Ritual of the Returned to a 2 of.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 14:33 in reply to #498141 on Black - Token Overwhelm

Permalink

Very true! How the hell did I forget about Inquisition when it's what I use. LOL

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 14:23 in reply to #498141 on Black - Token Overwhelm

Permalink

Very true but a possible turn 2 win for $12 in pauper is still nothing to shrug at. :)
( For a brief second I didn't have Mutagenic Growth. LOL

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 13:41 in reply to #498194 on Infectious Pauper

Permalink

Pretty sure this deck is why the player's created Waste Not. :) maybe instead of Bitterblossom? (Not implying Bitterblossom isn't amazing just that Waste Not may be better suited hear.)

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 13:17 as a comment on Modern 8Rack.

Permalink

A few of my friends are starting to build a few pauper decks for kicks. This is one I'm gonna put together today.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 13:02 as a comment on Infectious Pauper

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/maniacalmaniac/decks/6-challenge-infect/
This would be my attempt. I think it still counts being $6.01 and it's actually pretty effective.

0
Posted 27 August 2014 at 03:18 as a comment on Budget Decks: 6$ Challenge

Permalink

I like the idea but I think this is just way to slow for comp modern. Quag Sickness should be replaced with Hero's Downfall. Deathcloud is horrible dealing that much to yourself it should be replaced with Thoughtsieze. Mind Sludge is fun for a 1 of but the other three will be better as Duress. Nykthos shrine works better as a 2 of since drawing multiple legendary lands sucks, more swamps would be better or a few Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth. And Squelching Leeches isn't really doing anything to do with discarding or zombies and isn't really that strong, maybe consider Endless Ranks of the Dead instead or Phyrexian Obliterator for a crazy 4 drop creature if you want a good creature.

If I come off a bit harsh I apologize it's simply my opinion and should be taken as such.

1
Posted 27 August 2014 at 02:35 as a comment on Black - Token Overwhelm

Permalink

1,061-1,080 of 1,252 items