fluffstar

31 Decks, 649 Comments, 43 Reputation

agreed ref the champion like i speculated his cost is better and a cheap human even late on is a good move with the angelic overseer's early game hed be very powerfull - thanks.

0
Posted 21 January 2012 at 02:00 in reply to #229034 on ANGELS GOT HUMANS BACKS

Permalink

hi thanks i dont want the deck to be reliant upon decking itself to win, the other day i played without once getting the mirror mad or the maniac out and one by looting and alchemying enough cards into g/y for the cage breakers to take it and tbf with the mirror-mad adding silly amounts of creatures its my usual win condition i beleive decking myself all the time is to risky after all a timley spell upon te maniac and ive lost, i agree garuck would do well in here as he lets me put creatures into the graveyard fetches my mirror mads out into hand which tbf i use the alchemys the looters and the fauna shaman to do this so when i sac another mirror-mad theres less in deck to draw !, i agree his final ability in here is insane so hes an option tbf upping the fauna shaman count would do all but the final ability an dkeep my creature numers as high as possible, i miss counter spells in here i do but wanted to keep my creature count as high as possible and i cant always control what i mill so id rater pack it with creatures as at least they serve me well in the g/y as well as hand milling counter spells would jus be a dead loss, i would ove to have them to hand tough so i agree in principle with there inclusion.

0
Posted 21 January 2012 at 01:55 in reply to #229027 on MIRROR-MAD BREAKERS

Permalink

mmm yes i completly understand the use of the metaphores once you have a demon out and i see that casting one lets you fetch another or a metaphore another in the deck would just mean you draw one more often i'd defo consider a 4th even if you keep the metaphore and the sword, like i say top deck either way,
p.s ive been busy responding to your comments on my decks cheers.

3
Posted 21 January 2012 at 01:10 in reply to #229004 on Heartless Blade

Permalink

hi thanks for the comments left on my heartless summonig deck, i have made some adjustments mainly reference the card draw please check it out again and also my other latest decks particualy the snapcaster mage and the mirror-mad deck, then that woud be appreciated.
i really like that this deck provides you with all the early control and then with your zeniths you can wipe the board and trigger multiple affects i mean perilous myrs and the Simulacrum, you have x4 heartless summoning so id look to get a little more use out of them in terms of the reduction in mana cost and look to add another couple of big creatures you also have x 3 metmorphs to clone stuff id drop 1 metemorph and the sword (nice as it is) for 2 bigger badder creatures maybe a 4th rune-scarred and something like a titan or a abyssal persecutor (your zeniths would remove him) just my thoughts good deck, hope you find time to check out my other decks and any you need an opinion on ask ?
cheers.

3
Posted 19 January 2012 at 23:15 as a comment on Heartless Blade

Permalink

i posted these today please take a look.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=280591

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=280595

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=280601

thanks.

0
Posted 09 January 2012 at 14:12 as a comment on MIRROR-MAD BREAKERS

Permalink

thanks i am tempted by the black but i am worried that i may struggle to cast te black if i happen to mill the multi lands forbiden alchemy is just 1b cc so can get away with that not that i flash it back that often, i just didnt want to many things relying on a 3rd colour although tbf spider spawning is also only 1b i beleive, i dont mind em knowing what i'm up to with the mirror mad as if i have 2 land 3 i can sac it in response to them trying to kill the mirror-mad phantom, i dont have that much else in here to self mill so carrying 3 phantoms meand i'm more likley to draw one, i do like the fauna shaman cause once i have one mirror-mad doing its thing the shaman lets me fetch the others into my hand so i dont hit them when i mill, so prehaps taking on board your point more of them would give me the greater milling your talking about.i find the cage breacker brings an average of 6-8 token with it but have done it for 18 late game after extensive milling this is down to high creature numbers hence why i dont want to cut down on the amount of mirror mads or other by adding doubling season, looters fauna shaman and forbiden alchemy can dump the mirror-mads into the g/y to avoid drawing it from my library.
i'll give spider spawing more thought and an extra fauna shaman to thin the deck of mirror mads as i agree with your point about that, thanks a lot,

0
Posted 09 January 2012 at 14:09 in reply to #226942 on MIRROR-MAD BREAKERS

Permalink

love it !, presumably you use your cheap spells early doors then when your g/y is full you past in flames then choose in order the mana ramp cards the gobbo tokens then grenade them for lots finished by a brimstone volly with morbid ! ?, very nice pif can be expensive though and the deck looks so fast early on i imagine after 1st few goes say after g3 your waiting till go 7 to kick off the past in flames and are vulberable why you wait ? i may be wrong ?, iron myr adds a little ramp to help out i can see that aand i guess the wellspring not sure you need the shrine though maybe artilirise to sac the well springs ?

0
Posted 09 January 2012 at 13:52 as a comment on past in flames alternative

Permalink

good use of heartless summoning these creatures always had the potential to be great but just fell short - untill now !

