surewhynot

296 Decks, 4,543 Comments, 1,812 Reputation

THIS IS NOT MY DECK!

But yeah, Sundial would be nasty...

0
Posted 02 August 2011 at 00:39 in reply to #185180 on Thievery

Permalink

BSZ with Flourishing Defenses does indeed make even more tokens. If I pay more than 1 for the X in BSZ it gets really crazy...

Let's say I have 5 tokens and play a BSZ where X is 3 and there's 5 other creatures out.

First I put a -1/-1 on all my tokens and the 5 other creatures, then I put out 10 tokens, put a -1/-1 counter on those, put in 10 more/new tokens, etc. This would end up giving Bitter Ordeal a "grave storm" effect of around 30-40 depending on other factors. That's enough to flat-out win in almost every case...

With Doubling Season the effects are exponential =P

0
Posted 02 August 2011 at 00:35 in reply to #186985 on Bittersweet Symphony

Permalink

I have a sideboard for the deck that has a number of anti-flying things because it really does have trouble with flying stuff =/

I tend to use this against decks with very little flying though, because I like it how it is and the SB, while effective, isn't as much fun to play =/ Even so, the BoPs and Cloudgoat provide pretty decent defense against the occasional flyer

0
Posted 01 August 2011 at 23:53 in reply to #187599 on Great gig in the sky

Permalink

Look at Rite of Consumption. Now look at Abby. You're welcome =P

Btw, I'm back bitches! =P

1
Posted 01 August 2011 at 23:42 as a comment on Crateresque Inferno..

Permalink

Omg...I just got back from a week vacation and holy balls...I have a looooooot of comments to read O_O

Anyways, I built this only a few days before I left, and so I haven't really had much time to finagle it to how I want it to be...give me some time and I'll probably have this changed up a little =P

One thing though, I thought WoF wasn't standard anymore?

0
Posted 01 August 2011 at 23:34 in reply to #186956 on Taps

Permalink

I wanted to add so many more cards than I could possibly ever fit...those guys included. That's the sign of a general you love...there's an endless list of cards you want to use =P

1
Posted 01 August 2011 at 23:27 in reply to #186394 on Capere, inveniet Vitam et Mortem

Permalink

I've thought about using Devouring Greed before, and I'm still mulling around the idea. I might try it for a few games and see how it does...

Btw, I'm back and holy hell a lot has happened since I've been gone O_o

0
Posted 01 August 2011 at 23:22 in reply to #186060 on Lux Aeterna

Permalink

Eh, I figured it was, but then why are Archon's not just called Angels too?

0
Posted 25 July 2011 at 04:09 in reply to #184756 on In excelsis Deo

Permalink

The singular Extirpate has saved me on more than one occasion. Even before Mental Misstep, getting through the swarm of counters thrown at you without Split Second could be tough. Now with MM, people are very willing to pay 2 life to keep their deck from getting gutted =/

Split Second makes their responses useless, and is a solid "Deal with it" sort of answer. It can make, and has made, a huge difference.

I feel I should warn you...All types of Extraction have a rather steep learning curve. This one in particular is incredibly skill-intensive...so take the possibility of investing in it with a large grain of salt =/

0
Posted 25 July 2011 at 03:52 in reply to #184757 on "I am become Death"

Permalink

Oh hell, I forgot about Narc. Thanks man!

0
Posted 25 July 2011 at 03:43 in reply to #184662 on Taps

Permalink

Yeah, it's one of the more versatile of the dual cards. I love Seek obviously, but Hide is...meh...

Are you thinking of swapping out the Ooze for another Goyf?

0
Posted 24 July 2011 at 20:17 in reply to #184301 on NO RUG

Permalink

I'm starting to think...after playing this and other decks with it...that it could be a good idea to ban or at least restrict Maelstrom Pulse from Tribal. Sure, Pyroclasm and the like are nasty against the token spewing tribes, but Pulse just says "3 mana: Target token using tribe loses"

-_-

0
Posted 24 July 2011 at 20:02 as a comment on Green onions

Permalink

Sometimes it's a nice break to play mindless decks after a number of games playing PAL =/

0
Posted 24 July 2011 at 03:31 in reply to #184465 on My name is Legion

Permalink

I know that (I use Seek for cryin' out loud), I mean do you tend to only use one over the other, or do you find both of them helpful?

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 23:14 in reply to #184301 on NO RUG

Permalink

You should man, it's tons of fun =P

Oh, and dredge is activated as a substitute to drawing a card. For this reason, each use of Dredge requires a draw clause. If you had 2 in the yard, and had used something that let you draw 3 cards, you could dredge for 5 to get one back, draw a card, then dredge 5 to get the other back too! (Or any other combination of that)

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 23:12 in reply to #184352 on Dredge

Permalink

=O

Well that's a shame...=/

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 21:21 in reply to #184352 on Dredge

Permalink

Yo Ethan, do you have any tribal decks?

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 21:04 as a comment on Dredge

Permalink

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wacYm5Z_Mf0

"Deal with it" =P

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 20:43 in reply to #183261 on Great gig in the sky

Permalink

Yup =P

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 20:27 in reply to #184314 on Tim-TIMMAH!

Permalink

lol now you've got me trying to think of a better 4-drop...

Haven't thought of one yet =[

How does Scavenging Ooze perform in the deck? I was wondering about that dude...And do you use both Fire and Ice or just one of them?

0
Posted 23 July 2011 at 19:45 as a comment on NO RUG

Permalink

2,361-2,380 of 4,539 items