surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

Yeah this one was a maybe thought for me. I figured with the stupidly huge amount of mana I could churn out, the land destruct/tainting won't be an issue.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 23:11 in reply to #107644 on MOAR LANDS

Permalink

Damn right. This is a lot different than my Treefolk deck, which I'm honestly more happy to see than you probably know, but it's very good in its own way. And of course, the mentioned combo is truly unfair. =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 23:05 as a comment on Strollin' through the Trees

Permalink

Haha yeah. After that game one of the people on the opposing team asked "Soooo...do you have any, uhm, 'nice' decks?" XD

Glad you like it =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 23:02 in reply to #107302 on Choke

Permalink

Treefolk are, in my opinion, one of the best "hidden gem" tribes in Magic. If you want help with the Treefolk deck, just ask =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:59 in reply to #107617 on Can you destory this deck

Permalink

True. =]

I'm not gonna lie dude, this is a VERY good deck.

1
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:52 in reply to #107617 on Can you destory this deck

Permalink

True. I'll have to put Plummets and Gravity Wells into my sideboard. =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:48 in reply to #107646 on Tree-ted!

Permalink

Yo Aaboy, if you have a moment, I'd like it if you took a look at my 90th (I know...) deck. It's called "Lady Luck" =]

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=127125

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:41 as a comment on 36-Creatures

Permalink

Which is why Spawnsire in casual = Absurd.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:39 in reply to #107636 on Eldrazi overun by Elves

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=114110

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=112925

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=112989

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=113032 (maybe this one...)

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=113429

Any of my Stompy

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=116345 (No problem)

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=118511

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=125886

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=125815 (My buddy plays a Land-D and this still beats him)

All jokes and stuff aside this is a pretty damn good deck. This might look like a lot, but it's hardly that many of my decks, so that's pretty cool. =]

1
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:37 in reply to #107617 on Can you destory this deck

Permalink

I like this deck a lot man. Pretty evil. I highly recommend Urza's Guilt. It hurts you a little (4 measly life) but often, in a deck like this, it will kill everyone in one shot. =]

2
Posted 20 December 2010 at 21:32 as a comment on "DoTheseJeansMakeMeLookFat"Dec

Permalink

To answer the deck's title, yes.

How do you want it done? Out Aggro or out Control? Or perhaps both? =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 20:26 as a comment on Can you destory this deck

Permalink

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF...rickin' good deck dude. Tarmagoyf IS epic, it's capable of being the most efficient Stompy card **of all time** in the right deck. We're talking turn 2 5/6 or even 6/7 (****!). That said, in this deck you're probably better off using the Ghoul.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 16:27 as a comment on Undieing Ones

Permalink

Just added Cream of the Crop in. Holy hell is that card abused when I have Leaf-Crown out, good lord.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 16:18 as a comment on Tree-ted!

Permalink

Looks much better now dude. And hey, if low lands works for you, go with it. =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 15:06 in reply to #107310 on Trembling Terra

Permalink

I thought about it, but to be honest, that ****ing card will get you killed so damn fast it's not even funny. Seriously, I dare you to play that card in a multiplayer game.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 15:00 in reply to #107300 on Fog that!

Permalink

Orzhov really is the king of Extraction. Very nice. =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 14:51 as a comment on Orzhov Extraction

Permalink

Truth be told I don't know very much about Bears or cards associated with them. Sorry =/

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 12:40 in reply to #106487 on Bear Crush

Permalink

Would look nicer as 32, 8, 0, 2

Exponential growth...awww yeah.

1
Posted 20 December 2010 at 12:32 in reply to #107294 on Boros Landfall

Permalink

Thanks. Not sure why I was using the Maiden instead...

And yeah, as you said the Maiden (now Vice) murders players. And also, playing an instant against me on my turn is going to REALLY cost you if I have Forced Fruition out.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 11:59 in reply to #107347 on Choke

Permalink

Nah, I'm always happy to help out. No time wasted at all =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 03:11 in reply to #107175 on White Token

Permalink

3,901-3,920 of 4,539 items