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 01:32 as a comment on Heartless Infection

Permalink

hi, good deck lots of touch;s all nice, kessigs, dread return etc. i'm trying to build a regular 60 card deck based around kessigs and mirror-mads so more focused but with less options than this deck, im really struggling with no removal or control of opponents creatures please take a look.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=258098
thanks. and good deck

0
Posted 15 December 2011 at 01:01 as a comment on Innistrad 100-Card Graveyard

Permalink

i think for x 4 snapcasters you woud benifit from a lot more utility cards !

0
Posted 13 November 2011 at 00:31 as a comment on snapcaster UW insane control

Permalink

just adding you and this deck to my comments list so i can revisit tomorrow well ater today but not at this ungodly hour anyway deck looks intresting, we need a catch up old freind speak later.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 04:52 as a comment on Aggro Solar Flare

Permalink

i find full moons rise pretty usless really in my play testing sure its great in combat ut a 1 off regenerate against all the removal just dosnt add up for me werewolfs only work with a fast kill often down to luck of the draw and with a moonmist in hand need to play 8 of them lol any advise ?

feel free to check te deck its called werewolfs prey upon you, these are the issues i am having

i do see the sence of full moons rise in this deck with the blasphemous acts - nice touch !

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 02:26 as a comment on Werewolves Done Right

Permalink

ok i consider this one of my top 2 decks i ran it in a tournement recently and it failed down to a lack of removal i always thought it had plenty but maybe not i switched out the colourless indestructable lands as most things need several black so even casting my lich is go 2 if i wanted to drop the indestructable land for the counter i can still cast it go 1 with a vault and a ritual but if i get to go 2 and have a ritual id rather now cast the obliterator (an addittion to the origional deck) so no need for the colourless indestructable land now i should have more chance running extra swamps of either a lich or an obliterator on go 2 (i still have darksteel axe cast on go 1 for the lich) and still carry the threat of a go 1 lich with a vault so as a whole the deck shoud be quicker.ive added sever the bloodline as extra removal its flash back so its good value and it means i can play 2 or more abyssal persecutors at a time and not worry about removing them, whilst still using the sever the bloodline offensivly on opponents creatures erarly game and flashing back to removal my persecutors.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 02:20 as a comment on OBLITERATOR (fast black)

Permalink

ok cool post it and send me the link

ps could you check out my last 3 decks.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 01:52 in reply to #211990 on Innistrad constructed WU invisible stalker

Permalink

thanks mate, appreciated, ive posted the decks below ta

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 01:50 in reply to #211992 on Sic Semper Tyrannis

Permalink

i see your point i only usualy have 1 eldrazi out at a time or if im lucky 2 different ones you really dont need many, but i guess the point of this deck is to flip them in quickly so i do see where you are coming from,perhapse the odd snapcaster mage would mean your effecitivly carrying more not of this worlds ! ?? on that note do me a big favour and check my last few decks please ive had little in the way of comments ones a snapcaster mage deck then werewolfs and a highlander deck, thanks pal.

0
Posted 09 November 2011 at 01:48 in reply to #212000 on Eldrazi Polymorph

Permalink

ive decided i like the speed of the menmites and i only have 2 bloodghasts spare for now so ive gone 2 and 2 seems a reasonaabe balance and tbf the deck is performing, should i get hold of anoher couple of bloodghasts i may tinker further but for now hey

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 12:21 as a comment on CARD DRAW MASTICORE V2

Permalink

if you gotta sac to get the eldrazia in and our relying on a quick drop and kill nothing is more frustrating than cheating your huge eldrazi in for some monkey to doonblade it as soon as it lands id only run the indestructabe ones like infinate gyre and emarakul.poss kozliak cause at leasy u get te cards good deck though crazy mechanism !.

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 10:18 as a comment on Eldrazi Polymorph

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=255910

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=255938

thanks a bunch

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 09:40 as a comment on Sic Semper Tyrannis

Permalink

hey man, you asked recently if i played edh, i dont however my group has been trying different formats and one was whay we called a highlander deck which i think is the same as edh in fact im guessing thats the h right ?, anyway ours only had 60 cards but i ran a counterspell, destroy theme with ots of card draw and some big bombs and it played really well, ive played it still in constructed and it holds its own, i found it a really fun but challenging build as you have to pay more attention to casting costa ect as its hard to include all the spells you want at the right casting cost, but like i say i found it fun, i presume edh is an extended version of that, why the 99 cards ?, and whats the norm in terms of land i may have a go at your format so any do's and dont would be great, it may also mean i can look at your edh decks at last and have a better idea of what is going on lol, like this one i can see its a swarm of a deck that just keeps producing and keeps at em, it alsohs its tricks like the titans as bombs and i love hatred they wont see that one coming in this deck i dont think, looks good to my infant eye anyway, should i post my highlander deck its only 60 cards but will give an idea of the theme i guess ?, ive also reworked my snapcaster mage deck and built a werewolf i'll post links if yu dont mind, and do come back to me about this edh buiss, you may have created a monster lol, cheers mate.

0
Posted 04 November 2011 at 09:37 as a comment on Sic Semper Tyrannis

Permalink

21-40 of 648 items