not sure what's going on in your local meta, but this deck should probably fare pretty well.
Permalink
Im an IRL friend of whatcountrywhat, and after a lot of thought he decided to take out champion of lambholt because, while it seems good, it actually is very slow. turn three to play, turn four before it can do anything. Thats just too long, he should be close to winning by then. And since the replacement for lambholt was mirran crusader, his deck is all the better for it
If you have any life gain, lim-dul's vault could be useful
The miracle cards are slow and conditional, they should be replaced with more creatures. You need to add elite inquisitor and mirran crusader.
Not bad at all, solid mana curve/ ratio, and i love the intruder alarm/ bloodline keeper combo, i made a legacy deck built around that combo, i like to call it "Mercy Rule" >:D Anyway, nice deck, should play pretty well
Im pretty new to legacy, usually play standard, im wondering if my deck http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=350376 would stand any chance at a legacy tournament
Blood seeker is an excellent way to suck out removal spells, people freak out over losing life to them. I did not know about ixidron before now, but in combination with massacre wurm... well, gg bro. As a side not, i would like to apologize, i was one of the many who bashed on the phylactery pwnage deck. My comments should have been more constructive, but it is frustrating to see a deck like that getting hundreds more likes and dozens more comments than the decks ive put a lot of time into making and balancing, like "garlic wont do" and "hexproof spirits" So again, sorry for that, point taken.
Decent mana curve, except that you only have 16 lands, youre gonna need 22 to 24. You need strangleroot geist, and id recommend more green sun's zenith. Other than that, id say see how garruk plays, cause i dont think hes that great, but i may be wrong. Pretty good though, if you can set up huntsmaster with siverheart its gg
Sorry, just read the description, no pillar of flame. But like i said, there are other cards that dead weight could be replaced with. Beyond that though, it looks very dangerous, good job
Good mana curve, no singletons, overall very solid deck :) I would say drop dead weight, there is better removal out there. It may be a stretch because you only have the dual lands, but pillar of flame is and idea. Also, very similar to my vampire deck, the description details what it will become in m13. give it a look for me: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=335028
Very well put together, WhatCountryWhat is a friend of mine, ill definitely have to make sure he looks at your deck
It's a good start, but I'm gonna tell you what I tell most decks I comment on: no singletons. To make your deck work well, consistently, you need to pick only the cards you NEED, then have 4 of them. Try looking at my Vampire deck, I use it at FNM at it functions pretty well: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=335028
He needs to get some morals first, he clearly has no problem with cheating, which i refuse to accept, regardless of his actual deck making ability. As far as the deck goes, itd be ok if he simply trimmed everything to the 4x rule and added two swamps.
Do you even know how to play magic? This is laughable in itself, but the fact that it made it to upcoming decks is frankly disgusting. How could it possibly be fun to "win" when you are outright cheating? If all of that wasn't enough, it's just a bad deck. Decks should have close to 60 cards to operate efficiently, have you looked at your mana curve? 8 cards for one mana, then EVERYTHING else is three or more. A typical standard deck could beat this, and a legacy deck would simply laugh at it. Don't post on this site until you learn to play the game, stop wasting the time of real wizards.
for future reference, blue is abbreviated U
Happy to see a well-built deck for once. Im so tired of seeing 60 singletons called a deck. Pretty solid build if you ask me, moonmist can make your werewolves pretty dangerous, but you need huntmaster of the fells, and while its name escapes me, theres a wolf/werewolf solbond that gives both creatures +4/+4. you may want to look into them. That said, I dont know if it is better than my aggro vamps, check it out: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=335028
Ordinarily i'd agree, but consider how dangerous phantasmal image becomes; 2 mana, any creature on the board, can't be targeted. Pretty good combo. But to make it worthwhile he should see f he can add a little more in the illusion department
Hero of Bladehold wins games, it will absolutely work with the deck, and is kind of a necessity as long as it is in rotation.
Not gonna like, i liked it before i even looked at the deck, great name :D but also looks like a fun deck to play...
This is a good start, but to make the deck more consistent I recommend you look through your creature list, and choose about half, only the best. You should then have four of those. You want to make sure you have the cards you need no matter what, so any cards that you don't see yourself NEEDING to win, take out. Im not gonna leave a link, but i have a similar deck i use in t2 tournaments, check it out
361-380 of 392 items